Rumors – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com Latest Crypto News Tue, 09 Sep 2025 03:38:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.7 https://i0.wp.com/earlybirdsinvest.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cropped-New-Project-2024-12-17T235703.455.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Rumors – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com 32 32 240146708 Comment on How Kitely responded to infringing content rumors by Lurker https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-lurker/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-lurker/#respond Tue, 09 Sep 2025 03:38:10 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-lurker/
Fashionistas Island on Kitely, which allegedly infringed copyrights (Image via Fashionistas Island.)

About a week ago, a social media post accused a region on the Kitely grid of distributing infringing content.

Strictly speaking, any infringement complaint needs to be made by the original content creator, through official channels. That wasn’t the case here.

It was a pseudonymous user, DMCA GridSkipper, claiming that the Fashionistas Island had some infringing content — but offered no details about what specifically that content was or whose copyright was being infringed.

“It didn’t even include all the information required by a DMCA, primarily the infringing content was never identified,” Kitely CEO Ilan Tochner told Hypergrid Business. In addition, the person reporting was using a throw-away email address and a brand-new Kitely account.

Despite the lack of concrete information, the grid took action.

“We took the report seriously despite the questionable nature of the reporter’s identity as it really shouldn’t matter who reported it if the content itself was indeed being distributed without a proper license,” said Tochner. “We responded quickly to the possibility that there was infringing content to ensure that if it existed it would be promptly removed from our service.”

Within two hours, the grid set the region access to private, so that only the region owner could visit it, and contacted the region owner. Eventually, the grid took down all the content.

Kitely requires a formal complaint about any content to be done by clicking a Report World link on the world’s World Page, sending an email or internal message, posting the information on the forum or filing a DCMA take down notice on their website copyright notice link.

Some grid owners claim that they cannot remove or limit access to content before receiving a formal complaint from the content author or before being served with a formal DMCA. In fact, that is one of the excuses for infringing content in OpenSim and virtual worlds, in addition to 10 other excuses Maria Korolov wrote about last year.

But grids are increasingly getting more proactive when it comes to protecting creator rights on their platforms.

For example, DigiWorldz recently banned use of Athena Mesh bodies following informal complains on social media forums, even without formal DCMA notice or filing. The grid took the action after confirming with the original author that use of the meshes was violating copyrights.

 

Latest posts by David Kariuki (see all)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-lurker/feed/ 0 57493
Comment on How Kitely responded to infringing content rumors by cuore spezzato https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-cuore-spezzato/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-cuore-spezzato/#respond Sun, 07 Sep 2025 03:43:07 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-cuore-spezzato/
Fashionistas Island on Kitely, which allegedly infringed copyrights (Image via Fashionistas Island.)

About a week ago, a social media post accused a region on the Kitely grid of distributing infringing content.

Strictly speaking, any infringement complaint needs to be made by the original content creator, through official channels. That wasn’t the case here.

It was a pseudonymous user, DMCA GridSkipper, claiming that the Fashionistas Island had some infringing content — but offered no details about what specifically that content was or whose copyright was being infringed.

“It didn’t even include all the information required by a DMCA, primarily the infringing content was never identified,” Kitely CEO Ilan Tochner told Hypergrid Business. In addition, the person reporting was using a throw-away email address and a brand-new Kitely account.

Despite the lack of concrete information, the grid took action.

“We took the report seriously despite the questionable nature of the reporter’s identity as it really shouldn’t matter who reported it if the content itself was indeed being distributed without a proper license,” said Tochner. “We responded quickly to the possibility that there was infringing content to ensure that if it existed it would be promptly removed from our service.”

Within two hours, the grid set the region access to private, so that only the region owner could visit it, and contacted the region owner. Eventually, the grid took down all the content.

Kitely requires a formal complaint about any content to be done by clicking a Report World link on the world’s World Page, sending an email or internal message, posting the information on the forum or filing a DCMA take down notice on their website copyright notice link.

Some grid owners claim that they cannot remove or limit access to content before receiving a formal complaint from the content author or before being served with a formal DMCA. In fact, that is one of the excuses for infringing content in OpenSim and virtual worlds, in addition to 10 other excuses Maria Korolov wrote about last year.

But grids are increasingly getting more proactive when it comes to protecting creator rights on their platforms.

For example, DigiWorldz recently banned use of Athena Mesh bodies following informal complains on social media forums, even without formal DCMA notice or filing. The grid took the action after confirming with the original author that use of the meshes was violating copyrights.

 

Latest posts by David Kariuki (see all)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-cuore-spezzato/feed/ 0 57164
Famed Apple leaker dishes on the art of iPhone rumors and the beauty of e-waste https://earlybirdsinvest.com/famed-apple-leaker-dishes-on-the-art-of-iphone-rumors-and-the-beauty-of-e-waste/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/famed-apple-leaker-dishes-on-the-art-of-iphone-rumors-and-the-beauty-of-e-waste/#respond Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:20:33 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/famed-apple-leaker-dishes-on-the-art-of-iphone-rumors-and-the-beauty-of-e-waste/

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/famed-apple-leaker-dishes-on-the-art-of-iphone-rumors-and-the-beauty-of-e-waste/feed/ 0 52987
CoinDCX quashes Coinbase buyout rumors following cyber heist https://earlybirdsinvest.com/coindcx-quashes-coinbase-buyout-rumors-following-cyber-heist/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/coindcx-quashes-coinbase-buyout-rumors-following-cyber-heist/#respond Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:52:47 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/coindcx-quashes-coinbase-buyout-rumors-following-cyber-heist/

Sumit Gupta, CEO of Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX, has publicly denied reports suggesting the company is in acquisition talks with US-based crypto platform Coinbase.

The speculation emerged after a Livemint report claimed that negotiations were underway between the two crypto trading platforms.

However, Gupta quickly dismissed the claims in a July 29 post on X (formerly Twitter), saying:

“Ignore the rumours! CoinDCX is ‘super focused’ on building for India’s crypto story and not up for sale!”

Mridul Gupta, a co-founder and senior executive at CoinDCX, also shared this view and labeled the report “false.” He noted that rather than planning an exit, the company is actively expanding and recruiting talent across various departments.

Coinbase is the largest US-based crypto trading platform. The firm halted its Indian operations in 2022 under regulatory pressure. re-entered India in March after it secured a key regulatory nod from India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

Since then, the exchange has made no further announcements about its plan for the Asian country.

CoinDCX security breach

The rumors surfaced after a $44 million security breach on CoinDCX, allegedly orchestrated by North Korea’s Lazarus Group.

Blockchain analytics firm Cyvers identified attack patterns consistent with previous Lazarus operations, including cross-chain bridges and Tornado Cash to obscure fund flows.

According to Cyvers, the attackers likely exploited exposed API keys or misconfigured backend systems, allowing them to transfer assets from the Solana blockchain to Ethereum and launder them anonymously.

In response to the exploit, CoinDCX introduced an $11 million bounty initiative offering up to 25% of recovered assets. The program aims to engage ethical hackers, researchers, and blockchain firms in asset recovery efforts.

Despite this attack, CoinDCX remains one of India’s largest digital asset platforms, managing over $161 million in customer assets and processing around $14 million in daily trading volume, according to CoinMarketCap data

Mentioned in this article
]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/coindcx-quashes-coinbase-buyout-rumors-following-cyber-heist/feed/ 0 50299
Solana’s Pump.Fun Loses Steam With Exit Scam Rumors, LetsBonk.Fun Claims 54% Of Total Market Share https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solanas-pump-fun-loses-steam-with-exit-scam-rumors-letsbonk-fun-claims-54-of-total-market-share/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solanas-pump-fun-loses-steam-with-exit-scam-rumors-letsbonk-fun-claims-54-of-total-market-share/#respond Tue, 08 Jul 2025 16:04:02 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solanas-pump-fun-loses-steam-with-exit-scam-rumors-letsbonk-fun-claims-54-of-total-market-share/

Solana meme coin launchpad Pump.fun has lost a significant chunk of its market share to LetsBonk.fun. This comes just ahead of the former’s token generation event, in which the launchpad could raise up to $4 billion. 

Solana’s Pump.fun Loses Dominance To LetsBonk.fun

In an X post, Solana News revealed that Pump.fun has hit a new all-time low with just a 36% market share, while LetsBonk.fun’s market share has surged to 54%. Jup data also confirms this development. At press time, LetsBonk boasts a market share of 48.90%, with a 24-hour trading volume of $539 million. On the other hand, Pump boasts a market share of 39.80%, with a 24-hour trading volume of $438 million. 

Related Reading

This development comes amid Pump.fun’s proposed public token sale, scheduled for July 12. Well-known Solana influencer Lynk has described this token sale as the “final scam” for the meme coin launchpad. The platform has been under heavy criticism for the amount of money that it has extracted from the Solana ecosystem, without incentivizing community members in any way. 

Solana
Source: Solana News on X

Some community members had expected Pump.fun to airdrop its token to rewards platform users instead of conducting a public token sale. Lynk shared details of the public sale, with the meme coin launchpad planning to sell the ‘PUMP’ tokens $0.004 each. The token boasts a total supply of 1 trillion, meaning a fully diluted value (FDV) of $4 billion. 

However, Pump.fun plans to raise around $600 million from the public token sale, as only $150 billion tokens will be available. The meme coin launchpad is expected to also conduct a private sale in order to complete its $1 billion capital raise effort, as earlier reported

LetsBonk.fun To Keep Dominating Pump.fun

In an X post, crypto influencer Unipcs, also known as ‘Bonk Guy,’ opined that Pump.fun isn’t done, but that LetsBonk.fun will likely continue to be the industry leader. He predicts that this will be the case for the foreseeable future. He outlined several reasons why he believes this would be the case. 

Related Reading

Firstly, he stated that LetsBonk’s pro-creator, pro-people, pro-Solana ecosystem alignment is a massive strength over Pump.fun. Secondly, Bonk Guy remarked that the strong culture of support within the BONK ecosystem is incredibly hard to replicate by any other platform in a short period. 

Furthermore, the crypto influencer remarked that Pump.fun had a lot of momentum as a tokenless protocol, especially with a token generation event (TGE). However, LetsBonk.fun was able to flip the platform during this period. As such, Bonk Guy believes that it is hard to see Pump.fun sustainably recover the kind of market share it once had after the TGE event. 

He also suggested that a “non-negligible amount of activity on Pump.fun is inorganic with a lot os users farming on the platform, hoping that there was going to be an airdrop. As such, the influencer believes that the traffic will dry up once the TGE is over.

Solana
SOL trading at $150 on the 1D chart | Source: SOLUSDT on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solanas-pump-fun-loses-steam-with-exit-scam-rumors-letsbonk-fun-claims-54-of-total-market-share/feed/ 0 46491
Comment on How Kitely responded to infringing content rumors by Koshari Mahana https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-koshari-mahana/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-koshari-mahana/#respond Sun, 29 Jun 2025 13:39:02 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-koshari-mahana/
Fashionistas Island on Kitely, which allegedly infringed copyrights (Image via Fashionistas Island.)

About a week ago, a social media post accused a region on the Kitely grid of distributing infringing content.

Strictly speaking, any infringement complaint needs to be made by the original content creator, through official channels. That wasn’t the case here.

It was a pseudonymous user, DMCA GridSkipper, claiming that the Fashionistas Island had some infringing content — but offered no details about what specifically that content was or whose copyright was being infringed.

“It didn’t even include all the information required by a DMCA, primarily the infringing content was never identified,” Kitely CEO Ilan Tochner told Hypergrid Business. In addition, the person reporting was using a throw-away email address and a brand-new Kitely account.

Despite the lack of concrete information, the grid took action.

“We took the report seriously despite the questionable nature of the reporter’s identity as it really shouldn’t matter who reported it if the content itself was indeed being distributed without a proper license,” said Tochner. “We responded quickly to the possibility that there was infringing content to ensure that if it existed it would be promptly removed from our service.”

Within two hours, the grid set the region access to private, so that only the region owner could visit it, and contacted the region owner. Eventually, the grid took down all the content.

Kitely requires a formal complaint about any content to be done by clicking a Report World link on the world’s World Page, sending an email or internal message, posting the information on the forum or filing a DCMA take down notice on their website copyright notice link.

Some grid owners claim that they cannot remove or limit access to content before receiving a formal complaint from the content author or before being served with a formal DMCA. In fact, that is one of the excuses for infringing content in OpenSim and virtual worlds, in addition to 10 other excuses Maria Korolov wrote about last year.

But grids are increasingly getting more proactive when it comes to protecting creator rights on their platforms.

For example, DigiWorldz recently banned use of Athena Mesh bodies following informal complains on social media forums, even without formal DCMA notice or filing. The grid took the action after confirming with the original author that use of the meshes was violating copyrights.

 

Latest posts by David Kariuki (see all)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-koshari-mahana/feed/ 0 44796
Pi2Day Buzz: AI Hints and Google Rumors Push Pi Token Price Up https://earlybirdsinvest.com/pi2day-buzz-ai-hints-and-google-rumors-push-pi-token-price-up/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/pi2day-buzz-ai-hints-and-google-rumors-push-pi-token-price-up/#respond Thu, 26 Jun 2025 23:56:07 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/pi2day-buzz-ai-hints-and-google-rumors-push-pi-token-price-up/

Pi Network’s token has seen a price increase, driven by discussions of upcoming artificial intelligence (AI) features and speculation about a potential collaboration with Google.

It began after co-founder Nicolas Kokkalis joined a panel on generative AI at the Consensus 2025 conference.

Later, Pi Network shared in a post on X that it would share more details at an event called Pi2Day on June 28. This timing led many to believe that AI could soon play a larger role in the project.

What is a Crypto Wallet? (Explained With Animation)

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe – We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

The Pi token price rose from $0.47 on June 22 to a high of $0.65 by June 25. It later settled around $0.57 but still held most of its gains.

Some users on X suggested the upcoming update might involve a collaboration with Google’s AI team. An X user pointed out that a star icon in a Pi announcement resembled a logo used by Google’s AI division.

Others guessed the update might focus on something called “PiAI”, which could be a separate feature developed by the Pi team.

Not everyone was convinced the announcement would be major. One X user wrote that although some people were hopeful about what’s coming, it would be better to “lower their expectations”.

Recently, Pi Network announced a $100 million fund to support startups building on its mobile-first blockchain. What did the team say about it? Read the full story.

Having completed a Master’s degree in Economics, Politics, and Cultures of the East Asia region, Aaron has written scientific papers analyzing the differences between Western and Collective forms of capitalism in the post-World War II era.
With close to a decade of experience in the FinTech industry, Aaron understands all of the biggest issues and struggles that crypto enthusiasts face. He’s a passionate analyst who is concerned with data-driven and fact-based content, as well as that which speaks to both Web3 natives and industry newcomers.
Aaron is the go-to person for everything and anything related to digital currencies. With a huge passion for blockchain & Web3 education, Aaron strives to transform the space as we know it, and make it more approachable to complete beginners.
Aaron has been quoted by multiple established outlets, and is a published author himself. Even during his free time, he enjoys researching the market trends, and looking for the next supernova.


]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/pi2day-buzz-ai-hints-and-google-rumors-push-pi-token-price-up/feed/ 0 44312
Comment on How Kitely responded to infringing content rumors by Freda Frostbite https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-freda-frostbite/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-freda-frostbite/#respond Sat, 21 Jun 2025 00:25:58 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-freda-frostbite/
Fashionistas Island on Kitely, which allegedly infringed copyrights (Image via Fashionistas Island.)

About a week ago, a social media post accused a region on the Kitely grid of distributing infringing content.

Strictly speaking, any infringement complaint needs to be made by the original content creator, through official channels. That wasn’t the case here.

It was a pseudonymous user, DMCA GridSkipper, claiming that the Fashionistas Island had some infringing content — but offered no details about what specifically that content was or whose copyright was being infringed.

“It didn’t even include all the information required by a DMCA, primarily the infringing content was never identified,” Kitely CEO Ilan Tochner told Hypergrid Business. In addition, the person reporting was using a throw-away email address and a brand-new Kitely account.

Despite the lack of concrete information, the grid took action.

“We took the report seriously despite the questionable nature of the reporter’s identity as it really shouldn’t matter who reported it if the content itself was indeed being distributed without a proper license,” said Tochner. “We responded quickly to the possibility that there was infringing content to ensure that if it existed it would be promptly removed from our service.”

Within two hours, the grid set the region access to private, so that only the region owner could visit it, and contacted the region owner. Eventually, the grid took down all the content.

Kitely requires a formal complaint about any content to be done by clicking a Report World link on the world’s World Page, sending an email or internal message, posting the information on the forum or filing a DCMA take down notice on their website copyright notice link.

Some grid owners claim that they cannot remove or limit access to content before receiving a formal complaint from the content author or before being served with a formal DMCA. In fact, that is one of the excuses for infringing content in OpenSim and virtual worlds, in addition to 10 other excuses Maria Korolov wrote about last year.

But grids are increasingly getting more proactive when it comes to protecting creator rights on their platforms.

For example, DigiWorldz recently banned use of Athena Mesh bodies following informal complains on social media forums, even without formal DCMA notice or filing. The grid took the action after confirming with the original author that use of the meshes was violating copyrights.

 

Latest posts by David Kariuki (see all)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-freda-frostbite/feed/ 0 43203
Comment on How Kitely responded to infringing content rumors by Arielle https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-arielle/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-arielle/#respond Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:25:11 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-arielle/
Fashionistas Island on Kitely, which allegedly infringed copyrights (Image via Fashionistas Island.)

About a week ago, a social media post accused a region on the Kitely grid of distributing infringing content.

Strictly speaking, any infringement complaint needs to be made by the original content creator, through official channels. That wasn’t the case here.

It was a pseudonymous user, DMCA GridSkipper, claiming that the Fashionistas Island had some infringing content — but offered no details about what specifically that content was or whose copyright was being infringed.

“It didn’t even include all the information required by a DMCA, primarily the infringing content was never identified,” Kitely CEO Ilan Tochner told Hypergrid Business. In addition, the person reporting was using a throw-away email address and a brand-new Kitely account.

Despite the lack of concrete information, the grid took action.

“We took the report seriously despite the questionable nature of the reporter’s identity as it really shouldn’t matter who reported it if the content itself was indeed being distributed without a proper license,” said Tochner. “We responded quickly to the possibility that there was infringing content to ensure that if it existed it would be promptly removed from our service.”

Within two hours, the grid set the region access to private, so that only the region owner could visit it, and contacted the region owner. Eventually, the grid took down all the content.

Kitely requires a formal complaint about any content to be done by clicking a Report World link on the world’s World Page, sending an email or internal message, posting the information on the forum or filing a DCMA take down notice on their website copyright notice link.

Some grid owners claim that they cannot remove or limit access to content before receiving a formal complaint from the content author or before being served with a formal DMCA. In fact, that is one of the excuses for infringing content in OpenSim and virtual worlds, in addition to 10 other excuses Maria Korolov wrote about last year.

But grids are increasingly getting more proactive when it comes to protecting creator rights on their platforms.

For example, DigiWorldz recently banned use of Athena Mesh bodies following informal complains on social media forums, even without formal DCMA notice or filing. The grid took the action after confirming with the original author that use of the meshes was violating copyrights.

 

Latest posts by David Kariuki (see all)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/comment-on-how-kitely-responded-to-infringing-content-rumors-by-arielle/feed/ 0 41212
XRP Sell-Off Rumors Swirl After Expert Questions Ripple’s War Chest https://earlybirdsinvest.com/xrp-sell-off-rumors-swirl-after-expert-questions-ripples-war-chest/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/xrp-sell-off-rumors-swirl-after-expert-questions-ripples-war-chest/#respond Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:06:17 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/xrp-sell-off-rumors-swirl-after-expert-questions-ripples-war-chest/

Reason to trust

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed

The highest standards in reporting and publishing

Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality

Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.

CoinRoutes chief executive Dave Weisberger detonated a fresh round of anxiety in the XRP market on Monday when he asked, on Scott Melker’s podcast, whether Ripple Labs could finance a takeover of Circle “for $10 to $20 billion” without off-loading roughly $10 billion in XRP. “Who’s going to buy the $10 billion worth of XRP they would need to sell out of their treasury?” Weisberger said, warning that a sudden supply surge could overwhelm order books and “hammer the price.”

Is A XRP Sell-Off Conceivable?

Within hours, pro-XRP attorney Fred Rispoli fired back on X. “I love @daveweisberger1, but on this point he is mcgloning so hard,” he wrote, invoking Bloomberg strategist Mike McGlone’s reputation for bearish hyperbole. “Just based on what I’m getting offered for my Ripple shares on the secondary market, I don’t think Ripple would even have to sell one XRP to buy Circle.” Rispoli agreed that Ripple cannot raise $10 billion in pure cash, yet insisted the company could “easily afford the acquisition for a mix of cash and debt” and a heavy equity-swap.

Related Reading

When Weisberger replied that Circle’s board would likely demand hard dollars unless it accepted Ripple equity or XRP “without a haircut,” Rispoli dug in. “No way to get $10B in cash—and $10B is too high anyway,” he wrote, citing late-2024 private-research valuations that placed Ripple at $15 billion excluding its ~36 billion escrowed XRP. If Circle’s price tag fell to $7–9 billion, he said, Ripple could close with “$1–3 billion cash on hand, a heavy stock exchange, and debt,” especially with “all that GCC money sloshing around crypto world right now.” Rispoli conceded it would be “a reach” but “doable without meaningfully selling XRP.”

Weisberger acknowledged the math—“That’s a reasonable analysis,” he wrote—yet cautioned that any price at the upper end of Rispoli’s range “could be some short-term pain for us XRP holders.”

Ripple’s tender-offer buyback in January 2024 valued the company at $11.3 billion, disclosing more than $1 billion in cash and about $25 billion in digital assets—mostly XRP—on its books. The firm still controls roughly 52 billion XRP (about 40 percent of supply), though 36 billion sit in timed escrow releases, limiting immediate access. At today’s $2.20 spot price, the spendable portion is worth a little under $35 billion, but moving even a fraction quickly would collide with thin venue depth—a point Weisberger hammered home.

Related Reading

Ripple’s cash pile also shrank after its $1.25 billion purchase of prime broker Hidden Road in April, a deal settled with a blend of cash, equity and RLUSD stablecoins. That acquisition suggests the company prefers hybrid structures, bolstering Rispoli’s claim that Treasury XRP need not flood the market.

Is Circle Even For Sale?

The debate may be academic. Circle, issuer of USDC, has repeatedly declared it “not for sale” while marching toward a New York Stock Exchange listing that now targets a $7.2 billion valuation. Ripple’s rumored approach earlier this spring reportedly topped $5 billion, well below Weisberger’s stress case and within Rispoli’s “doable” band, but Circle rebuffed the talks and updated its S-1 two weeks later, enlarging the float rather than seeking a buyer.

Strategically, Ripple already fields its own dollar-token RLUSD, launched in January and positioned by president Monica Long as “complementary to XRP, not a competitor.” Absorbing USDC’s issuer would instantly rocket Ripple towards the size of Tether.

Even under Rispoli’s optimistic structure, Ripple might still need to liquidate several hundred million dollars’ worth of XRP for working capital and closing costs. At current volumes, unloading just 500 million XRP (≈ $1.1 billion) would equal half a week of global turnover—enough to distort price unless executed as private blocks.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.19.

XRP price
XRP price, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/xrp-sell-off-rumors-swirl-after-expert-questions-ripples-war-chest/feed/ 0 39908