Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In the dynamic financial sector, Bitcoin ETFs are rapidly gaining ground against their gold counterparts, with inflows pushing total assets under management toward record highs. Bitcoin ETFs are set to overtake gold ETFs in total assets under management.

Bitcoin ETFs Cement Role As Institutional Gateway To Crypto

Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are on the brink of making history globally. In an X post, the Kobeissi Letter, an industry-leading commentary on global capital markets, has revealed that BTC ETFs are on track to surpass Gold ETFs in assets under management (AUM) for the first time in history, marking a historic milestone in global markets. Over the past 12 months, AUM in the largest cryptocurrency ETFs has doubled to $150 billion, while gold ETFs have climbed 40% to a record of $180 billion.

The comparison highlights how rapidly momentum has shifted. Just three years ago, gold ETFs were five times larger than Bitcoin ETFs. Presently, with accelerating inflows into digital asset products, that gap is narrowing at a historic speed. 

If current trends continue, Bitcoin ETFs could surpass gold ETFs as early as next year. This is a symbolic flip that underscores the rise of crypto from speculative asset to mainstream portfolio allocation.

Lately, ETFs are proving to be the engine behind the current crypto bull market. According to Ucan_Coin, BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, oversees nearly 2,000 funds, with about 1,400 of them being ETFs. Clients buy into these funds, while BlackRock earns fees on the assets under management.

However, the Bitcoin Spot ETF fee is just 0.25%, but the power lies in scale and liquidity. Over the last two years, ETFs have provided the critical fuel for this rally, with nearly 20% of all liquidity entering crypto now flowing directly from ETF products.

As Ucan_Coin highlights, BlackRock’s IBIT stands out. As the chart demonstrates, IBIT is the locomotive pulling the entire market, driving inflows and setting the pace for the broader bull run.

ETF Inflows Signal Rising Institutional Appetite For Bitcoin

The US spot Bitcoin ETFs are gaining remarkable momentum, while generating $5 to $10 billion in daily volume on their most active trading days. Pushpendra Singh, Co-founder of PushpendraTech and SmartViewAi, has explained that this surge is a clear sign that institutional investors are increasingly seeking regulated exposure to Bitcoin, and ETFs are rapidly becoming their preferred gateway.

Despite the ETF boom, Binance continues to dominate the spot market, processing between $10 to $18 billion in daily spot volume and holding a 29% market share. This is more than double the 13% market share currently held by US-based ETFs, and it puts Binance comfortably ahead of other major exchanges in terms of liquidity.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

HodlX Guest Post  Submit Your Post

Blockchain-based organizations and crypto projects have long operated in a minefield of shifting and unclear regulations.

But now, with the full implementation of the EU’s MiCA (Market in Crypto Assets) legislation and speculation about what Trump’s supposed crypto-friendly regulatory outline may look like, there is an air of optimism across the industry.

Despite the positivity echoing from the US, turbulent prices, economic obstacles and crypto’s natural volatility counterweight any favorable developments, leaving the industry in a familiar polarized state.

Crypto exchanges – as the backbone of the entire ecosystem, providing access to thousands of different types of tokens – face the challenge of navigating a patchwork of vague or non-existent legal statuses.

How they handle this unpredictable period will have major implications for the entire industry.

Is enough being done

Whether centralized or decentralized, crypto exchanges serve as a gateway to the Web 3.0 economy – from facilitating market activity and ensuring liquidity to executing token launches and offering fiat on/off-ramps, exchanges serve as an irreplaceable infrastructure piece.

Because exchanges are the primary mechanism granting access to assets with less-than-clear regulatory statuses, they bear the brunt of regulatory scrutiny.

As such, exchanges – particularly CEXs (centralized exchanges) – have been consistently in the crosshairs of national regulators, especially in the US, EU and UK.

Despite a promising outlook resonating from the US, both exchanges must take a more proactive approach toward regulatory compliance.

By and large, the industry has gradually embraced some standard regulatory procedures such as KYC (know your customer).

This is a promising development, but it likely won’t be enough to appease regulators across all markets, especially as some explore how to reel in DeFi.

While the industry has been increasingly open to the more complex and strenuous AML (anti-money laundering) enforcement, this too is often overlooked.

Proper AML enforcement, in addition to KYC, will soon be something exchanges can’t ignore.

When operating within a given jurisdiction, bypassing one or both of these measures is no longer acceptable.

Currently, MiCA doesn’t explicitly regulate full DEXs (decentralized exchanges).

However, DEXs with a degree of centralization can be targeted under MiCA, and the European Commission is investigating how to apply existing financial laws to DeFi protocols, including those governed by DAOS (decentralized autonomous organizations).

Navigating the evolving regulatory landscape represents a thorn in the side of most crypto organizations, but tackling these challenges head-on will provide much-needed stability.

All types of crypto exchanges must understand that the initial challenge of compliance will, in time, bear fruit and that they should view it as a down payment on the future.

Staying ahead of the regulatory curve

CEXs would benefit from actively engaging with regional regulators to demonstrate their willingness to comply with local laws.

This would also help them stay in the loop as new rules emerge, affording them valuable time to make any necessary adjustments.

In addition to ensuring the robustness of KYC and AML protocols, both centralized and decentralized exchanges would be remiss not to conduct voluntary financial auditing to enhance trust.

DEXs would be wise to use reputable third-party services to audit their smart contracts and security frameworks to ensure they are properly protected against increasingly sophisticated threats.

Despite DEXs operating in a legal gray area, implementing on-chain compliance tools and forming self-regulatory coalitions to establish unofficial standards will reduce any potential obstacles if governments take tough stands.

This can be done without undermining decentralization by leveraging cryptographic solutions, and for DAO-operated DEXs, this could be done through hybrid models that embed automated compliance decisions in smart contracts.

In response to crypto’s shifting regulatory environment, exchanges that embrace technological innovations to assist with compliance procedures position themselves for long-term sustainability.

Rapid advances in AI have led to numerous solutions that can help resource-strapped projects and larger blockchain organizations make the necessary regulatory preparations.

Powerful AI tools can be used to monitor transactions and detect suspicious activities in real time, helping to drastically reduce threats that target exchanges and associated wallets.

While the industry has seen a decline in scams and hacks, the recent massive ByBit hack is a cruel reminder of why regulatory processes can’t be ignored.

Combatting fraud and crimes is paramount to the industry’s sustainability, and anticipating future developments requires prioritizing compliance prep.

Without proper readiness for the unpredictability factor of regulatory developments across the globe, crypto exchanges will waste the industry’s recent momentum, ultimately disrupting its potential.

To ensure exchanges maintain their crucial role as Web 3.0 gatekeepers, they must acknowledge that regulatory uncertainty will remain for now.

Amid this speculation and uncertainty, risks should be minimized, and flexibility and adaptability should be maximized to ensure exchanges are ready for any potential scenario.

By staying on top of compliance trends, fostering transparency and implementing strategic legal frameworks, crypto exchanges won’t only remain a pivotal Web 3.0 component but also be in a position to facilitate innovation.

Omri Hanover is the general manager of Gems Trade, a regulated CEX that is part of the Gems ecosystem. With a background in business development and strategy within the blockchain industry, Omri focuses on building sustainable trading infrastructure and fostering meaningful partnerships between projects and users.

Check Latest Headlines on HodlX

Follow Us on Twitter Facebook Telegram

Check out the Latest Industry Announcements  

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Generated Image: Midjourney

For the better part of two years, the stock market has been in an undeniable uptrend, and investors haven’t had to dig too deeply to uncover the catalysts behind this decisive move higher.

A confluence of factors, including a resilient U.S. economy, a reduction in the prevailing rate of inflation (compared to a peak of more than 9%), and better-than-expected corporate earnings have lifted the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 (^GSPC -0.76%), and Nasdaq Composite to numerous record-closing highs.

But among this laundry list of catalysts, none has shone brighter than the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). With AI, software and systems have the capacity to reason and act on their own, and can become more efficient at their assigned tasks, as well as learn new skills, over time.

Image source: Getty Images.

According to a report released by PwC (Sizing the Prize), the AI revolution is expected to boost global productivity by $6.6 trillion come 2030, as well as provide a $9.1 trillion benefit via consumption-side effects. Altogether, AI is forecast to increase worldwide gross domestic product by $15.7 trillion, which is a big enough pie to excite investors.

Not surprisingly, businesses are aggressively investing in AI-data center infrastructure and software solutions to gain first-mover advantages. Many of the “Magnificent Seven” companies are spending tens of billions of dollars to purchase graphics processing units (GPUs) that act as the brains of their high-compute data centers.

Yet in spite of Wall Street’s most-influential businesses putting big bucks to work on the evolution of AI, there’s another trend set to dwarf it in terms of aggregate spending. Over the next decade, S&P 500 companies are on pace to spend in excess of $10 trillion — i.e., average more than $1 trillion per year — on another scorching-hot investment.

S&P 500 companies are set to spend $1 trillion (or more) per year on this trend

What’s even hotter than the AI revolution, in terms of corporate spending? Look no further than (drum roll) corporate buybacks!

Between 2011 and 2017, S&P 500 companies repurchased between $413 billion and $592 billion worth of their stock each year, which works out to an average of around $100 billion to $150 billion per quarter. But things changed in a big way once Donald Trump took office for his first term as president.

Trump’s flagship Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which was signed into law in December 2017, reduced the peak marginal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This represents the lowest peak corporate tax rate since 1939, and it’s put more cash in the coffers of time-tested public companies than they’ve known what to do with.

Excluding the uncertainties tied to the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing lockdowns, S&P 500 companies have purchased a collective $815 billion to $950 billion worth of their own stock on an annual basis since the TCJA went into effect. President Trump has intimated that he’d like to see the peak marginal corporate income tax rate slashed by another 29% for companies that manufacture their products in America.

Based on estimates from Goldman Sachs, S&P 500 stock buybacks are expected to reach a record $1.075 trillion in 2025. With the TCJA making corporate income tax rate cuts permanent, and Trump holding office for the next four years, the trajectory is for share buybacks to progressively increase.

Companies typically undertake share repurchases for three reasons. Firstly, buybacks help to incrementally increase the ownership stakes of existing shareholders, which incents long-term investing. It’s one of the primary reasons Warren Buffett has spent close to $78 billion buying back shares of Berkshire Hathaway stock since mid-2018.

Secondly, it sends a strong message to Wall Street and investors that the board and/or management team still view their company’s stock as a bargain.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, companies with steady or growing net income that undertake buybacks on a regular basis can increase their earnings per share (EPS) and make their stock more fundamentally attractive to value-focused investors. Earnings growth associated with share repurchases has played a key role in the current bull market rally.

Image source: Getty Images.

Wall Street’s greater-than $10 trillion investment may not be enough to prevent a stock market crash

While all signs continue to point to businesses — especially S&P 500 companies — putting a lot of their capital to work via buybacks over the next decade, share repurchases alone are unlikely to mask a historically pricey stock market.

Although “value” is an entirely subjective term that can change from one investor to the next, most investors tend to put a lot of faith in the traditional price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. The P/E ratio is arrived at by dividing a company’s share price by its trailing-12-month EPS. While this valuation tool allows for quick assessments of mature businesses, it’s not particularly useful for growth stocks or when shock events and recessions occur.

What’s been a far more accurate valuation measure for Wall Street is the S&P 500’s Shiller P/E Ratio, which is also known as the cyclically adjusted P/E Ratio, or CAPE Ratio. This valuation measure, which has been back-tested to January 1871, relies on average inflation-adjusted EPS from the prior 10 years. This ensures that short-lived shock events can’t skew the reading.

As of the closing bell on March 7, the S&P 500’s Shiller P/E Ratio stood at 36.34, which is more than double its 154-year average of 17.21. Further, it’s the third-highest reading during a continuous bull market.

S&P 500 Shiller CAPE Ratio data by YCharts.

Including the present, there have only been six occurrences since 1871 where the Shiller P/E has topped 30, and the previous five instances all saw the S&P 500 shed at least 20% of its value. Though the Shiller P/E isn’t a timing tool, it does have a flawless track record of foreshadowing big-time downside in equities.

Share repurchases can only extend valuation premiums on Wall Street so far. For instance, Apple (AAPL -2.92%) has accounted for $695.3 billion out of the S&P 500’s $7.11 trillion in cumulative buybacks over the trailing decade (through Sept. 30, 2024), based on data from S&P Global.

Despite spending more on share repurchases than any other public company, Apple’s EPS has been flat over the last couple of years. Over that time, its net income has fallen from $99.8 billion in fiscal 2022 (Apple’s fiscal year ends in late September), to $97 billion in fiscal 2023, and finally $93.7 billion in fiscal 2024. Apple is the ideal example of the promise and limitations associated with aggressive share buybacks.

Not even Wall Street’s greater-than $10 trillion investment over the next decade can save it from an eventual move lower.