A majority of crypto users are willing to allow artificial intelligence agents to manage part of their investment portfolios, according to the results of a recent CoinGecko survey.

Among the 2,632 crypto participants surveyed, 87% said they would let AI agents manage at least a tenth of their crypto portfolio, CoinGecko’s April 23 report shows.

Around half the respondents said they were willing to let an AI agent manage half their portfolio or less.

“This suggests that despite having doubts as to how safe or secure AI agents are, crypto users are still mainly curious about the technology and want to try using them for trading or investing,” CoinGecko research analyst Yuqian Lim said.

At the same time, around 36% of survey participants said they would allow AI agents to manage the majority of their holdings. A smaller group, roughly 14.5%, were willing to leave their entire crypto portfolio in the digital hands of an AI agent.

“In other words, 1 in 7 participants either think they can completely trust AI agents with all of their crypto, or believe the potential profits will outweigh the risks, or simply have a high risk tolerance for their crypto holdings,” Lim said.

Mixed opinions on human vs AI trading

However, opinions were mixed on whether AI agents would be better than humans at crypto trading and investing overall. There was a roughly even split, with half of the respondents saying AI agents would be better than humans at crypto trading and investing most of the time.

“That said, the remaining half of survey participants believed AI does not have an edge over humans in the crypto market yet, which suggests that opinions are still divided over this comparison,” Lim said.

About 13%, or 1 in 8, said they weren’t comfortable leaving any of their portfolios for management by AI or thought they could manage their crypto stash better than an AI agent. 

The same survey found that participants had very mixed views on whether AI agents could be trusted with access to people’s crypto wallets.

“Specifically, 37.5% indicated that they do not trust AI agents with their crypto wallets, while a slightly lower 34.5% said they can be trusted and 27.9% were neutral on the matter,” Lim said.

Related: AI, blockchain convergence to bring ‘watershed moments’ in 2025

Agentic AI is already being used to build Web3 applications, launch tokens, and interact with people autonomously. Some platforms have also been exploring the use of AI agents for trading.

Last December, crypto industry execs told Cointelegraph they expected AI agents to transform Web3 in 2025, flagging crypto staking and onchain trading as emerging early use cases. However, there was also speculation that AI would face headwinds, including technical challenges, regulatory hurdles, and centralization. 

Magazine: UK’s Orwellian AI murder prediction system, will AI take your job? AI Eye

Smartwatches have tracked sleep for years, but as we see more sleep coaching, energy scores, sleep apnea detection, and general AI analysis, it’s fair to question how accurate a Pixel Watch’s data is compared to, say, a polysomnogram or actigraphy watch.

So I sat down with Dr. Logan Schneider — an associate professor at Stanford University and Google’s clinical lead for sleep health — and had a frank discussion about the usefulness, limits, and future of smartwatch sleep tracking.

Google frequently enlists practicing doctors to work with its engineers on health and wellness features. Earlier this month, I previously interviewed Google’s clinical lead of heart health, Dr. Shreibati, about Loss of Pulse and how smartwatches will eventually deliver “personalized” diagnoses for heart conditions.

In this case, Dr. Schneider, who worked on projects like the animal-themed sleep profiles on Fitbits and Soli-powered sleep tracking on the Nest Hub, had plenty of insights about how clinically useful these kinds of consumer-tech devices can be compared to medical-grade tech.

The science behind smartwatch sleep tracking

When it comes to studying sleep patterns on an individual or population level, polysomnograms are “impractically expensive, time-consuming, and resource intensive,” says Dr. Schneider.

A smartwatch is physically incapable of tracking brain waves (EEGs), eye movement, and some full-body motions that a clinical sleep study can detect. However, it does capture enough useful data to extrapolate the essentials without getting health insurance involved.

That’s why Schneider saw the advent of smartwatches as an opportunity to “understand sleep in a novel way, looking at population health, looking at real world changes in sleep over time,” and began reaching out to tech companies like Google. Smartwatches fill a niche that polysomnograms can’t.

I asked Dr. Schneider to give a clinical run-down of how sleep tracking works. He explained how your “body’s physiology and its state of motion versus immobility recapitulates what’s going on in the brain” and how they can determine your “rest and digest” or “fight or flight” states as a reflection of your brain states.

Heart rate is an obvious tool for sleep stage approximation, but he put even more emphasis on movement tracking as a vital tool. The inactivity of deep sleep, twitchy paralysis of REM, and more frequent movement in light sleep can all be estimated by your watch’s accelerometer.

False-positive movements — like when your partner shifts the bed while you’re in deep sleep — can be one of the big factors when your watch gets sleep estimates wrong. That’s why Schneider remains proud of their work taking the Nest Hub’s Soli radar and turning it into a “full body actigraph and cardiopulmonary physiology sensor that could stage sleep quite accurately” because it gets a wider view of your body.

Ultimately, Schneider believes, smartwatches “can only get so good until you’re literally starting to look at the brain waves.”

The challenges of making wrist-based sleep data more accurate

I asked Dr. Schneider what, if anything, could make smartwatch sleep data better without EEG tech. He argued there probably isn’t some “gold signal” that makes things perfect, but that isn’t strictly necessary.

The main key for accuracy, he explained, is having “redundant signals.” Neurologists looking for a brain issue don’t go straight for the MRI or scalpel; they might test your muscular reflexes to catch a “dysfunction” first. Since there are “several different types of redundant signals of the autonomic nervous system,” smartwatch brands can look at those secondary sources and get more reliable results.

We already see that with factors like heart rate variability (HRV), breathing rate, and skin temperature, as secondary information for whether your body is “normal” or if something is trending wrong.

One potentially new smartwatch metric Schneider brought up was “galvanic skin response.” Essentially, if you look at your skin’s sweat creation and salt content, you can determine your body’s sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response and see, for instance, when your sleep state is unstable.

The Pixel Watch 3 and Fitbit Sense 2 have a cEDA sensor that looks at sweat levels on your skin, primarily for stress detection. That seems like a perfect fit for using sweat levels to improve sleep accuracy, but I didn’t think to ask about this during the interview. Maybe we’ll see this in the future!

But ultimately, it comes back to Google’s PPG. He credited Google’s engineers for “optimizing the signal acquisition and quality,” as well as the multi-path optical sensor that ensures reliable, continuous data that approaches what you’d get from a “gold standard polysomnogram.”

For what it’s worth, testers like the Qualified Scientist say the Pixel Watch 3 is highly reliable for sleep accuracy. But Dr. Schneider still says that “there’s some general event horizon where you’re never going to get on the wrist a measure of what’s going on in the brain.”

Smartwatch sleep tracking has untapped clinical potential

I asked Dr. Schneider about the recent trend of smartwatches and smart rings starting to detect sleep apnea and if there are other potential sleep conditions (aka parasomnias) that he believes smartwatches could detect.

He very enthusiastically responded that “it could be a great opportunity for tech like this to actually pick up on” conditions like Restless Leg Syndrome and sleepwalking that can be difficult to catch in limited clinical contexts but that a smartwatch will detect with enough patience.

Smartwatches will need to be able to differentiate between REM behavior disorders (e.g., sleep paralysis), non-REM parasomnias ranging from sleepwalking to sleep talking and even sleep eating disorders, and seizure disorders.

Dr. Schneider seems very optimistic that watches could “pick up on interesting signals” in the future, “depending upon what set of sensors you have.”

This would have a direct clinical application, too. After someone is treated for a sleep disorder, it’s hard to determine if you’re “truly” cured or just have “fewer episodes that you’re aware of.” A smartwatch could passively solve that mystery and give patients (and doctors) peace of mind.

Why sleep tracking matters to you and me

I have a complicated relationship with sleep tracking. I wrote last year about how I hated wearing a smartwatch to bed, and I’ve found that seeing bad sleep data can often compound my stress. So I asked Dr. Schneider why people can’t trust their own bodies to feel how tired they are.

He responded with an anecdote about a man who said he was sleeping great while not believing his wife, who said he was “dying” at night and falling asleep at the wheel.

“People are terrible estimators. And why is that? Our brain habituates to our current state of being,” he explained. You can function with a “severe amount of sleep impairment that you’re not even fully cognizant of,” and sometimes you need help recognizing that.

He believes it’s worth the discomfort of a smartwatch to have this self-knowledge. And since he has to “convince people to wear a Darth Vader mask every single night” for sleep apnea, he thinks it’s worth getting accustomed to some form factor of wearable tech to help you “figure out how you’re feeling.”

But if, like me, a smartwatch isn’t the right fit for you, then Dr. Schneider thinks you really should consider that Nest Hub radar. To which I’d say, if Google hurries up and makes a 3rd-gen Nest Hub with Gemini, I’ll consider it!

03 March Bitcoin Lightning Network: 10 years, yet very cool!

Bitcoin Lightning Network – Bitcoin’s silent hero is now 10 years old! And this is a layer 2 solution that allows Bitcoin process transactions to be faster, cheaper and more convenient in everyday life. Thanks to Lightning, you can buy coffee or send international money without worrying about costs or long waits.

What’s so cool about lightning?

In short, the Lightning network is the second network that runs on the Bitcoin blockchain. Instead of writing each transaction on the blockchain (time-consuming fees), Lightning creates a payment channel for trading outside the chain. The final result is recorded only if the channel is closed. This reduces the load on the main network, reduces cost costs, and significantly increases speed.

Furthermore, lightning remains decentralized and is Bitcoin security. Without leaning against a third party, you have full control over your money. Have you heard it already?

Try Thunder Bitcoin here!

10 -YEAR Lightning’s Journey

The technology grew dramatically in 2015 when Joseph Poon and Thadeus Dreyer introduced the idea of ​​lightning. In 2019, Bitfinex became the first major trading floor to integrate Lightning, paving the way for a wide range of applications. By 2025, Lightning supports countless interesting applications, including streaming payments for social networks (Nostr’s Zaps), streaming payments for musicians (Podcasting 2.0, Wavlake), and even sharing money in the El Salvador coffee supply chain.

El Salvador: Bitcoin + Lightning = Where Heaven gave birth to a couple!

Have you heard of Bitcoin Beach? This is where the lightning really shines! In Elzonte, people use lightning bolts to pay from buying food to surfing. With the success of this model, President Nayib Bukele has transformed Bitcoin into legal money for El Salvador. Chivo Wallet Integrated Lightning Integrates makes it easy to transfer money at near zero costs.

Not only that, but in small communities like Berlin, Lightning also promotes comprehensive funding and helps people escape cash addiction.

Is the Lightning Wallet easy to use?

yes! Blink Wallet is a very user-friendly lightning wallet. Simply download the app, sign up via email or phone number and you’re ready to experience super speed trading. In particular, Blink also has a “stable,” which helps maintain a stable value in your wallet. It’s convenient to avoid fluctuations in Bitcoin prices!

Do you have a lightning network wallet? Discover it now!

Blink Lightning Network Wallet offers a reasonable and accessible way to manage Bitcoin, providing fast user setup capabilities.

Download Blink Wallet to Android

Download Blink Wallet to iOS

in short,: Ten years later, Lightning Network not only proves the expansion of Bitcoin, but also brings countless interesting applications to life. Micropayments, remittances and lightning into the circular economy are gradually transforming Bitcoin into a true global financial system. Try using lightning today – maybe you’ll be a pioneer in the cryptocurrency era!

Don’t forget to follow the bitfinex Vietnam Community telegram, Twitter & Facebook To update articles, information and events as soon as possible!

]]> https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoin-lightning-network-10-years-yet-very-cool/feed/ 0 23551