The notice, which has appeared in new releases like Jurassic World Rebirth and How to Train Your Dragon, tells AI developers that the material “may not be used to train AI”.

At the same time, AI company Midjourney is defending itself in court against a lawsuit filed by major studios, including Disney and Universal. The case claimed that Midjourney helped users create unapproved images that closely resemble characters from films such as Star Wars and The Avengers.

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe – We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

How do Cryptocurrency Exchanges Work? (Easily Explained!)

Midjourney filed a 43-page statement pushing back against the claims. The company argued that copyright law does not give creators complete control over how their work is used.

It pointed to the principle of “fair use”, which allows some types of reuse, especially when it supports free access to ideas or transforms the original work in a meaningful way.

Midjourney also brought up an apparent contradiction in the studios’ behavior. According to its court filing, many people using the platform have email addresses from Disney and Universal.

In addition, Midjourney argued that the studios failed to properly report which specific images or links were a problem. Under US copyright law, companies usually must provide exact examples when making a takedown request.

Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers recently asked the US Commerce Department to look into DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company. What did they say? Read the full story.

The lawsuit was filed by 13 authors, including Sarah Silverman, Junot Díaz, and Andrew Sean Greer. They argued that Meta’s use of their books to build language models was a copyright violation.

However, Judge Vince Chhabria said in a June 25 court document that the authors did not provide enough proof that Meta’s actions harmed the market for their work. He explained that their claims lacked detail and did not demonstrate how the AI tools might reduce demand for their books or affect future sales.

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe – We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

How to Store NFTs in 2023 (3 Most Secure Ways Explained)

Without this kind of evidence, he found the use to fall under what the law allows as “fair use”.

Still, Judge Chhabria noted that this decision should not be taken as approval of how tech companies are collecting and using copyrighted material. He stated that the ruling only applies to this specific case and should not be seen as a statement about AI training practices in general.

In his ruling, Judge Chhabria stated that AI systems can produce huge amounts of content very quickly, which could reduce the need for human-made work. If that happens, it might lower the value of creative work and discourage people from making it in the first place.

On June 23, Judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic’s use of legally purchased books to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models was lawful. What did he say? Read the full story.

Their message comes in response to companies like Google and OpenAI, which have asked the government to loosen these rules to allow AI systems to use copyrighted content for training.

In February, the White House invited public input on AI policies that could shape the country’s approach to this growing technology.

Did you know?

Want to get smarter & wealthier with crypto?

Subscribe – We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!

Can Russia Use Crypto to Bypass Sanctions? (Animated)

The letter argues that while AI innovation is important, it should not come at the expense of creative industries. It highlights that entertainment and the arts provide jobs for over 2.3 million people in the US, which generates more than $229 billion in wages.

The signers warn that weakening copyright laws would affect not only filmmakers, musicians, and writers but also professionals in publishing, journalism, and research.

Furthermore, the letter, also backed by figures like Rian Johnson, Aubrey Plaza, Carrie Coon, and Taika Waititi, raised concerns about changes to fair use laws. It reads:

Make no mistake: This issue goes well beyond the entertainment industry, as the right to train AI on all copyright-protected content impacts all of America’s knowledge industries.

The letter adds that giving AI companies unrestricted access to copyrighted material could harm industries that rely on intellectual property protection.

Meanwhile, AI experts Andrew Barto and Richard Sutton recently expressed concerns that AI was being developed and released without enough safety measures. What did they say? Read the full story.