Ripple chief technology officer (CTO) David “JoelKatz” Schwartz used a late-Wednesday post on X to frame a surge of payments and stablecoin companies launching their own base-layer networks as validation of blockchain’s role in finance—and to restate how the XRP Ledger’s design differs from the new entrants.

“We’ve been seeing more and more players in the payments and stablecoins space launch their own blockchains. To me, that’s a clear sign the market sees blockchain as core financial infrastructure — something we’ve believed in and have been building toward on the XRP Ledger for over 13 years,” he wrote, adding, “Launching a blockchain is hard. Building an ecosystem with developers, liquidity, trust, and real-world usage is even harder.”

Competition For Ripple And The XRP Ledger?

Schwartz situated XRPL’s posture in the long-running debate over network governance. “Some blockchains are built with permissioned validator sets controlled by one entity or a small group. This can provide control and compliance for specific, closed-network scenarios, but it limits reach, resilience, and the ability for anyone to contribute to securing and growing the network,” he wrote.

Related Reading

“As many of you know, the XRPL is public and permissionless at its core, with optional permissioned features for regulated use cases.” He argued that the ledger’s open base “makes it adaptable, interoperable, and well-positioned to serve as critical infrastructure for the world’s financial system — connecting assets, markets, and participants seamlessly across borders.”

The remarks arrive as two US fintech heavyweights move into L1 territory. Circle this week unveiled Arc, an EVM-compatible Layer-1 it says is “purpose-built for stablecoin finance,” with dollar-denominated fees (USDC as native gas), opt-in privacy, a built-in RFQ-style FX engine, and “deterministic sub-second settlement finality” via the Malachite consensus engine. Circle says Arc will enter private testnet in the coming weeks, target public testnet in the fall, and a mainnet beta in 2026.

Separately, Stripe is developing Tempo, a high-performance, payments-focused L1 being built in partnership with crypto VC firm Paradigm. Tempo is designed to run code compatible with Ethereum, is currently in stealth with a small team, and it remains unclear whether it will have a native token.

Schwartz also highlighted specific XRPL design choices he sees as aligned with financial-grade settlement. “It’s encouraging to see some newer chains adopt design choices that have long been part of the XRPL’s architecture, like deterministic finality … It shows there’s growing alignment in the industry on the importance of predictable, reliable settlement for financial applications without expensive validation,” he wrote.

He reiterated that XRPL fees are meant to stay “low and predictable, just fractions of a cent, without a separate gas token,” noting that “every transaction on the XRPL uses/burns XRP.” XRPL’s technical documentation specifies that each transaction destroys a small amount of XRP as an anti-spam fee, and describes consensus rules aimed at deterministic ordering and finality.

Related Reading

Where Schwartz drew a line was on governance flexibility. He acknowledged that permissioned validator sets can make sense for “specific, closed-network scenarios,” but underscored XRPL’s approach: a public, permissionless core with opt-in controls for compliance needs.

The ledger’s native features include Authorized Trust Lines, Deposit Authorization/Preauthorization, and issuer-level freeze tooling for issued assets—not for XRP itself—allowing regulated token issuers to gate or police flows without converting the entire network into a walled garden. XRPL’s own FAQ emphasizes that it is a decentralized, public blockchain where changes require supermajority validator approval.

The strategic contrast with the new fintech chains is already visible. Arc explicitly centers USDC—making fees dollar-denominated and embedding Circle’s payments stack—whereas XRPL retains XRP for fees and settlement while supporting issued assets through trust-line mechanics. If Tempo proceeds as reported, Stripe would be pursuing an Ethereum-compatible L1 optimized for predictable payments performance, potentially mirroring Arc’s enterprise-centric pitch but with a broader merchant-services integration surface.

Schwartz closed on a deliberately expansive note about the competitive set: “Looking forward to the next phase of XRPL innovations, bringing more programmability, compliance-grade capabilities, and deeper liquidity for institutional use,” he wrote—before welcoming rivals: “And to those just getting started… Welcome to the party! The crypto tent is only getting bigger.”

At press time, XRP traded at $3.23.

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Zoom image will be displayed

Welcome to the official guide for the GVNR x Carbon DeFi Trading Competition.

This guide covers everything you need to participate confidently — including strategy types, detailed examples, eligibility requirements, and answers to frequently asked questions.

A wide range of liquidity strategies can be deployed on Carbon DeFi in just a couple clicks, including:

• Native Onchain Limit and Range Orders
  Execute one-time trades at specific prices (limit order) or within a specific range of prices (range order).
• Automated Recurring Strategies
  Buy in one price point or range and sell in a higher price point or range, on repeat. Carbon DeFi automatically shifts liquidity between the buy and sell orders as they are filled.
• Concentrated Liquidity Strategies
  A concentrated liquidity position where you buy and sell in a custom price range, used to create a bid-ask spread that moves as the market does.

Visit the Carbon DeFi FAQs for additional information on creating a trading strategy.

X’s Grok chatbot declined to select a winner for a $1,000 Ethereum giveaway organized by crypto influencer Crypto Rover, citing prior allegations of pump-and-dump activity detailed by on-chain investigator ZachXBT.

In replies to users participating in the weekend contest, Grok stated it was abstaining from choosing a winner due to “substantiated reports” implicating Rover in schemes that could compromise community safety.

The messages are now unavailable but circulated in screenshots showing Grok referencing ZachXBT’s findings and calling for caution. The interaction stemmed from a routine promotional giveaway in which Rover, who posts under @rovercrc and has over 1 million followers, invited users to like, repost, and follow his account for a chance to win the prize.

As ZachXBT reported, the allegations center on a project Rover was contracted to promote in May 2023. The deal included a $10,000 payment, a percentage of the project’s token supply.

According to the investigation, Rover made no promotional posts as agreed and later claimed he would delay content until “better market conditions,” while threatening legal action against the project’s team for attempting to call him out.

ZachXBT linked Rover’s wallet activity to subsequent token sales, generating roughly 40 ETH in profits. The funds were routed to a known Bybit deposit address previously associated with Rover.

The probe also identified 10 fresh wallets tied to the same promotional period that accumulated 9 percent of the token’s supply shortly before Rover posted about the asset. The project team behind the meme coin ceased communications shortly after, with no further updates beyond May 2023. In previous posts, Rover reportedly stated he could “pump projects from half a million to ten million easy,” a remark ZachXBT highlighted as part of a broader pattern of manipulative behavior.

Rover did not publicly address Grok’s specific decision and has continued to tag Grok for his next giveaway.

Not all of Grok’s responses refused to engage with Crypto Rover. Many replies to Crypto Rover and his followers affirmed that the bot would select a winner for the giveaway. However, per the latest posts, none was chosen by the bot.

Grok, developed by xAI, has previously drawn scrutiny for its erratic output, including unverified claims and inflammatory responses, though its creators position it as a “maximally truth-seeking” assistant.

ZachXBT’s forensic investigations have become a fixture in crypto accountability circles, with previous work cited in law enforcement actions and asset recoveries totaling over US $210 million, per a 2024 Wired profile.

Mentioned in this article

Financial services giant Charles Schwab could soon roll out Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) trading, according to the firm’s chief executive.

Charles Schwab CEO Rick Wurster says in a new interview with CNBC that they want to expand services for their clients, who are already significantly invested in crypto.

“Our clients hold more than 20% of the exchange-traded product crypto in the entire industry, so they’re invested. It’s still only about $25 billion out of the $10.8 trillion that our clients have, so it’s still relatively small, but our clients own a big part of the market.

We also anticipate launching Bitcoin and Ether sometime soon so our clients have access to that, and we think that’ll be an acceleration of our growth, because what we hear from many of our clients are that they have 98% of their wealth here at Schwab, and they might hold a percent or 2% at some digital native firm to hold their crypto, and they really want to bring it back to Schwab because they trust us, they want it to sit alongside their other assets, and so we think we’ll see some real growth when we bring those to market.” 

When asked if they plan to compete directly with Coinbase, Wurster responded, “Absolutely.”

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram

Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

&nbsp

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/Bruce Rolff

Intel (INTC 2.16%) launched its Arrow Lake family of desktop central processing units (CPUs), officially the Core Ultra 200 series, in late 2024. The company outsourced most of the manufacturing to TSMC, moved to a chiplet-based architecture, and managed to improve energy efficiency substantially, compared to its previous-generation chips. For productivity tasks, Arrow Lake performed well.

However, there were two problems. First, Arrow Lake’s gaming performance fell flat, losing to Intel’s last-gen chips. Some software fixes have improved the situation, but for those looking to squeeze every last frame per second out of their gaming PC, Arrow Lake isn’t the answer.

Second, pricing was on the high side. Not only were Arrow Lake CPUs expensive on their own, but they also required a new motherboard, making all upgrade paths pricier.

Arrow Lake CPUs have been selling below Intel’s original suggested retail pricing for a while, but the company is now officially slashing prices on one of its chips. The 265K, a mid-range part that was originally priced at $399, now has a suggested retail price of $299. Suggested retail prices for the higher end 285K and the lower end 245K are staying put, although actual retail prices vary.

While Intel’s price cutting is limited, the 265K is in the sweet spot for many potential customers, with most of the performance of the 285K for much less money. Featuring eight performance cores and 12 efficiency cores, the 265K is a solid all-arounder that falls a bit short in gaming and makes a lot more sense at $299 than it did at $399.

Image source: Getty Images.

A sign of things to come?

Intel replaced its CEO in March with Lip-Bu Tan, a veteran of the semiconductor industry and a critic of Intel’s sluggish pace and bureaucratic nature. Tan’s strategy revolves around cutting a bloated cost structure, putting out better products faster, and listening to customers. More aggressive pricing could be part of the equation as Intel looks to make Arrow Lake more competitive.

AMD‘s latest Ryzen 9000 series CPUs didn’t get great reviews, and retail pricing quickly dropped to reflect muted demand. But the Ryzen 9000 series looks a lot better relative to Arrow Lake, especially with Arrow Lake’s sky-high initial pricing.

AMD’s gaming-centric X3D variants, which feature ultra-fast cache memory capable of boosting gaming performance, are the undisputed kings of gaming CPUs. AMD noted in its first-quarter report that there was strong demand for its newest Ryzen chips, likely at the expense of Intel.

Intel also cut the prices of its Granite Rapids server CPUs in January, although there was no official announcement. The Granite Rapids family is the best set of server CPUs that Intel has put out in years, and it largely caught up to AMD in terms of core counts, performance, and efficiency. But like Arrow Lake, pricing skewed high.

There was a time not long ago, before AMD’s comeback, when Intel faced no real competition in either the PC or server CPU markets. The company’s dominance afforded it the ability to price its products high and generate impressive profit margins. With AMD now highly competitive and stealing market share, that era is over. With price cuts for Granite Rapids and Arrow Lake, Intel appears to finally recognize that it needs to compete on price to win back market share.

Intel has a long road ahead as it attempts to turn itself around. If recent price cuts are any indication, more aggressive pricing will likely be part of Tan’s strategy as he looks to stop the bleeding and regain some lost market share from AMD.

The financial services giant Goldman Sachs is telling shareholders that its competitors are now offering crypto products and services that the bank doesn’t.

In its 2024 Annual Report, Goldman Sachs says in some circumstances, rival firms are offering products that clients may prefer, such as specific digital assets, which Goldman cannot or choose not to provide.

According to the bank, the competition could help create better experiences for clients.

Goldman Sachs goes on to say that blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies have enhanced rivalries within the banking industry.

“The growth of electronic trading and the introduction of new products and technologies, including trading and distributed ledger technologies, such as cryptocurrencies, and AI technologies, has increased competition.”

The financial services titan also says it is “exposed to risks” through various activities involving digital assets due to the potential of cyber security incidents.

“Additionally, although the prevalence and scope of applications of distributed ledger technology, cryptocurrency and similar technologies is growing, the technology is nascent and may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks or have other inherent weaknesses.

We are exposed to risks, and may become exposed to additional risks, related to distributed ledger technology, including through our facilitation of clients’ activities involving financial products that use distributed ledger technology, such as blockchain, cryptocurrencies or other digital assets, our investments in companies that seek to develop platforms based on distributed ledger technology, the use of distributed ledger technology by third-party vendors, clients, counterparties, clearinghouses and other financial intermediaries, and the receipt of cryptocurrencies or other digital assets as collateral.”

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram

Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

&nbsp

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any losses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/Pattern Trends/Nikelser Kate