The British government is under attack from music legend Elton John. Elton John proposed the change in AI copyright as a “crime” and accused the artist of “being stolen.”
“Danger is for young artists, they don’t have the resources to check and fight big technology,” John said. BBC Interview on sunday. “It’s a criminal and I feel incredibly betrayed.”
John’s statement comes in response to controversial proposals that ease domestic copyright laws and allow AI developers to train models on creative works that have legitimate access.
If the government proceeded with plans to allow AI companies to use artist content without paying for their occupation, they said they were “a stolen and thieves on a massive scale.”
The UK Department of Science, Innovation and Technology did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Concerns about artist permission and compensation guarantees have led John to gather support along with the artists’ alliance. Open Letter To help warn them about how planned government changes will affect creators.
The artist is asking Kiel Prime Minister Stage to retreat the amendments submitted by Baronesbeevan Kidron over the so-called data (use and access) bill.
The open letter was signed with prominent figures such as Paul McCartney, Eric Clapton, the Isiglo River, Ed Sheeran and Dua Lipa, as well as more than 400 signatories for groups such as national journalists, Getty Images and Sony Music Publishing.
Data Invoice It is part of a broader initiative called the “AI Opportunity Action Plan.” suggestion This sets recommendations to strengthen the UK AI sector focused on expanding infrastructure, integrating public services and developing home-made AI talent.
The Labour government solidified its position and “shaping the AI revolution rather than seeing the way it shapes us,” wrote Peter Kyle, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, in his proposal.
The government estimates that AI could increase UK productivity by 1.5% per year, and if fully realized, could add £47 billion (US$62.5 billion) a year to the economy.
last week, Disagreement regarding the bill He raised concerns about whether AI companies should disclose data used to train models as lawmakers called for stricter rules to help lawmakers determine whether their work has been scraped.
However, the House refused certain amendments proposed by the House, including those that require AI companies to obtain permission before using copyrighted materials.
edit Sebastian Sinclair
Discover more from Earlybirds Invest
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
