A recent analysis by a crypto market expert has reignited interest in XRP’s potential utility, especially in the context of Ripple capturing a portion of SWIFT’s global transaction volume. According to the expert, if Ripple secures just 14% of SWIFT’s market share, the implications for XRP’s supply and potential could be significant.

XRP’s Potential If Ripple Takes On 14% Of SWIFT

Market expert Crypto Eri has emphasized, through detailed mathematical calculations, the impact Ripple, capturing 14% of SWIFT’s total annual cross-border volume, could have on XRP’s supply and daily transactions. Notably, the market expert emphasized that if Ripple were to process such a percentage, which is roughly $4.2 trillion, it would require a surprisingly small portion of XRP’s total supply to support the transaction. 

Related Reading

According to Crypto Eri’s calculations, the $4.2 trillion annual volume translates to approximately $11.5 billion in daily transaction value. To assess how much the altcoin would be needed to facilitate this, the analyst assumed a deliberately conservative scenario, with each token being used once every three minutes. This is significantly slower than XRP’s actual settlement capability of 3 to 5 seconds but was chosen to reflect the potential liquidity management constraints in real-world applications. 

With 86,400 seconds in a day and each transaction occupying about 80 seconds, each XRP could be used for up to 480 transactions daily. Moreover, at the current market price of $2.15, Crypto Eri calculated that one XRP could facilitate $1,032 worth of transactions per day. To process the estimated $11.5 billion in daily volume, this would need approximately 11.15 million XRP tokens.

This figure is striking when compared to XRP’s circulating supply, which currently stands at around 58.82 billion tokens. Crypto Eri stated that just 0.0190% of this supply would be necessary to handle the calculated transaction volume, reinforcing the idea that XRP’s high velocity and reusability make it a possible efficient bridge asset. 

Overall, Crypto Eri’s Ripple-SWIFT analysis model presents a compelling case for XRP’s utility in the global payments space. Her calculations and projections have also sparked widespread engagement across the crypto community, with several independent researchers and members concurring with her assessment and contributing their data-driven models to validate the projections further. 

The Token Burn Rate Estimates For Trillion-Dollar Use Case

As XRP’s potential utility in global finance is brought into focus by Crypto Eri, the market expert also offers new insight into XRP’s burn rate in terms of fees needed to facilitate a $5 trillion annual transaction volume. A crypto community member followed up on the analyst’s earlier Ripple and SWIFT calculations by asking how many of the token would be conservatively burned through transaction fees.

Related Reading

The analyst estimated that only 5,000 XRP would be permanently burned in the process—an astonishingly small figure considering the massive scale of value being transferred. The estimate assumes an average transaction size of $10,000, which would result in roughly 500 million transactions per year to reach the $5 trillion mark.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

An official committee of the Bank of England tasked with monitoring the economy of the UK says it will continue to monitor developments in stablecoins and the financial risks associated with these assets.

In a report of its April 4th and April 8th meetings, the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) identifies the risks posed by stablecoins as the market for these stable asset-pegged cryptocurrencies grew in size and activity over the past year.

“Greater issuance of sterling offshore stablecoins with inappropriate backing assets, or backing assets on which the risk is poorly managed, could be vulnerable to greater risk of fire-sales of backing assets, with implications for core financial markets in the UK.”

The body warns against the dominance of stablecoins backed by foreign currencies, even as the UK and other jurisdictions work on developing regulatory regimes for these assets.

“Even with appropriate regulation, greater use of stablecoins denominated in foreign currencies could make some economies vulnerable to currency substitution and other macro financial implications.”

The FPC says there are also potential implications for cross-border payments once stablecoin use goes beyond crypto settlements.

“For retail flows, stablecoins could see greater household and SMEs use for cross-border payments, which may result in currency substitution. For wholesale flows, settlement outside of central bank money could increase counterparty credit risk and make it harder to moderate increased volatility in cross-border flows through central bank liquidity facilities.”

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram

Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

&nbsp

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Generated Image: Midjourney

What just happened? China has created a deep-sea cable-cutting device capable of severing the world’s most fortified underwater communication and power lines at depths of up to 4,000 meters. This technology, developed by the China Ship Scientific Research Centre and its State Key Laboratory of Deep-sea Manned Vehicles, targets armored steel, rubber, and polymer cables, which underpin 95 percent of global data transmission.

China has created a deep-sea cable-cutting device capable of severing the world’s most fortified underwater communication and power lines at depths of up to 4,000 meters. This technology, developed by the China Ship Scientific Research Centre and its State Key Laboratory of Deep-sea Manned Vehicles, targets armored steel, rubber, and polymer cables, which underpin 95 percent of global data transmission. The device integrates seamlessly with China’s advanced crewed and uncrewed submersibles, such as the Fendouzhe and Haidou series, marking a significant leap in underwater capabilities.

Initially intended for civilian applications like seabed mining and salvage operations, the tool’s dual-use potential has raised concerns globally. Its ability to disrupt communication cables near strategic locations like Guam could have profound geopolitical implications, potentially triggering a widespread crisis.

The situation is particularly relevant given the US military’s reliance on such infrastructure for its defense strategies. Recent incidents involving seabed communication lines, such as the suspected sabotage of undersea cables in the Baltic Sea, have heightened global awareness of these networks’ vulnerability.

The development of this cutting tool has effectively overcome several technical challenges inherent to deep-sea environments. The team, led by engineer Hu Haolong, designed a titanium alloy shell with oil-compensated seals to withstand immense pressure and prevent implosion even during prolonged use. The device features a diamond-coated grinding wheel that spins at 1,600 rpm, capable of shattering steel-reinforced cables while minimizing disturbance to marine sediment. Its relatively low-power motor balances efficiency with the limited resources available on submersibles.

This technological advancement underscores China’s expanding presence in undersea infrastructure. Beijing now operates the world’s largest fleet of crewed and uncrewed submersibles, enabling access to the world’s oceans. The potential for stealthy operation from remote platforms has sparked discussions within military research communities, which are acutely aware of the strategic implications of such technology.

Despite geopolitical tensions, Chinese scientists emphasized that the device’s intended purpose is to support marine resource development. As nations increasingly focus on exploiting ocean resources, this technology will enhance China’s capabilities in the blue economy and solidify its position as a maritime powerhouse. This goal aligns with China’s broader objectives, including constructing a deep-sea ‘space station’ in the South China Sea, designed to accommodate extended stays for research and development purposes.

Furthermore, China’s collaborations with other nations, such as the Cook Islands, reflect its growing influence in the marine economy. Both countries have committed to deepening cooperation in oceanic endeavors, focusing on sustainable development and economic growth through marine resources.

When the CyberKongz Wells Notice dropped, the Web3 gaming community went into a frenzy. Issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), this notice has huge implications for NFTs. As NFTs continue to change the digital gaming landscape, understanding how they’re classified and what compliance looks like is more important than ever.

The SEC Wells Notice: What it means for CyberKongz

In April 2021, CyberKongz sold Genesis Kongz NFTs. The SEC treated these NFTs as securities and issued a Wells notice – an official letter saying enforcement action is possible. CyberKongz has argued it was a contract migration not a primary sale, but the SEC’s stance shows the growing scrutiny of NFT securities in the broader Web3 space.

This isn’t just about one project. It’s a test case. If the SEC treats these NFTs as securities, it will change the tokenomics, fundraising and community governance models of many blockchain gaming projects.

CyberKongz has 30 days to respond and its defense will shape the broader conversation around digital gaming assets. Time is running out.

Industry Response

The CyberKongz Wells Notice has sparked a lot of discussions. Industry leaders like Axie Infinity are coming out in support of CyberKongz saying increased enforcement will at least force the U.S. government to define the rules for Web3 gaming projects.

Once regulatory clarity comes, blockchain game developers will be able to build sustainable business models. Compliance will now be a primary focus, guiding token distribution, in-game economies, and user incentives. In summary, the industry’s response today will establish the foundation for years to come.

Global Regulatory Comparison

While the SEC’s stance is getting all the attention, it’s worth noting the U.S. is not the only one figuring out how to regulate NFTs. The global regulatory landscape for NFTs is varied and each region’s approach will impact how projects like CyberKongz will comply.

Europe: Under the upcoming MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) framework, NFTs may get clearer definitions and guidelines. This could be a more stable environment for blockchain gaming companies to operate. Some European regulators are saying NFTs are outside the scope of traditional securities laws while others are pushing for more oversight especially if NFTs are used as investment vehicles.

Asia: Several Asian countries – Singapore and Hong Kong – are launching pro-innovation frameworks to encourage responsible experimentation. But enforcement agencies are still watching NFT and Web3 gaming closely to protect investors and prevent illicit activities. Finding the balance between growth and consumer safety is the main challenge.

Latin America and Africa: Emerging markets take a more relaxed approach, seeing NFTs as tools for financial inclusion and economic development. Regulatory bodies may not intervene as quickly but they’re not ignoring the risks. As these regions become crypto hubs, local regulators may look to the U.S. and Europe for guidance on how to craft their own rules.

This global NFT regulatory landscape is a nightmare for projects like CyberKongz. Companies that want to operate in multiple jurisdictions must navigate a web of different requirements. Strategic compliance planning will be key to future success.

Blockchain Compliance and Regulation

If gaming tokens are classified as securities, it will significantly impact the industry. Compliance requirements—including disclosures and investor protection—will alter how blockchain games distribute and manage their tokens. Many startups in the space have grown by experimenting with tokenomics, community governance and open-source ecosystems. Under more regulation these core elements will need to be rethought.

As more gaming companies get scrutinized, adapting to securities laws will be a survival requirement. Blockchain compliance in gaming is not just about avoiding legal trouble, it’s about building trust. Clear compliance standards will help projects avoid getting caught in the crosshairs of regulators and create a healthier more sustainable industry.

Navigating the New Landscape

Going forward, advanced compliance solutions will be a must. Implementing robust AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and KYC (Know Your Customer) protocols, for example, will help prevent illegal activities and create a safer and more trustworthy environment for players and investors. Technology solutions can help with compliance so projects can focus on innovation without compromising on the rules.

As the rules change we’ll see more collaboration between gaming companies, regulators and consumer protection agencies. The goal is to find the balance where innovation can thrive without compromising investor and player protections. The long term result will be a more transparent, accountable and sustainable blockchain gaming industry – one that will emerge stronger and more resilient after the CyberKongz Wells Notice and similar challenges.

Conclusion

The CyberKongz Wells Notice has brought compliance, transparency and regulatory awareness to the forefront. The outcome of this case combined with the different international approaches to NFT regulation will have long term impact to the Web3 gaming landscape. By being proactive with compliance and keeping an eye on global regulatory trends blockchain gaming projects can stay on the right side of the law – while delivering the most innovative experiences to players worldwide.

Editor’s note: This article was written with the assistance of AI. Edited and fact-checked by Owen Skelton.