June 27th How quickly can you see a wide range of Bitcoin mortgages?

At a prominent moment of the convergence of cryptocurrency and traditional finances, Michael Saylor of Strategy launched a public dialogue with US Federal Housing and Finance Agency (FHFA) director William Prute regarding the integration of Bitcoin into mainstream mortgages. This engagement focuses on Silorer’s proposal to share a unique Bitcoin credit model designed to assess loan risk using Bitcoin-specific metrics such as volatility and asset coverage. The conversation could show a change in the way federal housing agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac value borrower assets following Pulte’s announcement that FHFA is investigating whether cryptocurrency holdings can play a role in mortgage eligibility. The exchange highlights not only the role of Bitcoin maturation in financial planning, but it also may affect the way federal regulators incorporate digital assets into their home lending frameworks.

Was William Pulte, FHFA Director, Saylor Orange Pill Us?

In a recent development, highlighting the intersection of digital assets and traditional finance, Micro Strategy Executive Director Michael Saylor has been published with William Parte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) on the potential Bitcoin-backed mortgage model. Saylor has offered to share the strategy’s own Bitcoin credit model. It analyzes loan risk and pricing based on key Bitcoin-specific metrics such as price volatility, asset viewing forecasts, and collateral coverage. The outreach follows Pulte’s statement that FHFA will study how cryptocurrency holdings are considered in mortgage eligibility assessments. This is an announcement that federal housing agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may be revisiting Light Heritage Loan Standards for U.S. households’ evolved asset portfolios.

Given its role in overseeing government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA’s willingness to investigate cryptocurrency integration is particularly noteworthy given that cryptocurrencies must be converted into US dollars and held in regulated institutions before they can be counted in the calculation of borrower assets. Until the beginning of this year, regulations such as the SEC’s now repeated SAB 121 effectively prevented mainstream financial institutions from accepting crypto assets as collateral for loans. By removing these accounting restrictions, it opens up new opportunities for digital assets to be recognized in the underwriting framework, potentially allowing borrowers to take advantage of Bitcoin Holding without liquidation.

Saylor’s intervention adds technical depth to this policy conversation by introducing a credit model specialized for the characteristics of Bitcoin as collateral. Unlike traditional assets, the volatility, liquidity, and non-sovereign nature of Bitcoin requires clear methods to calculate loan-value ratios, period-based risk spreads, and margin thresholds. His company’s model aims to quantify these variables and support a safer, over-carrier lending structure that can be integrated into existing mortgage products. If regulators adopt or adapt such a framework, they could mark an important step towards mainstreaming crypto-assisted mortgages through established institutions rather than niche providers.

The exchange also arrives amid growing public interest in alternative financing models, particularly among young Americans who hold an unbalanced share of net worth in digital assets. A policy shift from institutions like the FHFA could justify the use of Bitcoin as a form of wealth in housing finance, and could improve access to homeownership for households from crypto. Whether this indicates a broader consistency between crypto innovation and US housing policy remains to be seen, but the Saylor and Pulte dialogue suggests that such a debate is no longer theoretical.

What is a Bitcoin-supported mortgage? How does it work?

Bitcoin mortgages are a type of loan in which Bitcoin (BTC) is used as collateral rather than traditional down payments. In this structure, the borrower pledges a specified amount of Bitcoin to the lender and holds it in escrow during the mortgage period. The borrower will then receive Fiat Currency (USD) to purchase the property and make monthly repayments, similar to traditional mortgages. These arrangements are usually over-secured. In other words, the value of the pledged Bitcoin exceeds the value of the loan, protecting lenders from price volatility. If the Bitcoin value falls below a certain threshold, borrowers may be required to add BTC collateral or risk liquidation to cover the balance of outstanding payments.

Compared to standard mortgages, Bitcoin-assisted mortgages offer different risk compensation profiles. Traditional mortgages are based on credit history, income documents, and Fiat’s down payments usually between 10% and 20% of the home’s value. By contrast, Bitcoin mortgages can pose to borrowers who are crypto and have wealth, but don’t want to settle their holdings or are unable to. These products can avoid some of the traditional underwriting document hurdles, but introduce new risks regarding asset volatility. Additionally, while professional lenders offer these products, most traditional banks do not accept Bitcoin as a valid asset for mortgage eligibility due to regulatory and balance sheet constraints, this could change if an institution like FHFA expands its asset recognition criteria.

Bitcoin native features such as Multisig wallets and Time Locks enhance security and minimization of trust in lending arrangements. Multisig allows a predefined number of parties to only spend their funds when approving the transaction and reducing the risk of counterparties, but time locking allows transactions to be locked to a specific time or block height, allowing automated loan expiration or repayment terms.

Bitcoin mortgage rates are competitive, but often vary widely depending on lenders, collateral coverage and market conditions. Fees can be lower than unsecured cryptocurrencies, but they are not always on par with the most favorable traditional mortgage rates, especially from government-supported lenders. In some cases, lenders may offer flexible terms to attract borrowers who want to remain exposed to a long-term assessment of BTC while accessing liquidity. However, borrowers can erode the benefits of any rate as they face additional costs such as management fees and escrow fees and risk of margin calls during market slump. Until Bitcoin becomes an asset approved within traditional institutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, rates are unlikely to standardize across the broader lending market.

Driven by a fixed coin supply of 21 million and half cycles every four years, Bitcoin’s deflationary economic model introduces unique dynamics in mortgage lending. In theory, if new supplies are cut in half and the issuance slows down, the bitcoin shortage could increase its value over time. This historically encourages long-term holdings (hodling), making Bitcoin an attractive reserve asset for some. In the mortgage context, this could be reluctant to pledge Bitcoin as collateral, and fear opportunity costs if prices rise dramatically. At the same time, lenders may be cautious about sharp declines that could undermine the collateral value. The success of Bitcoin mortgages over the long term depends on how lenders and regulators manage this volatility, and whether Bitcoin’s deflationary model is considered a stable foundation enough to support large, long-term financial products like mortgages.

Is Saylor too optimistic, or will the lending industry accept Bitcoin?

Michael Saylor’s framing of Bitcoin as a digital asset rather than digital cash defined his entire investment philosophy and led both the corporate strategy of strategy and his broader public advocacy. By treating Bitcoin as a valuable, long-term storage, rather than as a medium of exchange, Saylor dismissed in favour of accumulating and holding spending or transactions with BTC indefinitely. However, this belief naturally led him to explore the mechanisms through which Bitcoin can generate yields. This is a pursuit of worrying about the principles of asset trust maximizing design and P2P. His recent interest in Bitcoin-backed credit models, such as mortgages, reflects his desire to monetize Bitcoin without selling it. However, this approach enters dark territory, especially considering the prominent collapse of past retail-centric crypto lending platforms offering similar promises.

The failures of companies such as celsius, Voyager and Blockfi highlight the inherent risks of trying to extract yields from volatile digital assets in underregulated environments. These companies provided attractive returns for depositors whilst engaging in opaque, leveraged and often inconsistent lending practices. When prices collapsed, the balance sheet also collapsed, and users installed frozen accounts and losses. The yield in Saylor’s version is rooted in collateral against Bitcoin, excess carrier overlook, rather than deducted or re-guaranteed sediment, which may appear more conservative in comparison. However, the underlying tension remains in the fact that Bitcoin is not a risk-free yield generating tool, and introducing debt-based products around it reintroducing credit, counterparty risk, and systemic vulnerabilities into a space designed to theoretically eliminate them.

If federal regulators such as FHFA ultimately approve the use of Bitcoin as a collateral qualifying for a mortgage, the traditional lending industry could be forced to adapt to new classes of assets and borrowers. Banks and government-backed companies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should develop protocols to evaluate, protect and manage digital collateral in accordance with capital requirements and consumer protection regulations. This could bring new revenue streams, borrower demographics and innovation to the mortgage sector, especially among households from young crypto origins who are blessed with traditional standards but are overexposed to digital assets. It could also promote standardization efforts, including regulatory guidance on custody, assessment methods and margin maintenance.

If the federal government establishes a clear and lucrative regulatory framework for Bitcoin-backed mortgages through agencies like FHFA, key players in the banking industry could carefully follow suit. While traditional financial institutions are generally risk averse and highly regulated, they also have a long history of adapting to government-supported policy shifts, especially when they involve guarantees and securitization mechanisms provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The green light from federal authorities reduces legal ambiguity and provides the compliance infrastructure needed for banks to safely evaluate, detain and lend Bitcoin collateral. While some conservative agencies may be able to hesitate due to volatility concerns and reputational risks, others, especially Fintech Forward Banks and banks already seeking custody of digital assets, can view this as a competitive opportunity to leverage the growing demographics of competitive demographics and expand their lending portfolios in highly resident markets.

In an optimistic scenario, if Bitcoin-backed mortgages prove traction and resilient, the lending industry can see a wave of hybrid financial products that combine traditional underwriting and decentralized asset classes. Lenders either offer tiered products with dynamic loan and value ratios based on Bitcoin volatility metrics, or integrate Stablecoins and BTC together to balance risk. Over time, the legitimacy of Bitcoin as a financial asset class may solidify, leading to a new class of secondary markets for potentially tokenized mortgage debt or credit infrastructure. However, this vision depends on whether institutional actors can responsibly manage the volatility and cultural idiosyncraticity of Bitcoin without repeating the speculative overreach that destined for previous lending experiments in the crypto space.

]]> https://earlybirdsinvest.com/how-quickly-can-you-see-a-wide-range-of-bitcoin-mortgages/feed/ 0 44544 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/apple-reportedly-has-a-secret-plan-to-quickly-gain-ground-in-the-ai-race/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/apple-reportedly-has-a-secret-plan-to-quickly-gain-ground-in-the-ai-race/#respond Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:43:18 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/apple-reportedly-has-a-secret-plan-to-quickly-gain-ground-in-the-ai-race/

The European Union’s glossy new Crypto rulebook is finally here, and Crypto’s heavyweights are wasting no time. In the Crypto-Assets (MICA)-regulated market, several well-known exchanges are on track to operate passports in all 27 EU countries. But behind the scenes, regulators are I’m convulsing. This is a major opportunity for the EU Crypto market, but it also tests how well regulators can implement the new rules.

Requires Gemini, Okx and Coinbase

First, Gemini. A Winklevoss-led exchange is nearby Get a license In Malta, that movement Let me It helps all european union. Malta has already distributed licenses to okx and crypto.com. Currently, Luxembourg is reportedly preparing to approve Coinbase. This adds more firepower to the list of MICA-compliant platforms.

Breaking News: MICA adoption in Europe by 2025 will have a major impact on crypto investors. https://t.co/hipqtxlpry #mica #cryptoinvestors #europe2025 pic.twitter.com/xmaqd7gxfa

-Rayan Bibiloni (@Rayan_Bibiloni) June 13, 2025

In theory, once a company obtains a license in one EU country, it operates throughout the bloc. That’s MICA’s promise: seamless access and equal playing fields. but reality It’s even more troublesome.

Regulators raise their eyebrows

Watchdogs across the country are not very sure how fast things are moving, especially in small countries like Malta. Their concern? That Light Touch Review could potentially operate across the EU even if reviewed companies slip through the cracks.

French regulators are particularly concerned. They warned that if this were to be a race to quickly hand out licenses, it could become a patchwork system that would speed up over security. That’s what ESMA, the European Securities Markets Agency I’m looking closely And plans to release a report on it “Regulatory arbitrage law. ”

Discovered: 20+ Next Cryptocurrency Exploding in 2025

Malta says: We know what we are doing

Malta has not retreated. Officials there say they have built the experience and staff to properly handle the Mycal application. They have already approved four licenses and claim that the process is thorough, even if it’s faster than some of the great powers.

24 hours7d30D1Yeverytime

Still, concerns remain. One EU source reportedly said regulators were worried about weight when they set up bars beyond the BLOC for compliance. One regulator is wrong, which affects all 27 countries.

Luxembourg’s Power Play, Ireland’s Crypto Cold Shoulder

Luxembourg will soon issue a Coinbase license. This will be a huge victory for both the country and the exchange. Luxembourg has long been a hub for financial services, but the move will further strengthen its position as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction.

However, Ireland is taking the opposite approach. The central bank has openly criticised the code, and the governor has compared parts of the industry to Ponzi. That hard-line stance may make it even more difficult for Ireland to attract top-class crypto businesses seeking European bases.

Discovery: Next 1000x Ciphers: 10+ Ciphers tokens that could hit 1000X in 2025

What is at risk for users and the market?

mica It is supposed to bring order to the chaos of European crypto regulations. If that works, investors will be protected, the exchange will become clear and innovation will be gained I’ll keep moving. but If national regulators pull in different directions, whole The system is possible buckle.

The global crypto market is worth over $3 trillion. Such money requires guardrails, not loopholes. Everyone is trying to avoid the confusion of another FTX size, but it has proven difficult to balance safety and speed.

What’s coming next

All eyes are in the next move in ESMA. Do they tighten the standards? Let me Member countries Continued In Interpret What’s their way? The way Europe handles this rollout sets the tone of global crypto regulations. The future of the EU crypto market may depend on how ESMA handles growing concerns about regulatory arbitrages.

The clock is ticking every moment. And no one wants to be a weak link.

Discover: 20+ Next Cryptographs to Explode in 2025

For the latest market updates, please join us in the discrepancy in 99bitcoins news here

Why you can trust 99 Bitcoin?

Over 10 years

Founded in 2013, 99 Bitcoin team members have been experts in crypto since the early days of Bitcoin.

90 hours+

Weekly research

100k+

Monthly Readers

50+

Expert Contributors

2000+

Crypto project reviewed

Follow 99 Bitcoin on Google News Feed

Provide the latest updates, trends and insights directly to your fingertips. Subscribe now!

Subscribe now

Banks in South Korea are reportedly rushing to partner with crypto firms as the country’s digital asset regulations become less restrictive.

Last week, South Korea’s Financial Services Commission announced the country would launch a pilot program in the second half of 2025 enabling 3,500 corporate entities to buy crypto for investment and financial purposes.

Corporate crypto transactions have been banned in the country since 2017.

South Korean media outlet NewsPim reports that Upbit, the largest exchange in the country, has partnered with K Bank. South Korea’s second-largest exchange, Bithumb, also reportedly shifted its partnership from Nonghyup Bank to KB Kookmin Bank, the largest bank in the country.

The FSC says the pilot program is expected to expand the level of corporate participation in the crypto sector. The regulator notes that it also plans to strengthen safeguard measures surrounding the sector.

“A set of transaction guidelines will be prepared to provide appropriate information for banks to strengthen verification of the purpose of transactions and the origin of funds, for virtual asset exchanges to make use of third-party custody and management services, and to expand information disclosures made available to investors. Since qualified professional investors may demonstrate different levels of investment capacities, the decision to ultimately issue a real-name verified account will be left to the thorough screening process from banks and virtual asset exchanges.” 

Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

&nbsp

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Generated Image: Midjourney