Christian Catalini, co-creator of Meta’s now-defunct Libra project, took to X to explain how Stripe’s Tempo blockchain fails one of the basic tenets of the crypto movement: decentralization.

In fact, Catalini believes that if Stripe’s Tempo succeeds commercially, it would mean that early crypto idealists will have to embrace a future where the original ethos of decentralization is lost. Catalini used the example of Libra’s failure to demonstrate his point.

The failure of Libra—what really killed it

Catalini noted that in the tech and finance industry, being too early to the market is almost the same as being wrong. In his post, Catalini wrote:

“Looking back on Libra, the stablecoin project I helped design inside Meta, I can confirm we weren’t just early; we were also comically, spectacularly wrong.”

Besides the unfortunate timing, several other factors contributed to Libra’s ultimate failure. This included the “Silicon Valley hubris—the belief that elegant code can simply wish away centuries of financial regulation,” Catalini wrote.

Additionally, Facebook’s aggressive marketing of Libra not only drew more attention, but also provided ammunition to its opponents.

According to Catalini, there is a prevalent misconception that Libra failed because it could not meet regulatory guidelines. However, the opposite is true, Catalini wrote, adding:

“The reality is that we were on the verge of becoming the most buttoned-up, regulator-friendly crypto project on the planet.”

Problems with corporate blockchains like Tempo

Catalini wrote:

“The problem with corporate chains like Tempo isn’t a matter of code—it’s a matter of incentives. We already know the script.”

This is how corporate blockchains usually work: a tech firm creates a blockchain and promises fairness. But after capturing a substantial chunk of the market, the temptation to tilt the playing field in their favor becomes nearly irresistible.

The Crypto Investor Blueprint: A 5-Day Course On Bagholding, Insider Front-Runs, and Missing Alpha

Nice Your first lesson is on the way.

Please add [email protected] to your email whitelist.

And “crypto’s purpose is to break this cycle of broken promises,” Catalini wrote, adding:

“It’s the same fundamental economic truth we identified at MIT almost a decade ago: the only thing that truly separates crypto from the systems it aims to replace is that it’s permissionless.”

Libra engineers decided to sacrifice the permissionless aspect of the network. Similarly, the network had to also scrap its plan of non-custodial wallets because regulators would not approve of it. Regulators needed to know who to call or fine when things go wrong, he explained.

“A world where users truly control their own money is messy, borderless, and doesn’t fit that legacy blueprint. For them, killing self-custody wasn’t a choice, it was an obvious necessity based on the tools they understood.”

How the success of Tempo is linked to the future of crypto

According to Catalini, if corporate blockchains like Tempo and Circle’s Arc succeed, it would indicate that “the crypto experiment was not a revolution, but a failed coup.” This is because while the backend technology will be different, the market structure will remain “eerily familiar,” he wrote.

In fact, Catalini described it as a change of kings while the throne remains the same—fintech giants will replace existing card networks and financial institutions. He further surmised that it is likely the markets in the West and the East will be controlled by at least two competing empires.

Catalini believes that if Libra’s demise could be wholly chalked up to bad timing, then Tempo’s success is nearly inevitable, given the change in regulatory stance. And in such a case, “the crypto world’s original dreamers may finally have to accept a more pragmatic, centralized reality.”

However, he warned:

“But if Libra’s ghost is a warning about a fundamental truth—that any system with a single architect is built on a fatal flaw—then Stripe is not writing a new story. It is merely staging an entertaining, and very expensive, sequel.”

Mentioned in this article

The following is a guest post and opinion from Michael Egorov, Founder of Curve Finance.

As DeFi edges closer to mainstream finance, it must balance neutrality, security, and throughput. In 2025, that balance is increasingly defined by two competing architectural visions.

The evolution of DeFi has always hinged on one core question: what kind of infrastructure do we want to build the future of finance on? As the space matures and edges toward integration with global financial systems, the urgency of this question only intensifies.

In 2025, this decision is no longer purely technical. It’s a contest between two visions: Ethereum’s modular, decentralization-first stack and Solana’s high-performance, monolithic approach. The outcome will help determine what the next phase of blockchain-based finance looks like—and shape the architecture of tomorrow’s global financial systems.

In this article, I share my perspective on how both networks are positioning themselves for the future, and which is more likely to emerge ahead in the long run.

Ethereum: The Foundation of Serious DeFi

Ethereum is more than just a blockchain—it’s the bedrock of modern DeFi. It’s where secure, composable applications can thrive and where long-term financial infrastructure is being built. Institutional players turn to Ethereum when they want to tokenize assets with confidence, and capital flows here for security. The fact that over 55% of total value locked (TVL) across major chains resides on Ethereum attests to its dominance.

Unlike Solana’s one-size-fits-all Layer 1, Ethereum has embraced a modular scaling approach. Layer 1 remains the core foundation, while Layer 2s handle specific workloads such as micro-transactions or gaming, avoiding congestion on the main chain. This structure preserves decentralization while enabling scale. With the rollout of Proto-Danksharding in early 2025, Layer 2 transaction costs have dropped significantly—cementing Ethereum’s lead in modular architecture.

That said, Ethereum’s model has trade-offs. Its reliance on Layer 2s can introduce fragmentation. Some DeFi primitives need to live on Layer 1 for full composability. While isolated applications like order book DEXs can function on L2s, these solutions often feel like a temporary fix, not a long-term design. Truly integrated DeFi demands synchronous, on-chain composability—which works best when everything operates at the same base layer.

But Ethereum’s greatest strength is its uncompromising commitment to decentralization. It is one of the most politically neutral blockchains in existence—a key trait in an increasingly regulated environment. Speed and user experience can be optimized over time, but decentralization is a founding principle. Once compromised, it’s nearly impossible to restore.

Developer experience is another edge. Writing smart contracts on Ethereum is significantly simpler than on Solana, enabling developers to produce secure, well-tested code. This maturity is part of the reason why Ethereum developers are comfortable making contracts immutable—there’s confidence in the security. It’s no coincidence that nearly every major DeFi innovation originated on Ethereum. With over 1,388 deployed protocols compared to Solana’s 232, the numbers speak for themselves.

When security, composability, and developer confidence align, the entire ecosystem benefits.

Solana: Fast and Efficient, But Centralized

Solana addresses the same scaling challenge from a different angle. Its monolithic architecture keeps everything on a single Layer 1. This offers tangible benefits: extremely fast transactions, low fees, and a seamless user experience.

From a raw performance standpoint, Solana is compelling—capable of processing 3,000–4,000 transactions per second (TPS) today, with expectations of reaching over 1 million TPS through the upcoming Firedancer validator. These numbers, based on testnet results, are impressive compared to Ethereum’s average of 15–30 TPS.

However, this performance comes with trade-offs. Solana’s design includes a leader node that sequences transactions. While this improves throughput, it introduces centralization risks. The network is distributed, but not truly decentralized. That distinction matters—especially in a world where institutions prioritize political neutrality and censorship resistance.

Still, not every use case requires deep decentralization. For example, internal CBDCs or consumer-facing applications in gaming and fintech may benefit from Solana’s throughput and UX. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see state-adapted versions of Solana deployed in controlled environments.

Yet despite Solana’s momentum, Ethereum remains the platform of choice for what I call “serious money.”

Structural Soundness vs. Mass Adoption

The core DeFi debate in 2025—and beyond—centers on what the sector should optimize for: structural integrity or mass adoption? Should we build resilient, decentralized, and composable systems, even if they’re slower and more complex? Or prioritize scale and UX at the expense of core crypto values?

Chasing adoption without structural soundness is short-sighted. If protocols compromise on security or decentralization, regulators will inevitably impose the same constraints that burden traditional finance. At that point, the promise of DeFi would be lost.

That’s why institutional capital continues to favor Ethereum—and why I believe that preference will hold. Neutrality and security can’t be retrofitted; they must be built into the base layer from the start.

If we want DeFi to outlast the hype cycles and form the backbone of a new global financial order, Ethereum offers the most robust path forward. It gives us the best shot at building financial rails that are resilient, secure, and unco-optable.

Mentioned in this article

Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution Optimism is set to update its governance system for the second time this year — this time, with the intent of becoming more decentralized.

In a blog post on Friday, the Optimism team said the changes taking effect Aug. 1 as part of the “Season 8” revamp will introduce stakeholder voting, a public definition of citizenship and an auto-pass process for proposals. 

“The goal has always been to create a governance model designed for a new internet; now we understand that means lowering platform risk by creating accountability where corporate governance models have failed to do so,” the team said. 

The previous season, which lasted from Jan. 16 to June 11, was focused on interoperability.

OP governance aims to reduce platform risk

The Optimism team said it has created four stakeholder groups: tokenholders, end-users, apps and chains, to ensure all can vote on governance proposals. 

“Season 8 takes steps to ensure governance is accountable to all major stakeholders of the Collective, not just financial ones, a key weakness of traditional corporate and crypto governance models,” the team said. 

“The goal is to reduce the platform risk that any one stakeholder dominates decision making at the expense of others.” 

Citizenship still in experimentation stage 

Two houses govern Optimism: the Token House and the Citizens’ House. The Citizens House, introduced in April 2022, allows one vote per citizen. 

The Token House can vote on issues such as protocol upgrades, sequencer selection and governance fund allocation through token-weighted votes. 

Tokenholders will continue to be represented as a key stakeholder group via a token-weighted voting model in the Token House.

Optimism now also has a public definition of citizenship verifiable onchain and has subdivided it into three categories: end-users, apps and chains. 

However, the team also said citizenship “remains an experiment” at this point, and current citizenship doesn’t guarantee it in future updates. 

Proposals auto-pass unless a stakeholder vetoes

A new approval process will also take effect in August, where most will follow “an optimistic approval process,” which allows it to auto-pass unless a stakeholder vetoes.

The goal is to ensure busy contributors can still keep the system in check without full-time politics, according to the Optimism team. 

Related: ASTR becomes OP Superchain’s first interoperable token via Chainlink CCIP

“Participating in governance should not require spending hours reading forum posts and navigating complex bureaucracy. Being a governance participant should not be a full time, or part time, job,” they said. 

Resource budgets will be proposed by the budget board and passed unless vetoed as well. Protocol upgrades are going to be voted on by an independent developer advisory board, which will act on behalf of both the Token House and the Citizens’ House.

Magazine: MegaETH launch could save Ethereum… but at what cost?

]]> https://earlybirdsinvest.com/optimism-targets-decentralization-with-season-8-governance-revamp/feed/ 0 42476 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/crypto-was-never-about-decentralization-it-is-about-pluralism/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/crypto-was-never-about-decentralization-it-is-about-pluralism/#respond Sun, 08 Jun 2025 20:15:13 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/crypto-was-never-about-decentralization-it-is-about-pluralism/

Zcash was built to give people the power to transact freely. Privacy and self-sovereignty are at the heart of that mission. Now, through the Maya Protocol integration, Zcash unlocks decentralized liquidity, cross-chain interoperability, and new ways to use ZEC.

Why This Matters

Zcash and Maya are built on deeply aligned principles. Zcash defends privacy and personal agency; Maya champions decentralization and open, permissionless access. Together, these values empower users to control their money and their data.

With ZEC now live on Maya Protocol, Zcash gains native access to a permissionless, decentralized, cross-chain liquidity network for truly decentralized asset swaps. This means ZEC holders can swap between assets with multiple chains without relying on centralized exchanges.

In a world where privacy is under attack and centralized exchanges are being pressured to delist privacy coins, access to decentralized liquidity isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential. Unlike centralized exchanges, which require personal information and can delist assets under regulatory pressure, decentralized networks like Maya allow users to trade freely. No accounts. No gatekeepers. Just self-custody and freedom of movement.

Next: Maya + Zashi

ECC is already working to bring Maya integration into Zashi, our mobile wallet for shielded ZEC. That means:

• Cross-Chain Payments: Spend shielded ZEC across chains
• Maya-Powered Swaps: Swap ZEC for Maya-supported assets

Both of these features are high-priority items that are already on the Zashi roadmap for 2025.

Stay Tuned

Privacy, self-sovereignty, and decentralization form the foundation of a more open and equitable financial system. By integrating with Maya, Zcash becomes more accessible and resilient, strengthening these principles.

DEX access ensures that ZEC users have ways to move, trade, and spend—even in environments where privacy is unwelcome. It’s a crucial part of future-proofing the Zcash ecosystem and giving people more ways to use private money on their terms.

In the coming months, we’ll share more updates on the Zashi-Maya integration. If you believe in private, decentralized money—this is just the beginning.

Onward.

Plus: Robinhood wants to deliver you cash IRL

GM. Today’s market feels like a fruit cocktail: a weird mix, but we’re here to make sure it’s worth the sip.

Trader vs Hyperliquid.

News drops: Robinhood will launch DoorDash for cash, Binance exec spills the tea on his time in Nigeria + more

Market flavor today

Fear walked back into the chat, and major cryptos are slipping.

Why? Tariffs.

(What a surprise… as if it hasn’t been the reason for like a month now).

Donald Trump announced a 25% tax on all cars and car parts coming into the US.

That’s a big deal since the US imported around 8 million cars last year, worth about $240B – basically half of all cars sold in the US.

Trump says this will be great for the American car industry – more jobs, more investment…

However, experts are like, “uhh… yeah this will prolly backfire.” They think some US car factories could temporarily shut down, cars could get more expensive, and US trading partners could get pretty mad.

And it’s just the beginning – Trump plans to announce even more tariffs on April 2.

In fact, he’s already throwing hands: Trump warned that if the EU works with Canada to do economic harm to the US, he’ll hit both of them with even bigger tariffs than he’s already planned.

Funny timing here btw, since this rant came just days after some analysts had started to believe the whole tariff thing wasn’t gonna be as bad as feared + uncertainty will end.

The Kobeissi Letter never bought into the calm tho’ – they’ve been warning that things will prolly get even messier.

Here’s what they mean:

• Markets got too chill now: for the past week, there weren’t any big tariff updates, so investors started thinking the worst was over. That all went out the window today with the car tariff announcement tho’;

• The tariff uncertainty won’t end with the announcement: Barclays is warning that those tariffs could hit up to 25 countries – and they’re expected to respond with their own taxes. So, we’ve got a potential trade war looming;

• Trump’s not trying to avoid pain. His idea seems to be: suffer now, win later. And with inflation still running hot, the Fed might just roll with it too.

A whole lotta mess, basically.

BUT here’s the fun part (kinda): while stock markets are tanking ($400+ billion lost in tech alone this week), Bitcoin and other cryptos have actually recovered over the past few days.

And if tomorrow’s inflation report looks good, we could go even higher.

Plus, people online are feeling bullish too – Santiment says for every 1 negative crypto post, there are 18 positive ones.

Part of this good mood comes from institutions getting involved in Bitcoin:

• GameStop is investing in Bitcoin (as we mentioned yesterday);

• Bitcoin ETFs are still getting inflows;

• And a European Bitcoin treasury company called The Blockchain Group bought 580 more BTC.

So yeah, crypto’s kinda showing strength right now, but let’s not get too comfy. It could all change again tomorrow in this economy.

Memecoin harvest

Imagine explaining to your accountant that your biggest win this year came from these:

Data as of 09:00 AM EST.

Check out these memecoins and plenty more here.

Once upon a time (which is like, now), there was Hyperliquid – a decentralized exchange where you can bet on crypto prices going up or down (these are called perpetual contracts or “perps” if you’re one of the cool kids ).

It was having a good time on Earth – until one day (yesterday) its peace was disrupted by… an evil trader.

Here’s what went down:

• First, the trader opened an $8M short on a memecoin called JELLY – basically, he was betting its price would go down.

• Then, he removed his margin – the money you’re supposed to leave in the trade to prove you can cover your losses – which basically dumped the trade into Hyperliquid’s vault (aka HLP);

• Now, HLP had no choice but to hold the short – keep it open, pay interest, and risk getting wrecked if JELLY’s went up.

And guess what this tricky Ricky trader did next?

YUP, he started pumping JELLY – sent its market cap from $10M to over $50M in less than an hour.

Kachow – HLP was now down $12M on paper.

Then, a second wallet came into the equation, opened a long position (betting the price would go up), and made $8.2M.

Now, if JELLY had hit a market cap of $150M, the entire HLP vault could’ve been wiped out.

So the Hyperliquid team had to make a choice:

Let the protocol burn in the name of decentralization…

or

Step in and hit the emergency button.

They picked the button.

Validators delisted JELLY, changed its price way down, and force-closed all open positions.

Everyone except the suspicious wallets got automatically refunded, and what could’ve been a $12M disaster turned into a $700K profit.

As for the trader? He put in $7M, pulled out $6M, and still has around $1M that he is currently unable to withdraw.

(And might never get back, depending on how Hyperliquid plays it.)

The moral of the story:

Decentralized perps can get really crazy – one trader can push the whole system to its limits.

Hyperliquid reacted fast and saved the vault – but it also left people wondering:

How decentralized is “decentralized” when things go the wrong way?..

News drops

Robinhood’s cooking up some new features, and one of them is cash delivery straight to your doorstep. Yup, like ordering a pizza.

A new poll shows that Argentinians don’t trust President Javier Milei anymore after the LIBRA memecoin scandal. Still, his political party – La Libertad Avanza – is holding strong heading into the next election.

Crypto companies are asking Congress to tell the DOJ to back off. They say the way the DOJ is handling the Tornado Cash case is way over the top – and could put any blockchain dev at risk of getting charged just for building stuff.

Binance exec Tigran Gambaryan spilled the tea on his 8-month “stay” in Nigeria. He says the government basically held him hostage and used fake charges to try and get something from Binance.

Trump might soon kill off a rule that would’ve made DeFi protocols report to the IRS. The Senate already voted to get rid of it.

Juicy memes

The blockchain revolution, along with crypto assets, gives people fresh choices to manage wealth as well as investments. Digital money presents opportunities that did not exist before. The ability to trade without intermediaries offers real independence. The shift toward direct control lets regular citizens participate in the monetary system a lot more directly than before. A direct person-to-person approach represents a very different path from the old banking model.

The appeal of decentralization lies in how it makes financial services democratic for everyone. Direct transactions between users reduce fees and barriers that banks create. Decentralized finance platforms let people lend, borrow or trade assets without a middleman’s involvement. A very inclusive approach really helps individuals who traditional banks have left behind or rejected.

The government’s control of monetary policies creates economic instability at times. Central banks impact citizens’ purchasing power through interest rate changes or implementing quantitative easing measures. Such actions make wealth preservation really difficult for people, particularly when inflation erodes the value of savings. Decentralization works independently of this control and complicated regulations.

It allows for greater flexibility in terms of investment and asset management. Early-stage crypto opportunities present significant upside potential, enabling individuals to enter markets that were previously out of reach for the average investor. This democratization of financial opportunities could lead to greater wealth-building potential, especially in regions where access to traditional investment avenues is limited.

According to Charles d’Haussy, CEO of the dYdX Foundation, an independent nonprofit focused on DeFi, the crypto market might soon experience a period of big interest that might result in rapid growth and a sustained period of expansion. “We’re seeing signs that major DeFi platforms are preparing to onboard institutional players. Just look at Lido’s latest update,” d’Haussy noted.

In August, Lido Finance, the leading liquid staking protocol launched “Lido Institutional”, a liquidity staking solution tailored to large clients, like asset managers, custodians, and exchanges. The upcoming upswing will most likely attract a wider audience that offers more opportunities to enter the DeFi space, also allowing established projects to thrive.

A centralized financial system restricts personal choices through rules or policies. Decentralization moves authority and decisions away from a central entity. The finance industry now includes DeFi platforms along with digital currencies, which operate without oversight from a single organization. Blockchain systems allow direct transactions between users, eliminating the need for banks or government institutions as middlemen.

A very significant feature of these platforms lies in their independence from traditional financial gatekeepers. Government limits include capital restrictions and constant monitoring of transactions, alongside artificial currency adjustments. These regulations affect how people handle money or invest.

Critics point out that too much state control slows down new developments in finance as well as personal opportunities to build wealth. When authorities step in to handle economic problems, people really lose some freedom to make independent money decisions. The system forces individuals to accept specific trade-offs that reduce their financial independence.

Decentralized networks offer multiple benefits for financial independence. A major advantage comes from its privacy features. The systems let users stay anonymous during money transfers. Traditional banks need personal data, but decentralized platforms protect user identities. Such protection really helps people who live under strict financial monitoring or in places with limited privacy rights.

Direct person-to-person transfers cut the need for banks or financial firms. Users pay lower fees along with faster money movement. Decentralized platforms transfer funds across borders almost instantly, while regular banks often need several days for international transactions.

Moreover, decentralized systems are more resistant to censorship compared to centralized networks, where authorities can block or restrict transactions for political, social, or economic reasons. In decentralized platforms, there is no central authority with the power to unilaterally block transactions, which is particularly valuable in regions with restrictive financial regulations or authoritarian governments.

Anyone with internet access can use these financial services, regardless of location. Decentralized finance thus presents a practical choice for communities that lack standard banking options, especially in regions with basic financial systems.

A case for state-controlled financial systems points out that central oversight maintains economic stability and protects consumers. The government sets monetary guidelines by modifying interest rates to control inflation and promote economic development. Central banks serve a fundamental purpose in keeping people’s confidence by supervising financial firms, alongside stopping criminal activities.

During the 2008 crisis, national banks across countries took action to create stability via interest rate changes, besides offering financial support to major institutions. Such measures showed how central authorities dealt with system-wide risks or kept public trust intact. The global economy faced a really severe downturn without these actions.

This is a third party-distributed Press Release, BitDegree is not responsible for any content or related materials, the advertising, promotion, accuracy, quality, products or services on this page. Before making any decisions or taking any actions, readers are advised to do their own research, first. BitDegree is not liable nor responsible for any direct or indirect loss or damage related directly or indirectly to the use of any products, services or content in the Press Release.