recommend – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com Latest Crypto News Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:12:28 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.8 https://i0.wp.com/earlybirdsinvest.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cropped-New-Project-2024-12-17T235703.455.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 recommend – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com 32 32 240146708 As an Android expert, here are 7 phones I don’t recommend buying https://earlybirdsinvest.com/as-an-android-expert-here-are-7-phones-i-dont-recommend-buying/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/as-an-android-expert-here-are-7-phones-i-dont-recommend-buying/#respond Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:12:28 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/as-an-android-expert-here-are-7-phones-i-dont-recommend-buying/
Motorola Moto G 5G 2025 home screen

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

Here at Android Authority, we spend a lot of time talking about the best Android phones you can buy at any given time. Want a phone with great cameras? Long battery life? Something at a low price? We know exactly the right phone for you.

But there’s another side to that coin: the Android phones you shouldn’t buy. Which phones are you better off skipping? As someone who’s been reviewing and writing about Android phones for a decade, that’s what I’m here to answer.

While there are endless Android phones from unknown brands on Amazon and other online retailers that you should always avoid, I’m focusing this list on major Android phones that you’re likely already considering. Also, while some of the phones here are ones we’ve previously recommended, they’re not necessarily the best purchase in August 2025.

Got it? Great. Without further ado, here are seven Android phones I don’t recommend buying right now.

What do you think is the worst Android phone to buy in August 2025?

0 votes

Google Pixel 9

Google Pixel 9 in Wintergreen color held in person's left hand showing back

C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

Pixel 9

My first couple of picks may seem contradictory, as they’re some of the highest-rated phones from last year, but there’s a good reason for their inclusion on this list. It starts with the base model Google Pixel 9.

The main reason not to buy the Pixel 9 is that the Pixel 10 is set to be announced on August 20, and it’s shaping up to be a significant upgrade. The Pixel 10 is expected to feature a new 5x telephoto camera (something the Pixel 9 doesn’t have), Qi2 wireless charging with built-in magnets, a larger battery, and slightly faster wired charging.

Perhaps more important is the Tensor G5 chip that’ll be inside the Pixel 10. It’s widely believed that the G5 will not only be Google’s first 3nm chip, but it will also be the first one manufactured by TSMC. Nothing is confirmed until we get our hands on the phone, but this could result in substantial performance and efficiency upgrades even compared to the Pixel 9’s Tensor G4 chipset.

Given how significant an upgrade we expect the Pixel 10 to be, buying a Pixel 9 less than two weeks before the new model gets here isn’t the best idea. I’d recommend waiting to buy the Pixel 10 if it’s as good as we suspect, and if not, you should be able to get the Pixel 9 at a heavily discounted price once its successor arrives.

Google Pixel 9 Pro/9 Pro XL/9 Pro Fold

Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Pixel 9 Pro

Ryan Whitwam / Android Authority

Left: Pixel 9 Pro, Right: Pixel 9 Pro Fold

My next few phones to avoid are grouped together in one section, as my buying advice is the same for all three of them. I’m talking about the Google Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro XL, and Pixel 9 Pro Fold. In addition to the regular Pixel 10, we also expect Google to announce new Pro phones at its August 20 event — including the Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro Fold.

Unlike the Pixel 10, none of the Pixel 10 Pro models are reported to get new camera hardware. However, other upgrades — such as Qi2 magnetic charging, larger batteries, faster wired charging, and the Tensor G5 chip — are all on the table.

It’s worth waiting just a little while longer for the Pixel 10 Pro to get here.

While the reasons to wait are slightly different, the same logic applies as it does to the base Pixel 9. If you’re debating buying a Pixel 9 Pro model, it’s worth waiting just a little while longer for the Pixel 10 Pro to get here. At that point, you can decide if the new phones are worth buying, or if you’d rather get last year’s models at a (likely) discounted price.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge standing hero

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

Google isn’t the only company with Android phones that you should avoid buying right now. Looking at Samsung, I find it pretty hard to recommend anyone purchase the Galaxy S25 Edge.

My colleague Ryan Haines gave the Galaxy S25 Edge a tepid 3 out of 5 in his review, criticizing the Edge’s poor thermals, lack of a telephoto camera, weak battery life, and slow charging. For a phone that costs $1,100, the Galaxy S25 Edge just isn’t enough.

The Galaxy S25 Edge has been a difficult recommendation since its launch in May, but recent Galaxy S26 Edge rumors have further reinforced that point. One rumor claims that the S26 Edge will be 0.3mm thinner than the S25 Edge while simultaneously packing a larger 4,400mAh battery — potentially fixing one of our biggest issues with the current Edge.

Even more noteworthy is an exclusive report that Android Authority published in July, where we found evidence that Samsung will discontinue the Galaxy S26 Plus next year and replace it with the Galaxy S26 Edge. This means we could see the S26 Edge released much earlier in the year than previously expected. It also means that the Galaxy S25 Edge may be outdated in just a few months, so buying it right now isn’t the best idea.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review image 4

Rushil Agrawal / Android Authority

Sticking with Samsung, the company has another ho-hum phone on its hands with the Galaxy A36 5G. The A36 is a $400 handset that, at least on the surface, doesn’t look too bad. With a big AMOLED panel, solid hardware, and good battery life, what’s not to like?

As it turns out, a fair amount. In our Galaxy A36 5G review, my colleague Rushil found numerous issues with the phone — one of the most damning being poor performance. Not only does the Exynos 1380 chipset not perform well in benchmarks, but it’s also sluggish for tasks as simple as scrolling through apps or opening the camera. Paired with a super slow fingerprint sensor, the A36 is a phone that’ll test your patience, and not in a good way.

The good news is that there are far better smartphones available at a similar price. The Google Pixel 9a is one of the best phones we’ve reviewed this year, touting great cameras, excellent software updates, reliable battery life, and good performance. It also has a much better fingerprint sensor. The Pixel 9a is more expensive at $499, but at the time of publication, it’s on sale for just $399.

The $400 Moto G Stylus (2025) is another good alternative. And if you’re okay with some possible carrier quirks, the Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro are better buys, too. There are lots of great Android phones available in the ~$400 range, but the Galaxy A36 5G isn’t one of them.

Motorola Moto G (2025)

Motorola Moto G 5G 2025 rear hero

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

Speaking of Moto G phones, there’s another one in Motorola’s current portfolio that’s better left untouched. The Moto G (2025) features a nice design and a decent display, and at just $200, it appears to be an incredible bargain. However, this is one of those cases where appearances can be deceiving.

Ryan didn’t beat around the bush in our Moto G (2025) review, simply saying that he doesn’t think you should buy the phone — and I fully agree with him. The Moto G (2025) is plagued with slow performance, disappointing cameras, weak water resistance, and a terrible software update policy. (Motorola promises just two years of Android OS updates.)

You may be willing to overlook a few compromises with a phone as cheap as the Moto G (2025), but the fact is that you can do a lot better for your money. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has the same $200 price tag, but it’s a better phone overall. If you live outside of the US or are okay with some possible carrier issues, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is an unbelievable bargain for just $279.

Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/as-an-android-expert-here-are-7-phones-i-dont-recommend-buying/feed/ 0 52475
Legal experts recommend flexible approach for SEC to define tokens as securities https://earlybirdsinvest.com/legal-experts-recommend-flexible-approach-for-sec-to-define-tokens-as-securities/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/legal-experts-recommend-flexible-approach-for-sec-to-define-tokens-as-securities/#respond Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:02:47 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/legal-experts-recommend-flexible-approach-for-sec-to-define-tokens-as-securities/

The DeFi Education Fund (DEF) submitted a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 18 proposing five core principles for creating a “token safe harbor” framework to support decentralized finance initiatives while broader regulatory legislation is pending.

The recommendations aim to help the SEC structure a time-limited exemption for token projects developing toward decentralization, offering a regulatory environment that facilitates disclosure without prematurely classifying assets as securities.

Technology-agnostic regulation

The DEF emphasized that any safe harbor should adopt a technology-agnostic approach. The framework should address the risks of activities rather than prescribing rules for specific blockchain models or technical implementations. 

The letter warned against entrenching particular technologies, stating that it could stifle innovation if the SEC inadvertently favors specific consensus mechanisms or architectural designs.

Regarding eligibility, DEF argued that the safe harbor should be open to a wide range of projects that intend to decentralize. Rather than evaluating a token’s status only at its genesis, the SEC should allow already-distributed tokens to qualify, provided they meet decentralization goals. 

It argued that broad eligibility criteria are necessary to ensure the inclusion of projects launched before establishing a clear regulatory framework for future compliance pathways. 

Regarding disclosure requirements, the DEF advocated for carefully calibrated obligations that balance material information needs with the realities faced by early-stage development teams. 

The group suggested disclosures focused on source code transparency, token economics, governance structures, team and insider activities, cybersecurity audits, and development roadmaps.

The DEF also proposed periodic disclosures throughout the safe harbor period, with consideration given to streamlining compliance through API connectivity and blockchain automation. Additional compliance measures, such as lock-up periods for insiders, could help align incentives toward decentralization without overburdening projects.

Clear exit criteria

The letter stressed the importance of establishing a clear “Exit Test” that defines when a project has sufficiently decentralized to no longer be considered a security under US law.

Key criteria for passing the Exit Test would include maximum transparency, permissionless participation, user custody of assets, lack of centralized control, fully automated transaction processes, and the absence of retained economic authority by any single group.

The DEF recommended a realistic timeframe for projects to meet these benchmarks, such as three to four years. Projects that fail to meet the criteria within the initial window can apply for an extended safe harbor period, provided they demonstrate good faith efforts to decentralize.

A critical component of the DEF’s proposal involved protections for secondary market participants.

While a token remains within the safe harbor, intermediaries supporting its trading, such as digital asset exchanges and market makers, should not be required to register as broker-dealers or securities exchanges.

Comprehensive framework needed

The DEF noted that exempting infrastructure providers from traditional securities regulations would reduce legal uncertainty and foster broader participation in decentralized markets.

While supporting the creation of a token safe harbor, the DEF ultimately called for Congress to develop a comprehensive legislative framework for digital assets. 

The organization expressed that durable legal clarity must come from statute rather than temporary regulatory carve-outs. Nevertheless, a well-structured safe harbor could protect investors and developers while the longer lawmaking process unfolds.

The DEF concluded its letter by committing to ongoing engagement with the SEC and the broader crypto community. The organization also indicated that it would be publishing its recommendations publicly to solicit further feedback.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/legal-experts-recommend-flexible-approach-for-sec-to-define-tokens-as-securities/feed/ 0 31594