Grants – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com Latest Crypto News Fri, 05 Sep 2025 17:10:15 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.7 https://i0.wp.com/earlybirdsinvest.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cropped-New-Project-2024-12-17T235703.455.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Grants – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com 32 32 240146708 Announcing May 2018 Cohort of EF Grants https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-may-2018-cohort-of-ef-grants/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-may-2018-cohort-of-ef-grants/#respond Fri, 05 Sep 2025 17:10:15 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-may-2018-cohort-of-ef-grants/

Thank you all for applying, and we’re excited to announce the latest Ethereum Foundation grants! We funded 22 recipients for a total of $2.84M.

Apply here for the next round! 🦄

Background

The Ethereum project seeks to support useful dapps and smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain, and the goal of the Ethereum Foundation is to empower developers with best-in-class R&D, developer experience, and education. Despite the early promise of the ecosystem, we still have a long way to go, and we are here to work with the community to drive concrete progress.

These grants will fuel the teams working hard at research & development to support the entire ecosystem and help make Ethereum more scalable, useful and secure. These projects have no ICOs, no token sales, and focus simply on building useful products and experiences.

Scalability can be in the form of implementing sharding, plasma or state channels with existing teams or on your own. It can also be in the form of optimizing geth/parity or building alternate clients. Usability is for improving the developer experience (e.g. static analyzers, linters, dev frameworks, mobile SDKs) or the user experience. Security can range from auditing existing contracts to providing tools that prevent error-prone programming patterns to contributing to alternative second-layer languages that focus on security. We are also beginning to engage with the product/design community to help solve product and UX design problems, including areas like key management, Ethereum payments UX and onboarding flows.

Lastly, we would like to remind ourselves of how the Ethereum project began: passionate open-source developers contributing to the project on their spare time. In that spirit, we’ve begun a “hackternship” grant for community members that propose an impactful Ethereum side project.

What we provide for grantees

  1. Non-dilutive funding
  2. Technical advisory
  3. Connection to more users
  4. Platform to share your work

We hope to provide Ethereum teams with more runway, advice and resources to focus simply on building useful products and experiences.

Also, many of these grants may be followed on with additional funding and/or collaboration when milestones are achieved. We believe this will provide tight feedback loops for impact to the ecosystem.

Grantee List: May 2018

Scalability:

Perun – $250K. State channels R&D.

PISA (by Patrick McCorry et al.) – $250K. State channels R&D.

Sprites Implementation (by Enuma) – $200K. Payment channels implementation.

General Computation on Plasma (by Parsec Labs) – $50K. Plasma implementation.

Plasma (by Kyokan) – $50K. Plasma implementation.

Plasma (by Fourth State) – $32K. Plasma implementation.


Usability:

DevEx grants*:

WalletConnect (by Balance.io) – $150K.  Interoperability for web dapps and mobile wallets.

iOS Dev Kit (by Ackee) – $50K. iOS + Ethereum starter project (MVVM support).

EtherKit (by vault.io) – $50K. iOS development framework (Swift).

vipnode – $35K. Light client incentivization.

BrowsEth – $25K. Typescript library for browsers.


#buidl grants**:

ENS Foundation$1M. To date, the Ethereum Foundation has supported ENS via hiring developers internally, but now ENS is mature enough to become its own independent organization. We’re excited to continue working with this great project/team going forward.

Pop Wallet –  $100K. Open-source browser wallet.

Trust Wallet – $30K. Open-source mobile wallet.


Security:

Zeppelin – $430K. Solidity compiler audit (co-sponsored with Augur)

Cedille – $50K. Smart contract formal verification R&D.

SecureEth – $30K. Smart contract development standards.

Gitcoin – $25K. Bug bounty platform.


Hackternship:

Flint Programming Language – $10K. Safety-focused smart contract language.

Richard Littauer – $10K. Developer onboarding documentation.

Chris Spannos – $10K. Developer onboarding documentation.

Chinese Academy of Sciences (Yi Sun et al.) – $5K. Sharding R&D.


* DevEx Grant – Improves developer experience (“useful” for developers).

** #buidl Grant – Builds for the end user (“useful” for users).

 

Wishlist for future grants

In future rounds of grants, we would like to see more applications in these areas:

  1. Scalability

    1. More payment and/or state channels implementations 💚💙
    2. More plasma implementations 💚💙
    3. More sharding implementations 💚
    4. Improving efficiency of existing clients such as geth & parity 💚💙
    5. A tokenless “Lightning Network” for Ethereum 💙
    6. Tokenless Casper staking pool contracts 🔥
    7. WebAssembly R&D 🔥

  2. Usability

    1. Improve private key management and transacting in Ethereum 💚💙
    2. Alternative wallet / client designs 💙
    3. Standards and portability between wallets 💙🔥
    4. Tooling that improves developer experience 💚💙
    5. Improved documentation & developer/user education videos 💚💙
    6. Tokenless end user products 🔥
    7. Vyper development 🔥
    8. More security focused high-level languages 🔥

  3. Security

    1. Security audits for Solidity and Vyper 💙
    2. Smart contract audits 💚
    3. Specifically, audits for ERC20, ERC223, ERC721, multisig wallets, vaults 🔥
    4. Tooling that prevents vulnerable code 💚💙

  4. Hackternships

    1. You already have a job (or school)? No problem! Suggest a problem you want to solve and we’re happy to fund a 10-week $10K externship for your spare-time working on Ethereum. 💚💙(Successful projects will be featured at a developer conference. We are also looking to hire and fund from this pool of side projects. If you’re looking for where to start, look at the list above.)

💚– Funded in March 2018 cohort
💙– Funded in May 2018 cohort
🔥– New to wishlist

 

Next steps

This is an ongoing grant program, and we’d like to invite the rest of the community to approach us with your ideas (application link).

Ethereum is built by the community for the community, and we’re here to support you. Thank you for building!

Best,
Ethereum Foundation Team
5.2.18

(Mostly paraphrased from first post)

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-may-2018-cohort-of-ef-grants/feed/ 0 56922
Ethereum Foundation Grants Update – Wave III https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iii/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iii/#respond Wed, 03 Sep 2025 12:51:10 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iii/

We’ve been hard at work getting to know so many amazing people and projects, and are extremely excited to announce the recipients of the Wave III of the Ethereum Foundation Grants Program!

We kicked off 2018 with a blog post to galvanize scalability research for first and second-layer solutions. Since then, we’ve committed over $11M to 52 projects dedicated to advancing the Ethereum ecosystem. Grants have funded multiple plasma and state channel implementations, diverse client research, enhanced developer frameworks, security audits, and so much more (find them all in the previous posts: Wave I & Wave II)!

A Look into the Selection Process

Since the Grants Program has picked up, we’ve received feedback requesting greater transparency into our processes and a deeper look into the various types of projects considered. Here’s a funding snapshot and grant process update:

Funding Snapshot

The EF Grant Program provided more than $11M in support to 52 projects since early 2018 (Waves I, II, and III).

Grants Charts

Our funding allocation remains true to the program’s original purpose, awarding nearly 7Mtoscalabilityprojects.Afterthis,securityhasbeengrantedalmost7M to scalability projects. After this, security has been granted almost 2M, #buidl projects (projects that improve user experience) received 1.6M,andDevExprojects(projectsthatimprovedeveloperexperience)received1.6M, and DevEx projects (projects that improve developer experience) received 744K. While dollar allocation remains heavily focused on scalability, the number of projects funded are more evenly distributed between categories.

Grants Process Update

The EF Grants program is constantly evolving. With this round, we’ve refined our internal processes to ensure timely fund disbursement. We understand how quickly the space moves and believe in the importance of expedient fund dispersal to the front line. Eventually, we aim to award grants on a rolling basis in order to provide more immediate support to the projects and teams leading the charge for decentralization and transparency.

Ideal applicants come with strong technical knowledge, project roadmap, and show a commitment to fostering collaboration within the ecosystem. For more information about applicant expectations and process workflow, please see our Applicant Expectations and FAQs.

Wave III

With each round, the grants program evolves. Our goal is to effectively grease the wheels for projects building the critical infrastructure of our young community. There are many tracks to lay down before Ethereum “makes it” and it’s been incredible to see all the projects working to lay down these tracks.

The applicant pool for Wave III offered a record number of strong teams and innovative ideas. It’s fascinating and humbling to see the diversity of projects from around the world with a shared interest in fostering the development of Ethereum. These are folks spending their free time reading ethresear.ch, developing new libraries and wallet designs, and engaging in communities discussing the latest in DApp usability and security…and we love them for that.

Without further ado…

🎉 We are proud to announce our Wave III Finalists! 🎉

Scalability

  • StarkWare — $4M with 6K ETH Performance-based Bounties. Development of standards report and production-quality software for optimized STARK-friendly hash functions and tooling
  • Force Move Game Framework — $300K. Force move games state channel framework
  • Harmony — $90K. Minimal sharding and random beacon chain

Security


Usability

Developer experience (DevEx grant)


Building for the end user (#buidl grant)

  • DappNode — $250K. Mass full node adoption
  • Uniswap — $100k. DEX framework
  • Nethermind — $50K. .NET client implementation
  • thaEth — $20K. Gnosis Safe UI Design

Education


Hackternhips


Scalability will continue to be a focus of EF grants, but we also look to fund other critical work. This includes better UX, new clients, high-level languages, better developer tools, and efforts to make Ethereum applications more secure. With Wave III, we expanded into education and community efforts in order to help bring new talent into the ecosystem.

Want to #BUIDL with us?  See the dev wishlist below and follow links to learn more. If you can imagine a project relating to the topics listed, submit an application and talk to us!

Wishlist for the next grant round

Scalability

  1. More payment and/or state channel implementations 💚💙💜
  2. More plasma implementations 💚💙
  3. More shasper implementations 🔥
  4. Improving efficiency of existing clients such as geth & parity 💚💙
  5. A tokenless “Lightning Network” for Ethereum 💙
  6. WebAssembly R&D 🔥

Privacy

  1. STARKS R&D 🔥
  2. BLS12-381 implementations in new languages 🔥
  3. libp2p Python implementation 🔥

Usability

  1. Improve private key management and transacting in Ethereum 💚💙
  2. Alternative wallet / client designs 💙💜
  3. Standards and portability between wallets 💙
  4. Tooling that improves developer experience 💚💙💜
  5. Improved documentation & developer/user education videos 💚💙💜
  6. Tokenless end user products 💜
  7. Vyper development 💜
  8. More security focused high-level languages 💜
  9. Non-transferable ID tokens 🔥

Security

  1. Security audits for Vyper 💙💜
  2. Smart contract audits 💚💜
  3. Particularly, audits for ERC20, ERC223, ERC721, multisig wallets, vaults 💜
  4. Tooling that prevents vulnerable code 💚💙💜
  5. IDE with a visual debugger 🔥
  6. Privacy Solutions

Hackternships

You already have a job (or school)? No problem! Suggest a problem you want to solve and we’re happy to fund a 10-week $10K externship for your spare-time working on Ethereum. 💚💙💜(Successful projects will be featured at a developer conference. We are also looking to hire and fund from this pool of side projects. If you’re looking for where to start, look at the list above.)

💚 —  Wave I / 💙 — Wave II / 💜 — Wave III / 🔥 — New to wishlist


For more inspiration…

  • Read the original DevGrant post.
  • Read the post that kicked off the current program.
  • Find the grantees from Wave I and Wave II.
  • Keep up to date with research here and here.

Bonus: Grant Ops Contest!

With the growing number of applicants, we’ll be needing to create an official website for the Grants Program. Do you have any ideas on how to make the website fun, transparent, and useful to future grant applicants? (mmhmm) Great! Because we will be running a contest and crowdsourcing ideas from all of you. Selected ideas will receive some unicorn love and some ETH. Stay tuned for details on how to participate!

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iii/feed/ 0 56554
Ethereum Foundation Grants Update – Wave IV https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iv/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iv/#respond Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:25:12 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iv/

Greetings from the Ethereum Foundation Grants Team!

As we go full steam ahead to Devcon 4, we’re back to announce Wave 4 of the Grants Program! Thank you to all the fantastic community members that have applied with creative ideas on how to bolster our ecosystem. We would not exist without the time and energy that you put into Ethereum. While the program continues to grow, we will increasingly continue to involve more community members in the decision making process. The Grants Program today is vastly improved from just earlier this year, thanks to all the helpful feedback from the community, allowing us to provide better public tools and infrastructure.

If you haven’t heard of us before, our last announcement went into some depth on program history, funding summary, and processes. Find that post here, and you can see guidelines and more here.

Without further ado…

🎉 We are proud to announce our Wave 4 Grantees! 🎉

Scalability

  • Non-Custodial Payment Channel Hub​​ — $420K. Payment upon delivery for the open source SDK release built by Spankchain, Kyokan, and Connext at Devcon 4
  • Prototypal​​ — $375K. Front-end state channel research and development.
  • Finality Labs​​ ​​– $250K. Development of Forward-Time Locked Contracts (FTLC).
  • Kyokan​​ ​​– $125K. Development of production ready mainnet Plasma Cash & Debit plugins.
  • Atomic Cross-Chain Transactions — $65K. Research led by Maurice Herlihy of Brown University.
  • EthSnarks​​ ​​– $40K. Development of a cross-compatible SDK for zkSNARKS to be viable on Ethereum.

Security

  • Flintstones — $120K. Further development of the Flint Language including a security focused IDE by Susan Eisenbach of Imperial College London.

Usability (DevEx)

  • TrueBlocks ​​– $120K. Open source block explorer.
  • Gitcoin​​ — $100K. Funding bounties on Gitcoin.
  • VulcanizeDB ​​– $75K. “Community sourced” block explorer.
  • Buidler ​​– $50K. Development of modular alternative to Truffle based on Ethers.js.
  • Ethdoc​​ — $25K. Open source tool for organization and interaction of smart contract codebases.
  • Ethers.js​​ — $25K. Support for ricmoo to continue development and maintenance of Ethers.js.
  • Kauri​​ — $25K. Funding documentation bounties on Kauri.

(#BUIDL)

  • Magic Money Tree (Dark Crystal) — $50K. Tool for securely storing and recovering keys and secrets through a multisig design by the Secure Scuttlebutt Team.

Hackternships


Client Diversity


Want to #BUIDL with us?  See the dev wishlist below and follow links to learn more. If you can imagine a project relating to the topics listed, submit an application and talk to us!

Wishlist!

Scalability

  1. More payment and/or state channel implementations 💚💙💜
  2. More plasma implementations 💚💙
  3. Improving efficiency of existing clients such as geth & parity 💚💙
  4. A tokenless “Lightning Network” for Ethereum 💙
  5. WebAssembly R&D 🔥
  6. libp2p Python implementation 🔥
  7. Plasma Cash implementations for fungible tokens utilizing defragmentation techniques found here and here 🔥
  8. Academic analysis of Casper 🔥

Privacy

  1. STARKS R&D 🔥
  2. BLS12-381 implementations in new languages 🔥

Usability

  1. Improve private key management and transacting in Ethereum 💚💙💛
  2. Alternative wallet / client designs 💙💜
  3. Standards and portability between wallets 💙
  4. Tooling that improves developer experience 💚💙💜💛
  5. Improved documentation & developer/user education videos 💚💙💜💛
  6. Tokenless end user products 💜
  7. Vyper development 💜
  8. More security focused high-level languages 💜
  9. Non-transferable ID tokens 🔥
  10. Establishing a spec and cross client test suite for the JSON-RPC API 🔥
  11. Analysis of and analytics for real world Ethereum transactions (application usage, gas / opcode usage, missed avenues for optimization, etc) 🔥
  12. Tooling that source-verifies contracts client-side, makes use of the metadata hash and shows NatSpec comments to the user for use in wallets 🔥

Security

  1. Security audits for Vyper 💙💜
  2. Smart contract audits 💚💜
  3. Particularly, audits for ERC20, ERC223, ERC721, multisig wallets, vaults 💜
  4. Tooling that prevents vulnerable code 💚💙💜
  5. IDE with a visual debugger 🔥
  6. Privacy Solutions 🔥
  7. More in-depth network monitoring tools 🔥

Education

  1. Community groups and conferences for underrepresented and underserved communities 🔥
  2. Translation of research, documentation, and specs into other languages 🔥

Hackternships

You already have a job (or school)? No problem! Suggest a problem you want to solve and we’re happy to fund a 10-week $10K externship for your spare-time working on Ethereum. 💚💙💜💛(Successful projects will be featured at a developer conference. We are also looking to hire and fund from this pool of side projects. If you’re looking for where to start, look at the list above.)

💚 —  Wave I / 💙 — Wave II / 💜 — Wave III /  💛– Wave IV / 🔥 — New to wishlist


For more inspiration…


Keep up to date with research here and here.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethereum-foundation-grants-update-wave-iv/feed/ 0 56438
Solana Policy Institute grants $500K to defend Tornado Cash developers https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solana-policy-institute-grants-500k-to-defend-tornado-cash-developers/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solana-policy-institute-grants-500k-to-defend-tornado-cash-developers/#respond Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:02:53 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solana-policy-institute-grants-500k-to-defend-tornado-cash-developers/

The Solana Policy Institute (SPI) has pledged $500,000 to the legal defense of Tornado Cash developers Roman Storm and Alexey Pertsev, according to an Aug. 28 statement.

Storm and Pertsev helped create Tornado Cash, an Ethereum-based privacy protocol that allows crypto transactions to be mixed and anonymized. After deployment, the developers relinquished control of the smart contracts, leaving the system to run without centralized oversight.

Developers held liable

Courts in the Netherlands and the US have held the developers liable for malicious actors’ use of the platform for their illicit activities.

Pertsev was convicted of money laundering in 2024, while Storm was found guilty earlier this month of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

These convictions have elicited strong responses from the crypto community, which argues that the Tornado Cash developers’ conviction misinterprets how blockchain protocols function.

Industry experts argue that developers cannot monitor or restrict usage of their protocols once the open-source code is published and immutable.

Notably, the SPI echoed this view, warning that holding coders responsible for third-party activity establishes a precedent that threatens innovation across the entire software industry.

Kristin Smith, the President of the Solana Policy Institute, said:

“Privacy is normal. Code is speech. And at Solana Institute, we’ll continue to defend the rights of software developers everywhere.”

Solana welcomes ‘Tornado Cash-like’ protocol

The SPI donation comes as Solana welcomes the launch of a Tornado Cash–style platform on its network.

On Aug. 27, Privacy Cash went live on the network, offering users a way to transfer digital assets into new wallets without linking prior addresses or transaction histories.

Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs, said the tool’s design mirrors Tornado Cash’s but benefits from Solana’s performance and integrated block explorers.

According to him, combining the protocol with Solana’s infrastructure—and even bridging to privacy-focused assets like Zcash—gives users a pathway to near-total anonymity.

Mentioned in this article
]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/solana-policy-institute-grants-500k-to-defend-tornado-cash-developers/feed/ 0 55690
Ethzilla grants $250 million to buy back and expands Ether Treasury to $489 million https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethzilla-grants-250-million-to-buy-back-and-expands-ether-treasury-to-489-million/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethzilla-grants-250-million-to-buy-back-and-expands-ether-treasury-to-489-million/#respond Mon, 25 Aug 2025 23:36:50 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethzilla-grants-250-million-to-buy-back-and-expands-ether-treasury-to-489-million/

Etzilla (ethz) The company has approved a $250 million share repurchase program as the company doubles its ether-centric financial strategy, the company said in a press release Monday.

The Florida-based company said the board would soon approve the buyback and would run until June 30, 2026, or until the $250 million allocation runs out.

In addition to the move, the NASDAQ registered company has now held 102,237 ETH, which it acquired at an average price of 3,948.72.

At current market valuation, the stash is worth around $489 million. The company also reported that it holds approximately $215 million, equivalent to US dollar cash.

“As we continue to expand ETH bookings and pursue differentiated yield opportunities, we believe our current aggressive stock repurchase programme underscores our commitment to maximizing shareholder value.”

Ethzilla has also introduced its own electrical asset protocol. It says it will be used to generate higher yields on crypto stocks.

As of August 24, 2025, the company reported that 102,237 ETHs had been issued about $489 million, $215 million in cash equivalents and 165,478,655 shares.

Buyback adds another layer to Ethzilla’s strategy of leveraging new yield protocols to enhance returns while also actively building ether reserves.

Ethzilla’s shares fell nearly 30% on Friday after it revealed that shareholders filed a maximum of 74.8 million shares. The stock was trading 4.5% lower at about $3.15 at the time of publication.

read more: Etazirah shares plummet nearly 30% as dilution threatens to overshadow the $349 million ether treasury

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ethzilla-grants-250-million-to-buy-back-and-expands-ether-treasury-to-489-million/feed/ 0 55122
US Court Grants Stay In Coinbase Biometric Data Lawsuit — Details https://earlybirdsinvest.com/us-court-grants-stay-in-coinbase-biometric-data-lawsuit-details/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/us-court-grants-stay-in-coinbase-biometric-data-lawsuit-details/#respond Sat, 23 Aug 2025 18:37:53 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/us-court-grants-stay-in-coinbase-biometric-data-lawsuit-details/

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In the latest development, an Illinois judge has granted a motion to pause proceedings in a lawsuit against US-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. This decision would suspend further actions in the crypto company’s court case involving alleged violations of the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).

How Another Case Could Decide The Outcome Of Coinbase Lawsuit

According to an August 21 filing in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman approved a motion submitted by Coinbase to stay a lawsuit accusing the exchange of violating the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act. The motion asked the court to wait for a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on a similar case.

The Court of Appeals case involves Nuance Communications and Charles Schwab, with the intricacies around supplying voice identification technology forming the foundation of the legal battle. The decision from this particular lawsuit could set precedent for how BIPA affects financial service providers, including cryptocurrency exchanges.

The court document read:

[T]he Court finds that the stay would simplify the issues and streamline the trial […] reduce the burden of litigation on the Court and the parties […] [and] would not unduly prejudice or tactically disadvantage Plaintiffs.

The lawsuit, filed in May 2025 by a group of users, accused Coinbase of the “wholesale collection” of biometric data for its Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements without notifying the users, thereby violating the Illinois law. The plaintiffs also alleged that the crypto company inappropriately shared the faceprints with third-party verification providers. 

Under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, private firms or organizations can face damages of up to $5,000 for each instance of reckless or intentional violation of the law and $1,000 per negligent violation of the BIPA. The plaintiffs also sought relief to cover their legal costs.

Coinbase Under Pressure From Data Security Breach

Due to a separate incident, Coinbase has been under scrutiny over the security of customer data. The crypto company revealed in May that a group of customer support contractors in India accessed account data for users in exchange for bribes.

While the customer contractors were eventually dismissed, the individuals behind the data breach tried to extort $20 million in Bitcoin from Coinbase. Ultimately, this incident has put Coinbase under pressure and called into question its process of handling personal user data.

Coinbase
The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView

Featured image from iStock, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/us-court-grants-stay-in-coinbase-biometric-data-lawsuit-details/feed/ 0 54757
The Supreme Court hands down incomprehensible gobbledygook about federal grants https://earlybirdsinvest.com/the-supreme-court-hands-down-incomprehensible-gobbledygook-about-federal-grants/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/the-supreme-court-hands-down-incomprehensible-gobbledygook-about-federal-grants/#respond Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:36:00 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/the-supreme-court-hands-down-incomprehensible-gobbledygook-about-federal-grants/

Late Thursday afternoon, the Supreme Court handed down an incomprehensible order concerning the Trump administration’s decision to cancel numerous public health grants. The array of six opinions in National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Association is so labyrinthine that any judge who attempts to parse it risks being devoured by a minotaur.

As Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson writes in a partial dissent, the decision is “Calvinball jurisprudence,” which appears to be designed to ensure that “this Administration always wins.”

The case involves thousands of NIH grants that the Trump administration abruptly canceled which, according to Jackson, involve “research into suicide risk and prevention, HIV transmission, Alzheimer’s, and cardiovascular disease,” among other things. The grants were canceled in response to executive orders prohibiting grants relating to DEI, gender identity, or Covid-19.

A federal district court ruled that this policy was unlawful — “arbitrary and capricious” in the language of federal administrative law — in part because the executive orders gave NIH officials no precise guidance on which grants should be canceled. As Jackson summarized the district court’s reasoning, “‘DEI’—the central concept the executive orders aimed to extirpate—was nowhere defined,” leaving NIH officials “to arrive at whatever conclusion [they] wishe[d]” regarding which grants should be terminated.

According to Jackson, “the court found, as a factual matter, ‘an unmistakable pattern of discrimination against women’s health issues’ and ‘pervasive racial discrimination’—indeed, ‘palpable’ racial discrimination of a sort the judge had ‘never seen’ in 40 years on the bench.”

The question of whether this judge was correct to deem the Trump administration’s policy arbitrary and capricious, however, was not before the Supreme Court. Instead, the case hinged on a jurisdictional dispute.

Which court is supposed to hear this case?

As a general rule, lawsuits alleging that a federal policy is illegal are heard by federal district courts, while suits alleging that the federal government breached a contract are heard by the Court of Federal Claims.

In NIH, the plaintiffs alleged that the broader policy that led to their grants being canceled was illegal, so that suggests that this case should have been brought in a district court (which is where it was actually brought). But the case also bears some superficial similarity to a breach of contract suit, because it involved the government’s decision not to pay money that it had previously agreed to pay.

Four justices — the three Democrats plus Chief Justice John Roberts — concluded that these plaintiffs were right to bring their suit in the district court. Four other justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh — concluded that the case must be brought in the Court of Claims. That would mean that these plaintiffs would have to start over again in the claims court, and possibly that they would have to bring individual suits seeking to reinstate individual grants, rather than seeking a broad order attacking the entire grant cancellation policy.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, meanwhile, cast the deciding vote. She claims that this suit must be split between the two courts. In her view, the district court was the proper venue for the plaintiffs to argue that the overall policy is illegal, but the claims court is the proper venue for them to actually seek the money they would have received if the grants are not canceled.

If that sounds confusing, it gets worse. Barrett’s opinion states that federal law bars the claims court from hearing “claims pending in other courts when those claims arise from ‘substantially the same operative facts.’” So these plaintiffs likely must wait until after they have fully litigated the question of whether the Trump administration’s broad policy is illegal in district court, before they can actually try to get any money in the claims court.

That could take years, especially if the first question is heard by the justices again. Moreover, as Jackson warns in her opinion, by the time the first round of litigation is finished, the plaintiffs may be unable to seek relief in the claims court because the statute of limitations for doing so will have expired.

The bottom line is that, because there are five votes for the proposition that some parts of this case go to the district court, and also five votes for the proposition that other parts of it go to the claims court, Barrett’s opinion controls the case. By the time this mess gets sorted out, it is likely that most — if not all — of the research at issue in NIH will be lost, even if the plaintiffs do prevail.

As Jackson writes, without any money to fund their operations, the grant recipients will need to “euthanize animal subjects, terminate life-saving trials, and close community health clinics.”

There are actually even more complexities in this case, but rather than engage in the Sysiphean task of trying to list all of them, I will simply repeat Jackson’s summary of what appears to be going on here:

In a broader sense, however, today’s ruling is of a piece with this Court’s recent tendencies. “[R]ight when the Judiciary should be hunkering down to do all it can to preserve the law’s constraints,” the Court opts instead to make vindicating the rule of law and preventing manifestly injurious Government action as difficult as possible. This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.

Godspeed to the poor lawyers and judges who now have to untangle the mess this Court just created.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/the-supreme-court-hands-down-incomprehensible-gobbledygook-about-federal-grants/feed/ 0 54492
Announcing a Taiwan-specific Wave of Grants https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-a-taiwan-specific-wave-of-grants/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-a-taiwan-specific-wave-of-grants/#respond Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:26:52 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-a-taiwan-specific-wave-of-grants/

The Taipei Ethereum Meetup recently hosted Crosslink Taiwan 2019. It was a wonderful event and a perfect opportunity for the Ethereum Foundation’s Ecosystem Support Program (ESP) to provide a Taiwan-specific wave of grants! The recipients are as follows.

🍍 Group 1: Ethereum-based Technical Projects: USD$5,000 awarded to each project

  • Eauth (License: MIT): An OAuth-compatible service based on Ethereum credentials to authenticate users on a website.
  • Ethereum Wallet SDK (License: LGPL-3.0): An SDK enabling Dapps to connect with different wallets.
  • SOLL (License: Apache-2.0): A new compiler for generating Ewasm code from Solidity code.

pinapple


  • Ironman-Blockchain: New Web3.js and Solidity tutorials for 30 consecutive days!
  • Open teaching materials: Open sourcing the materials for an Ethereum DApp Development course at National Chengchi University (NCCU).

🍍 Free Devcon Ticket Award

This award was designed to recognize long-term contributions made by local community members. Juin Chiu and Kimi Wu have interpreted and translated numerous hard research ideas from English to Mandarin, helping greatly with reducing language barriers and accelerating the spread of Ethereum knowledge. We were delighted to host Juin and Kimi at Devcon in Osaka and to see both of them again in Taipei shortly thereafter.

What’s Next?

One of Ethereum’s superpowers is the independent flourishing that occurs throughout its vast and vibrant ecosystem. Countless local Ethereum communities around the world are a big part of why Ethereum feels simultaneously global and personal for so many people.

Accordingly, the EF is continuously experimenting with ways to support communities around the world. We’re excited to apply what we’ve learned with our recent Korea, Japan, and now Taiwan focused grants programs in order to expand this concept even further.

Thank you to all of the community contributors who help make blockchain knowledge more accessible, thereby facilitating innovation, Ethereum adoption, and sharing Ethereum’s spirit around the world!

group

Thanks to Ethereum Foundation Special Projects team for the regional logo!
(From the back row, left) Albert (EF), Chang-Wu Chen (Open teaching materials), Vitalik Buterin (EF), Hung-Ying Tai (SOLL), and Ping Chen (Eauth). (From the front row, left) Juin Chiu, Anderson Chen (Ethereum Wallet SDK), and Ailin Liou (Ironman-Blockchain).

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/announcing-a-taiwan-specific-wave-of-grants/feed/ 0 53988
ESP: Beyond Grants https://earlybirdsinvest.com/esp-beyond-grants/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/esp-beyond-grants/#respond Sat, 19 Jul 2025 22:14:37 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/esp-beyond-grants/

Since transitioning into the Ecosystem Support Program from EF Grants, we’ve talked about defining “support” more comprehensively, thinking beyond simple grant funding. But what does a more comprehensive definition of support actually mean?

In practice, it means something different for every project, and it starts with a conversation. ESP was conceived to make a wide range of EF’s resources more accessible to the community, which starts with making our process accessible to anyone who might need support. We take the time to think critically about every inquiry, understand the project and explore ways we might be able to help. Of course we can’t fund every project, but often we can do something, even if it’s recommending additional resources to investigate such as incubators or other funding sources.

The whole point of this shift in thinking is to make the process more flexible and responsive to individual needs – which is a good thing! At the same time, the outcomes of this personalized process can be difficult to quantify or put into lists the way we can with traditional grants; so we thought we’d show rather than tell. We rounded up a few examples of projects (and the awesome people behind them!) that have come through ESP’s inquiry process, received different kinds of support, and made a little bit go a very long way.

Archive Node

The idea for Archive Node was born as a tweet. The hardware to run an archive node, or the monthly fees to access archive data through an API, can be prohibitively expensive for small projects with little or no funding. Hunter and Chase, aka DeFi Dude and MysticRyuujin respectively, are long-time Ethereum contributors with a keen understanding of the challenges that developers can face in getting affordable access to needed resources; so they set out to find a way to provide access to archive node data for developers who need it.

The team needed a place to host the first node, so we provided AWS credit to get a node up and running. This will give them a good runway; but as DeFi Dude wrote in the announcement blog post, once the project is more established, the hope is to eventually move toward the more sustainable and decentralized approach of running nodes off hardware rather than cloud services. Since unveiling the project in late June, the team has set up additional nodes (with help from community member Dan Matthews) of PieDAO, and started to accept applications for access, growing a community of developers who are able to access needed data without incurring the considerable cost of setting up their own node.

Although access is currently free, in the long term the team hopes this can be a community-funded project, with developers who need the service paying a small fraction of what it would cost them to run an archive node themselves. In the meantime we’re thrilled to be able to help provide this valuable resource as the community around it grows!

Learn more and apply for access at https://archivenode.io/, or follow Archive Node on Twitter @archivenode.

SaveDAI

SaveDAI started as a hackathon project, but the team had bigger plans for it: they’ve continued to build with the long term goal of making it easy to create self-insured versions of decentralized assets, allowing users to better protect savings kept in decentralized assets. SaveDAI passes DAI through Compound and automatically purchases insurance via Opyn Protocol to create insured, interest-bearing, dollar-pegged ERC20 tokens that can be transferred, bought, sold, and integrated into other protocols. The saveDAI team are building this architecture into a front-end platform, but the contract has been open sourced so that anyone can use, adapt, integrate or contribute to the code.

The team’s most immediate concern was making sure that their code was secure and stable in order to minimize risk to users’ funds. We were able to connect them with a technical expert for a code review, and they used the comprehensive feedback they received to refine their launch strategy and continue development with greater confidence. They’re preparing to launch a public alpha and are looking forward to getting feedback from early users!

If you’d like to learn more, you can dig into the documentation, follow along on Twitter @save_dai or get involved on Github.

Collegiate B.I.L.U.S

Joe Wesley is new to Ethereum and tech in general, a former NFL player turned motivational speaker – not necessarily what people think of as the typical ESP inquirer. But the truth is we love getting to know new people, and Joe is exactly the type of builder we want to hear from: creative, motivated, an avid learner and inspired by the potential of distributed technology. He came to us with a plan to build a platform on Ethereum that would address a problem that he’s directly experienced as a college and professional athlete from a low income background: college athletes get little benefit from the ways in which their brand, image and likeness are used by others for profit. Joe wanted to help athletes build relationships with advertisers where they would have more control over their brand, data and finances – enabling them to, in Joe’s words, “earn today and tomorrow off their brand and their fame.”

Joe’s biggest initial hurdle was simply getting to know Ethereum, its community and technology. We provided some initial feedback on his idea and he was back two weeks later with a draft of his whitepaper. We knew that dedication and enthusiasm, as well as his unique perspective, could only add value to the ecosystem; so we sent him to ETHDenver for a crash course in everything Ethereum. There, he lived Eth life to the fullest: networking, attending talks, learning the landscape, meeting Bufficorn and winning the Exploration Track sponsored by CryptoChicks.

Since ETHDenver Joe has kept in touch with contacts he made at ETHDenver as well as continued to consult with members of the EF and other experts as he works to build a prototype that he can share with potential customers and investors. So far Joe has been a one-man team, but is now looking to scale up by hiring a CTO who can help take Collegiate B.I.L.U.S. (Brand, Image and Likeness US) to testnet and beyond.

Get in touch or find out more about Collegiate B.I.L.U.S. on Instagram @collegiatebilus!

Ethereum Push Notification Service

EPNS was just an idea when we first met Harsh Rajat. He saw a need for push notification capabilities within Ethereum, both for public service announcements to Ethereum users and for dapp builders that wanted a new way to engage customers. We saw a driven, innovative builder who was deeply committed to Ethereum’s growth and success.

Harsh didn’t need much more than encouragement and feedback to help refine the concept and talk through next steps. He took his idea to HackMoney, where Richa Joshi joined the team. Together, they developed the core concept of EPNS into a many-layered and ever-evolving architecture in which critical information can be broadcast to Ethereum’s users; dapp builders can target users they know want to hear from them; and dapp users can both choose their level of engagement, and be rewarded for opting in to a higher level of engagement with their favorite dapps.

Since HackMoney, Richa and Harsh have directed incredible energy toward building EPNS into what they call “a missing piece of web3.” They’ve launched, offering early access and an alpha dapp; been accepted to Gitcoin’s KERNEL Fellowship; and are now growing their team and developing a business model that will allow them to build a self-sustaining platform without compromising their commitment to keep users’ interests at the forefront.

Check out https://epns.io/ and keep up with EPNS’s progress on Twitter @epnsproject.


We love the many builders we work with for their commitment to finding the best way forward even when it isn’t the simplest or most obvious. Although funding is often the easiest thing to ask for, it isn’t necessarily the ideal solution: a grant won’t get a project where it needs to go if we don’t dig deeper to find the real core of the challenges the project faces.

Just because a project isn’t funded through an ESP grant doesn’t mean we aren’t willing and able to provide meaningful and sometimes material support. That said, we can’t offer support to every team that approaches us, as much as we would like to! And just like grants, recipients of other types of support we offer only reap the benefits by taking responsibility for their own success and putting in a lot of hard work.

All of the teams featured in this post are building toward very different goals, but they have one thing in common: they came with the openness and insight to work with us on finding the best intersection of their needs and our capabilities.

We have been lucky to get to know all of these remarkable builders and are so proud of the hard work that they’ve put in. We can’t wait to see what they do next!

🦾

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/esp-beyond-grants/feed/ 0 48595
Shareholders push back against high pay for public Bitcoin miner execs after record equity grants https://earlybirdsinvest.com/shareholders-push-back-against-high-pay-for-public-bitcoin-miner-execs-after-record-equity-grants/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/shareholders-push-back-against-high-pay-for-public-bitcoin-miner-execs-after-record-equity-grants/#respond Fri, 11 Jul 2025 08:09:12 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/shareholders-push-back-against-high-pay-for-public-bitcoin-miner-execs-after-record-equity-grants/

Shareholders trimmed support for executive pay packages at leading US Bitcoin (BTC) miners to an average of 64% in this year’s proxy season, far below the over 90% approval norm across the S&P 500, according to a July 10 VanEck research note. 

VanEck reviewed filings from eight listed miners and found average named-executive-officer (NEO) compensation climbed from $6.6 million in 2023 to $14.4 million in draft 2024 proxies.

Equity and other long-term instruments accounted for 79% of total pay in 2023 and 89% in 2024, well above the Russell 3000’s 63% and the energy sector’s 63% weighting. 

Base salaries remained near industry norms at roughly $474,000, but equity grants increased significantly. 

Riot Platforms’ CEO secured a $79.3 million 2024 stock award, nearly double Marathon’s $40.1 million grant and multiple times the peer averages. Meanwhile, Core Scientific (CORZ), which was emerging from bankruptcy, issued its CEO $39.5 million in stock as part of remuneration.

Say-on-pay votes show mounting resistance

CORZ, Riot, and Marathon (MARA) failed their 2025 advisory votes on compensation, garnering approval rates of only 38%, 32%, and 22%, respectively. 

Industry-wide, six in eight companies missed the 70% support threshold that proxy adviser ISS flags as “low support,” a failure rate of 75% versus about 4% for the Russell 3000. 

Investors also scrutinised dilution. Equity plan expansions equal to roughly 10% of the shares outstanding were approved at Terawulf and CORZ, while smaller increases were approved at Bit Digital, Hut 8, and MARA. Analysts warned that generous share reserves amplify insider dilution when awards vest on short timelines. 

Gradual shift toward performance gating

Six of the eight miners now use performance stock units (PSUs) that vest on multi-year share price or total shareholder return targets, up from two in 2022. However, CleanSpark has yet to adopt PSUs, and Bit Digital has authorization but no issuance. 

VanEck noted that most plans still rely on two to three-year vesting horizons and “as-achieved” equity, leaving alignment gaps with long-term value creation. 

Comparing 2024 NEO pay with market cap gains shows stark dispersion: Riot’s $230 million aggregate NEO compensation equalled 73% of its market-cap increase, while Marathon’s 18% ratio and Core Scientific’s 2% ratio reflected better alignment. 

VanEck concluded that boards can temper push-back by tying bonuses to cost-per-coin-mined to enforce operating discipline, linking long-term equity to return-on-capital metrics instead of absolute share-price targets, and extending vesting schedules and capping awards to curb dilution. 

Mentioned in this article
]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/shareholders-push-back-against-high-pay-for-public-bitcoin-miner-execs-after-record-equity-grants/feed/ 0 46992