Pennsylvania lawmaker Ben Waxman, a Democrat, has introduced a bill that would prevent public officials from owning or transacting in digital assets while in office.

The proposal, known as the House Bill 1812 (HB1812), aims to amend the state’s ethics and financial disclosure laws and extend those restrictions to officials’ immediate families.

The legislation covers a broad spectrum of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, memecoins, NFTs, and stablecoins, and would apply both during an official’s term and for one year after leaving office.

Under the proposal, public officials must divest any digital holdings within 90 days of assuming office or from the bill’s effective date. The prohibition would extend beyond direct ownership, applying to assets held through companies, trusts, funds, or financial products such as derivatives and ETFs.

Lawmakers must also disclose any digital asset holdings worth more than $1,000 in their annual financial statements.

Meanwhile, violations of the proposed law could trigger significant consequences.

Ethics breaches in Pennsylvania can carry felony charges, meaning that public officials who fail to comply could face civil penalties of up to $50,000 or even prison time.

According to the crypto legislation tracking platform Bitcoin Laws, HB1812 has only cleared the first committee stage, the second of six steps required before it could become law.

Democrats raise efforts to curb digital asset conflicts

Waxman’s proposal aligns with a growing effort among Democratic lawmakers to curb potential conflicts of interest tied to digital assets.

Earlier this year, Congressman Sam Liccardo proposed legislation to prevent government officials and their families from profiting from cryptocurrencies, including memecoins.

His bill sought to ban elected officials, spouses, and dependent children from issuing, promoting, or financially benefiting from digital securities and commodities, calling the measure “a way to make corruption criminal again.”

Over the years, the Democratic Party has taken a consistently cautious stance toward crypto.

Senior lawmakers such as Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Maxine Waters have argued that public officials’ involvement in digital asset markets, illustrated most recently by figures like President Donald Trump, raises ethical and legal concerns.

They have also continued highlighting risks tied to the industry, ranging from market volatility to the potential for misuse in illicit finance.

Mentioned in this article

A Pennsylvania NFT trader faces up to six years in prison after pleading guilty to federal tax fraud charges for failing to report $13 million in profits from CryptoPunk NFT sales. Waylon Wilcox, 45, deliberately concealed 97 high-value NFT transactions over two years, evading approximately $3.3 million in taxes in what prosecutors describe as one of the first major U.S. cases involving NFT-related tax evasion.

• Wilcox underreported income by $8.5 million in 2021 and $4.6 million in 2022 from CryptoPunk sales, selecting “no” when asked about cryptocurrency transactions on tax forms.

• The IRS uncovered the fraud by tracing blockchain records and exchange data, demonstrating their improving ability to link crypto transactions to individuals.

• The case coincides with intensified IRS focus on cryptocurrency tax compliance ahead of the April 15 deadline.

• This prosecution could establish a precedent for how NFT profits are treated under tax law and the serious consequences of evasion.

The Fraud Scheme Details

Court documents reveal that Wilcox conducted 62 CryptoPunk sales in 2021, generating $7.4 million, and another 35 sales in 2022, generating $4.9 million. Despite these substantial profits, he falsely claimed on his tax forms to have no involvement with digital asset transactions.

This deliberate misrepresentation allowed Wilcox to underpay $2.1 million in taxes for 2021 and $1.1 million for 2022. The guilty plea was entered on April 9, 2025, with sentencing expected to include imprisonment, supervised release, and additional fines.

IRS Cryptocurrency Compliance Efforts

This case highlights the IRS’s increasingly sophisticated approach to tracking cryptocurrency transactions. The agency used blockchain analytics tools to trace Wilcox’s sales and match them to his identity, breaking through the perceived anonymity of crypto wallets.

Philadelphia Field Office Special Agent Yury Kruty stated, “IRS Criminal Investigation is committed to unravelling complex financial schemes involving virtual currencies and non-fungible token (NFT) transactions designed to conceal taxable income. He continued, “In today’s economic environment, it’s more important than ever that the American people feel confident that everyone is playing by the rules and paying the taxes they owe.”

The IRS issued guidance in 2023, specifically requiring NFT gain and loss reporting. Using a “look-through analysis,” the IRS will determine if an NFT is a collectible based on its associated asset. For example, NFTs tied to gems or art would be considered collectibles, subject to a higher tax rate of up to 28%. Public comments were solicited to refine this approach.

Impact on the NFT Market

Despite regulatory scrutiny and legal cases like Wilcox’s, the CryptoPunk collection continues to maintain significant market value. While trading volume has dropped approximately 70% from its 2021 peak, CryptoPunks remains the largest NFT collection with a floor price that has stabilized at around $68,000.

Yuga Labs, which acquired CryptoPunks in 2022, has preserved the collection’s legacy despite initial concerns about commercialization. The ongoing value of these digital assets makes clear why tax authorities are paying increased attention to the sector.

Tax Implications and Blockchain’s Transparency Paradox

The Wilcox case establishes an important precedent for how NFT profits are treated under tax law and the serious consequences of evasion. NFT sales are typically taxed as capital gains or ordinary income depending on holding periods, with the same reporting requirements as traditional assets.

The Wilcox case also exposes an interesting paradox in blockchain technology. While all transactions are recorded on a public ledger, the pseudonymous nature of wallets creates an illusion of privacy that some traders mistakenly believe shields them from tax obligations.

In reality, as this case demonstrates, the IRS has become adept at connecting wallet addresses to real identities through exchange records, withdrawal patterns, and other investigative techniques. The permanent nature of blockchain records means evidence of transactions remains available indefinitely for future investigation.