Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Forward Industries, known for making protective casing for medical devices, has announced a massive $1.65B private placement to go big on Solana ($SOL).

Backed by big names like Galaxy Digital and Multicoin Capital, the move shows tremendous institutional confidence in Solana’s future.

Forward Industries’ stocks shot up by 6% right after the announcement and have continued to rise steadily overall, indicating the market took it well.

With Solana looking good, now is the perfect time to look at Snorter Token ($SNORT), the Swiss-army knife you need for trading everything Solana-based.

Why the Enthusiasm? Understanding Solana’s Momentum

Why are the big players piling into Solana right now? The technical indicators could hold the answer. Solana’s price chart is showing what traders call a bull pennant pattern.

Think of it as a pause in the middle of a major run-up. The price surged over 70% from June to August, and now it’s catching its breath before a potential big move. If the pattern plays out, some analysts predict the price could hit $300 in the near term, with some even eyeing $1K down the road.

Beyond the charts, the network itself is thriving. Solana’s Total Value Locked (TVL) has skyrocketed to $12.987B, a massive 109% jump since April, driven by increased activity on popular dApps like Raydium and Jupiter.

The combo of strong technical signals and real-world growth is what makes Solana such an attractive bet for big investors and companies alike. Projects like Snorter Token ($SNORT), which amplify real-world growth by making Solana-based trading easier, can only strengthen the network.

Snorter Token ($SNORT): A New Class of Utility-First Meme Coin

Lots of tokens pop up based on a funny joke or meme, but Snorter Token ($SNORT) is a different beast. It combines meme coin vibes with advanced tools for traders.

$SNORT is the official token for the Snorter Bot, a trading bot in its beta phase built directly on Telegram. It’s not a promise of future utility; this is a token with a working product.

Holding $SNORT allows you to access various premium features that help you navigate volatile meme coin markets. These include lightning-fast sniping, copy-trading to learn from the best, and rug-pull detection to keep you safe from malicious projects.

In addition to the trading tools, you also benefit from reduced trading fees, paying 0.85% compared to 1.5% for non-holders. The incentive directly rewards platform engagement, creating sustainable demand for the token.

The Vision: Building a Community on a Foundation of Value

Snorter Token ($SNORT) has raised over $3.8M in its presale so far, which shows investors are paying attention. It’s also been professionally audited by firms like SolidProof and Coinsult, which builds trust and credibility.

$SNORT isn’t just a hype-driven meme coin; it’s the key to a set of tools designed to give retail traders the edge over bots and whales.

This is also just the beginning. The project’s roadmap points to continuous expansion and value creation. After launching on Solana and Ethereum, the team plans to expand to other major blockchains like BNB Chain and Polygon.

Time to get your nose to the ground and sniff up some $SNORT? Join the presale now.

Remember, this is not intended as financial advice, and you should always do your own research before making any financial investments.

Authored by Ben Wallis, Bitcoinist — https://bitcoinist.com/solana-rally-after-$1.68B-treasury-purchase-snorter-soars/

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

World Liberty Financial now carries a market value near $5.6 billion. However, many of us who watched WLFI’s debut are still unsure what the project actually does, what has shipped, and what, if anything, is new.

To date, deliverables include USD1, governance voting, and a proposed Aave v3 money market. Let’s weigh those elements against the valuation and ownership incentives that frame WLFI’s first days of trading.

World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token began public trading on Sept. 1 after holders voted to allow transfers.

The launch put a multibillion-dollar value on a token that started life as nontransferable, raising an immediate question for investors assessing a roughly $5 billion to $7 billion market value: what is substantively new here?

What has WLFI actually shipped?

The project describes WLFI as a governance asset. Holders can vote on proposals, including the July decision to make WLFI tradable, but published materials and third-party explainers do not show equity, revenue rights, or other cash flow tied to the token.

That framing, governance without economic rights, remains the clearest documented utility as of this week. The shift to tradability came by vote and does not add a claim on protocol revenue.

What has shipped around WLFI is largely adjacent infrastructure. USD1, a dollar stablecoin issued by the same venture, is live with custody and infrastructure provided by BitGo, and Binance announced a USD1 spot listing in May.

These elements establish fiat on-chain plumbing but accrue no direct economic right to WLFI holders.

The flagship money market that would mark clear DeFi utility, a proposed Aave v3 instance branded for WLFI, has gone through Aave governance checkpoints. However, there is still no public, verifiable WLFI front end or running market for users.

The Aave forum shows a temp check and an ARFC thread for an Ethereum deployment, yet no production launch is documented on Aave’s site or WLFI’s public channels. As Aave governance records indicate, the idea exists on paper, not as a usable market today.

Trading began via a staged unlock and a Lockbox claiming flow. Exchange communications reference pre-market perpetuals that transitioned alongside the spot go-live, and multiple venues now show WLFI pairs or price pages, with activity on Binance, OKX and Bybit.

The mechanics concentrated the initial float, with only a fraction of the supply unlocked for early investors. Per Bybit’s pre-market notice, OKX, and day-one reporting that pegged market value in the mid-single-digit billions.

Is WLFI really worth its multi-billion valuation?

Ownership and incentives sit at the core of the valuation debate. Reporting places the Trump family’s exposure near a quarter of the token supply through affiliated entities, with new wealth on paper following the trading switch.

The Crypto Investor Blueprint: A 5-Day Course On Bagholding, Insider Front-Runs, and Missing Alpha

Nice Your first lesson is on the way.

Please add [email protected] to your email whitelist.

Reuters further reports that DT Marks DEFI LLC, tied to the family, holds equity and revenue rights in World Liberty Financial and has already realized hundreds of millions of dollars from the venture’s activities. Those arrangements pertain to the operating company, not to WLFI token holders.

For readers tracking the project’s history, WLFI’s path from teaser to tradability is well documented. Prior reporting on whitelisting, funding totals, ecosystem tie-ups, and the July vote covers the raise and treasury activity, the Sui partnership, and the governance vote. The through line remains a governance token with voting rights alongside a custodial stablecoin.

The novelty question, therefore, resolves to design and delivery. A governance token that gains tradability by vote is common across crypto projects, and a custodial dollar stablecoin with qualified trust custody resembles existing large issuers.

The proposed Aave deployment could create a natural venue for USD1 and begin to connect WLFI governance to visible market parameters, but until a public instance is live, there is no documented cash flow, fee share, or protocol discount that accrues to WLFI holders.

The differentiators to date are distribution and brand, not technical design. That leaves little that is new.

True novelty would require governance that directly sets parameters across integrated markets, on-chain revenue routing with verifiable attestations, or contract-level controls that make votes binding on fees, risk limits, and emissions.

None of that is live.

As delivered, WLFI matches prior patterns, a voting token, a custodial stablecoin, and a planned market.

Until a public deployment shows votes changing production settings and producing measurable holder benefits, WLFI remains an aggregation of existing parts rather than a new token design.

As of Sept. 3, the token’s concrete holder utility is the ability to vote, the stablecoin exists, and the rest is still pending execution.

Put plainly, for a market now valuing WLFI in the mid-single digit billions, the project has shipped fairly basic DeFi products, while its advertised lending market has not launched in a way users can touch.

Mentioned in this article

Ripple’s $606M XRP transfer raises eyebrows

XRP shows signs of recovery as Ripple makes the big move.

• The big move. Ripple shifted 200M XRP on Aug. 18 to an unknown wallet.

San Francisco-based blockchain company Ripple has stirred speculations with a mysterious transfer involving millions of XRP. On August 18, on-chain tracking platform Whale Alert spotted a major transfer from Ripple involving 200,000,000 XRP. According to the data provider, Ripple had moved a mega amount of XRP to an unknown address. The transfer was worth over $606 million per XRP’s price at the time the transfer was executed. 

• Market context. Transfer happened during a market-wide downturn.

The massive XRP transfer from Ripple has sparked reactions across the community as the destination of the transferred assets remained anonymous. While market watchers have been closely monitoring on-chain moves like this, they have expressed curiosity as to whether the move could be the firm preparing for institutional deals or probably redistributing its reserves.

• Bullish view. Could signal private accumulation or strategic positioning for XRP adoption.

With the move coming amid a broad crypto market bloodbath, investors fear that the move might be Ripple preparing to dump its holdings ahead of deeper price declines. Following the anonymous nature of Ripple’s giant move on XRP today, the lack of clarity on the destination of the transfer has fueled discussions about whether it could be tied to upcoming private accumulation which may be bullish for XRP’s potential price.

You Might Also Like

Shiba Inu price struggles at thin support

Shiba Inu coin holders better buckle up as SHIB price is on verge of adding zero.

• Key support level. $0.0000120 — repeatedly tested, now at risk of breaking.

SHIB is trading at $0.0000126 right now. The only thing holding it back from dropping into new territory is thin support at $0.0000120. SHIB price has been moving in tight waves this summer: a brief 8.9% gain in July, followed by a drop in August. 

Its support line has been tested several times on the daily chart, with each rebound losing strength. If it breaks, the token will reach areas last visited in Q1, when sentiment was far weaker.

• Bigger picture. 2025 marked by persistent monthly losses.

The weekly candles show the difficulty of this year. After the surge in 2024, SHIB failed to keep up. The year started with losses of 10.9% in January, followed by 26.1% in February, and red in March and June. Despite sporadic recoveries, the coin has been dropping for months.

For SHIB, the next few weeks are going to be important. The community needs to find enough buying power to hold steady above support and set up for a late-year push. They did it last November with a 49% rally, after all. If not, the charts are set to lock in the new reality of another zero. 

You Might Also Like

Ethereum (ETH) price dip warning

Chris Weston, head of research at Australian trading firm Pepperstone, believes that traders should wait for ETH to regain its momentum.

• Key view. Traders should avoid rushing into dip-buying ETH.

Chris Weston, head of research at Australian trading firm Pepperstone, argues that traders should not rush to buy the Ethereum (ETH) dip. “As we see on the daily [chart], the time for patience on new longs is needed…” Weston said. Momentum buying instead of dip buying The trader has predicted that the price of the flagship altcoin could potentially drop back to the $4,100 level, which is the previous “breakout level.” 

• Market context. ETH fell to $4,233 intraday low.

Weston has opined that it would be more prudent to wait until the dip is bought by others and ETH regains its momentum. Earlier, the price of the leading alternative cryptocurrency plunged to an intraday low of $4,233, which is the lowest level since Aug. 12. That said, the cryptocurrency is still up by nearly 15% this August after surging by as much as 49% in July. 

You Might Also Like

The total on-chain stablecoin transaction volume surged to a new all-time high of $1.5 trillion in July, marking a significant milestone in the sector.

According to Sentora’s (formerly IntoTheBlock) data, this figure represents a sharp increase from the $1.26 trillion processed in June and surpasses the previous high seen in August 2024, when volumes topped $1.4 trillion.

Meanwhile, a closer look at the July numbers revealed that Circle’s USDC dominated the stablecoin market, accounting for nearly 50% of the total volume. USDC transactions reached approximately $748 billion in July.

Meanwhile, Tether’s USDT, the largest stablecoin by circulating supply, followed with a volume of $420 billion. The decentralized DAI stablecoin secured the third spot with $261 billion in transactions.

Why stablecoin volume rose in July

The remarkable increase in stablecoins’ on-chain volume can be attributed to several factors, including Bitcoin and Ethereum’s record performances in July.

Last month, Bitcoin price rose to a new all-time high of over $123,000 while ETH’s price also approached the $4000 threshold.

The price performance of these assets sparked significant on-chain activity from investors, who invested their profits in non-volatile digital assets like USDT and USDC.

In addition, the stablecoin industry saw the approval of its first major bill in the US, which helped clear the regulatory uncertainty in the sector.

The GENIUS Act, signed into law on July 19, established clear guidelines for stablecoins and digital asset-backed financial products. The new regulations include reserve requirements and oversight by the Federal Reserve, which are likely to foster greater trust and stability in the sector.

As a result, prominent financial institutions like JPMorgan and other top global companies like Meta have been exploring the use of stablecoins for cross-border transactions and other financial services, which further legitimizes the market.

With this clearer regulatory backdrop and surging adoption, stablecoin market capitalization has climbed past $278 billion, according to CryptoSlate’s data.

Mentioned in this article

Coinbase has crossed a significant milestone, reaching a market capitalization of over $100 billion amid renewed momentum across the crypto sector.

According to Google Finance data, shares of Coinbase (COIN) reached a new all-time high of $398.50 during trading hours on July 14. However, the stock’s value ended the day at around $394, reflecting a 2% increase during the period.

Considering this performance, Kylie Reidhead, co-owner of the crypto media outlet Milk Road, suggested that Coinbase could grow into a trillion-dollar company.

He likened Coinbase’s trajectory to the rise of Amazon in retail and Netflix in entertainment, adding that the US-based crypto exchange is positioning itself as a pillar of “upgrading” the current financial system.

Reidhead noted that this positioning could help the Brian Armstrong-led firm overtake traditional banking giants like JPMorgan as crypto infrastructure becomes more integrated with mainstream finance.

Why Coinbase stock is rallying

The Coinbase surge is, in part, due to improving macro conditions for the crypto industry, rising digital asset prices, and the company’s expanding role in merging traditional finance with the emerging industry.

Its inclusion in the S&P 500 Index earlier this year signaled growing confidence in the exchange’s fundamentals and profitability. The move is also expected to increase institutional ownership as index funds adjust their portfolios.

The COIN stock rally also coincided with rising crypto prices, particularly Bitcoin, which surged to an all-time high of more than $120,000 on the same day.

Is Coinbase overvalued?

Despite the positive outlook, some analysts believe Coinbase’s valuation may be inflated.

Analysts at 10x Research have warned that Coinbase might be overvalued, particularly as institutional investors prefer large-cap Bitcoin miners as proxies for the top crypto asset.

According to the firm, Coinbase is still trading at a premium relative to Bitcoin, despite both assets experiencing gains.

The firm stated:

“Coinbase remains overvalued relative to Bitcoin, though both have gained. Only a few assets, including Circle and Robinhood, show stronger momentum than Bitcoin.”

Notably, HC Wainwright recently downgraded Coinbase from Buy to Sell, citing its 150% rally over the past quarter and a price-to-earnings ratio that may not reflect underlying fundamentals.

Mentioned in this article

At the time of writing, Bitcoin has regained some ground and is trading at $102,1010, representing a 2.4% increase over the past 24 hours and a 5.82% decrease over the last week. Amid this price performance, recent on-chain analysis points to a phase of consolidation rather than a structural breakdown.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost shared in a QuickTake post that long-term Bitcoin holders appear to be maintaining their positions rather than exiting, indicating continued conviction despite short-term volatility.

Bitcoin On-Chain Indicators Signal Consolidation, Not Capitulation

According to Darkfost, the current market behavior is reflective of a quiet consolidation period, with long-term holders showing little inclination to sell.

Based on the 30-day moving average of Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD), his analysis shows that the metric has stayed below the 0.8 threshold typically associated with major corrections. The value recently peaked at 0.6 before trending downward, suggesting limited market overheating at present levels.

Darkfost emphasized that this moderation could precede a continuation of the broader bull cycle, mirroring past market structures where consolidation phases led to further price advances.

He noted that past bull runs have often been characterized by a “staircase” trajectory, periods of sideways or modest downward movement followed by renewed upward momentum. In this context, subdued sentiment may indicate that the market is preparing for a potential next leg higher. The analyst wrote:

Importantly, this does not signal the end of the bull cycle. Instead, similar to the past two phases, we may once again see a staircase-like movement where consolidation is followed by another leg up. Historically, Bitcoin’s explosive rallies tend to occur when market attention fades and sentiment is quiet, making the current silence potentially a precursor to the next big move.

Whale Behavior Remains Steady Amid Market Tensions

Complementing this outlook, another CryptoQuant contributor, Mignolet, provided insight into whale activity during the current consolidation phase.

He noted that while the market setup resembles the double-top formation seen in 2021, key on-chain signals from whales have not aligned with those seen during that previous peak.

Specifically, Ethereum transaction outflows, often used as a proxy for large investor exits, have not shown the kind of spikes observed during the 2021 market top.

Mignolet pointed out that although Ethereum has seen a gradual decline in market share relative to other layer-1 and layer-2 chains since 2020, its transactional data still maintains a strong correlation with Bitcoin price movements.

The absence of aggressive exit activity among large holders suggests that major market participants are not rushing for the exits, despite heightened geopolitical uncertainty and short-term price volatility.

Featured image created with DALL-E, Chart from TradingView

A tweet directed at the BoDoggos team for charging a subscription fee on their trading news app has sparked an industry-wide debate on what NFT holders are entitled to receive.

@Lewsiphur tweeted a screenshot from what appears to be a holder-only section of the BoDoggos Discord on June 17. In the screenshot, BoDoggos CEO and co-founder Nick O’Neill shares details on the “first version of the app”, alongside a discounted link to gain access. @Lewsiphur took issue at BoDoggos holders needing to pay for app access, whilst the BoDoggos team defended their need to cover “ongoing cost”.

As this back-and-forth continued on X, many big names, collectors and everyday members of the community added their opinion on what NFT holders should be entitled to from an NFT project – in what has become the latest hot topic of the NFT industry.

Key Insights

• A tweet directed at BoDoggos has sparked an industry-wide debate on what NFT holders should be entitled to
• The tweet took issue at BoDoggos’ plan to charge NFT holders a discounted rate for access to their new trading news app
• @Lewsiphur argued that holders should get ongoing app access for free, whilst BoDoggos cited the need to cover ongoing costs
• This debate caused widespread reaction in the NFT community, with big names and community members alike sharing their thoughts
• The conversation has continued, with a member of the BoDoggos team taking aim at another project

On one side, original tweeter @Lewsiphur and his supporters generally believe that holders of NFT collectables should receive access to future products, developments and releases for free as a reward their support.

On the other side, BoDoggos and their supporters argue that these products have many ongoing costs – such as API fees, employee salaries, operating costs and more – and in order to survive, grow and deliver on their promises to their holders, recurring revenue is a necessity to ensure their survival.

Core members of the BoDoggos team, including Nick O’Neill and @EasyEatsBodega, responded directly to @Lewsiphur’s tweet to discuss the situation – and the focal point of the debate sparked reaction from across the NFT space.

Coinbase’s sponsorship of the military parade in Washington, D.C., on June 14 has sparked a debate about whether crypto has lost sight of its original ethos.

The parade, which was held to commemorate the U.S. Army’s 250th birthday, took place amid the country-wide ‘No Kings’ protests. The protestors voiced their opposition to President Donald Trump’s immigration policy and mass deportations, calling the parade, which coincided with Trump’s 79th birthday, the behavior of a dictator.

Coinbase, the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. and the third-largest in the world, joined tech giants like Amazon in sponsoring the military parade, which drew a meager and largely quiet crowd.  The parade had a total of 22 corporate sponsors, among which was Palantir, the big data analytics firm tasked with compiling data on Americans across federal agencies using an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered system.

Coinbase, which had previously donated $1 million for Trump’s inauguration in January, also received a shoutout from the event MC towards the end of the parade. Coinbase’s sponsorship, which was construed as support and endorsement for the heavily criticized event, has sparked a debate among the crypto community: Has crypto lost touch with its anti-establishment roots?

How crypto might be straying from its original ethos

When Satoshi Nakamoto mined the first Bitcoin (BTC) in January 2009, he left a message in the Genesis block. The message pointed to an article by The Times on how the U.K. was planning to bail out banks in the aftermath of the 2008 economic collapse.

Therefore, Nakamoto’s invention of Bitcoin, which essentially gave birth to the crypto industry, was a form of protest. With Bitcoin, Nakamoto offered an alternative to traditional currency controlled by central banks and governments that constantly put the burden of bailing out companies on citizens.

Bitcoin was designed to bypass governments and establishments that control the supply of traditional currencies, allowing individuals to transact via a decentralized medium called blockchains. It tracks, therefore, that the earliest adopters of Bitcoin and crypto were tech enthusiasts and libertarians opposed to control and surveillance by centralized authorities, including banks and governments.

Coinbase’s sponsorship has, therefore, rightly sparked a debate about whether crypto has lost its way. As Felix Jauvin, director and host of the Forward Guidance podcast, wrote on X:

“Bros I don’t think crypto is a counter culture movement anymore”

Counterculture movements propose values that are different from or opposed to mainstream culture. Crypto was once viewed as a means of defying the mainstream culture of dependence on centralized financial authorities.

But with Coinbase sponsoring the military parade that celebrated the U.S. Army, which serves as a prime symbol of centralized power and authority, Jauvin’s question about crypto’s evolution has struck a chord with many.

What the crypto community is saying

Several crypto community members agreed with Jauvin, with many proclaiming that crypto drifted away from its original goal a long time ago or that it “never was.” For instance, one X user stated that crypto has not been a counterculture movement for three years, adding:

“There will always be parts of crypto that are counter culture, though, and others that aren’t.”

Several users also questioned the need for corporate sponsors when it is estimated that the parade would cost approximately $45 million in public funds. One user tauntingly asked if Coinbase would also sponsor the repairs of D.C.’s “tank mangled streets.”

Others were not surprised by Coinbase’s move. One X user wrote:

“It makes sense, like 30 percent of the crypto community went from libertarian types to some boot-licking version of MAGA.”

Several users also dissented with Jauvin’s claim, with one user noting that a bottom-up, permissionless system will usually evolve in ways that participants do not agree with. The user added:

“Better this than specific groups dictating what should and shouldn’t be.

We can’t eat our cake and have it too!”

Many crypto holders also viewed Coinbase’s sponsorship as a way to maximize gains, while withholding judgment.

Mentioned in this article