We and the UK are moving away from the global AI Paris community

The US and the UK have not added signatures on international agreements on AI during the global summit in Paris while citing national security concerns among other reasons.

Other countries have signed agreements pledged to the comprehensive, open and ethical development and deployment of technology. However, both countries believe that industry growth is too focused on AI regulations that are not healthy.

The UK and the US don’t think so

According to the BBC, 12 other countries, including China, France and India, have signed an AI declaration aimed at supporting the safety of AI. In a brief statement, the UK has made it clear that it has not added its name to its list due to concerns about national security and “global governance.”

Previously, US Vice President JD Vance told a Paris representative that too many technology regulations would “take off and kill transformative industries.”

He added that the technology is an opportunity the Trump administration doesn’t want to waste, and that it should prioritize its growth-promoting AI policy over safety.

This contrasts with French President Emmanuel Macron saying he supports the need for further regulation.

“We need these rules to help AI move forward.”

President Macron.

Vice President Vance’s comments contradict the position the UK previously held because it defended AI security. Then Prime Minister Rishi Snack held his first Global AI Safety Summit in November 2023.

In a statement, the UK government revealed that it had “consented many of the leader’s declarations,” but felt it lacked some parts.

“We felt that the Declaration did not provide sufficient practical clarity for global governance and did not adequately address the more stringent questions about the challenges posed by national security and AI.”

British government spokesman.

Ukai, the trade organisation representing companies in sectors across the country, has expressed its opinion that this is a step in the right direction.

“Ukai is cautiously welcoming the government’s refusal to sign this statement, indicating that it is seeking more practical solutions Ukai has been seeking. Ukai CEO Tim Flagg.

“We agree that it is important to be environmentally responsible, but how to balance this responsibility with the growing needs of the AI ​​industry is questionable,” Flagg said. Masu.

Is the UK below that reliability?

The fact-checking organization said the UK’s decision to refuse to sign the contract would be at stake.

“By refusing to sign today’s international AI action statement, the UK government is strugglingly trustworthy as a global leader in safe, ethical and reliable AI innovation.” He said.

Paris Communique seeks to limit digital disparities by promoting accessibility to AI technology. They also try to ensure that AI development is “transparent”, “safe”, and “safe and reliable.”

“Make AI sustainable for people and planets” is listed as a top priority.

According to the BBC, the deal also touches on AI energy use. Experts warn that the use of AI energy can swell as much as small countries need in the coming years.

“When you look at the summit declaration, it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly what that statement the government doesn’t agree with,” said Michael Biltwissle, associate director of the ADA Lovelace Institute.

The UK also argued that the decision was not influenced by the Trump administration and was purely led to “ensure a balance between our own national interests and national security.”

Around the world, executives, diplomats and policymakers know how to capture the economic benefits of AI technology and address the risks of that technology.