arent – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com Latest Crypto News Sat, 30 Aug 2025 15:32:41 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.7 https://i0.wp.com/earlybirdsinvest.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cropped-New-Project-2024-12-17T235703.455.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 arent – Earlybirds Invest https://earlybirdsinvest.com 32 32 240146708 Bitcoin outflows aren’t benefiting gold; both assets feel the pressure https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoin-outflows-arent-benefiting-gold-both-assets-feel-the-pressure/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoin-outflows-arent-benefiting-gold-both-assets-feel-the-pressure/#respond Sat, 30 Aug 2025 15:32:41 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoin-outflows-arent-benefiting-gold-both-assets-feel-the-pressure/

Recent data from Bitcoin and gold ETFs revealed a departure from historical trends this month: instead of flows moving in opposite directions as they normally do, both Bitcoin and gold experienced outflows at the same time.

This rare correlation speaks volumes about the current macroeconomic environment and shifting investor psychology. Bitcoin outflows didn’t benefit gold, and until the Fed’s path is clearer, both assets remain under pressure.

Bitcoin outflows, hard assets are feeling the pain

Traditionally, when investors pull money out of Bitcoin, gold, the ultimate safe-haven asset, sees a surge in inflows, and vice versa. That’s because Bitcoin and gold are seen as alternative stores of value and hedges against traditional financial market risks.

Bitcoin outflows
Bitcoin outflows aren’t going into gold.

Investors often view them as uncorrelated assets because their prices and demand don’t typically move in tandem with stocks or bonds. However, each asset appeals to different risk appetites and market conditions

Not so this month. Bitcoin ETFs recorded six straight days of outflows, draining nearly $2 billion in late August alone. Meanwhile, outflows from major gold ETFs, such as GLDM, also spiked, with $449 million exiting in just one week.

Despite record Bitcoin outflows and a broader crypto market pullback, Bitcoin ETFs rebounded toward the end of August, with a four-day inflow streak through the pullback. Gold ETFs also saw net inflows during the last days of August 2025, tracking a similar rebound as Bitcoin ETFs, and suggesting a possible change in investor sentiment as the month closes.

Macro uncertainty rules

The backdrop for this unusual behavior is a cocktail of economic crosswinds: uncertainty around Federal Reserve monetary policy, persistent inflation, and signs of a softer labor market. With the Fed’s next move unclear, Bitcoin and gold may not be especially attractive to investors seeking clarity or certainty.

Sticky inflation keeps the Fed hawkish, yet waning job growth undercuts confidence in further rate hikes.

This uncomfortable limbo leaves markets in a risk-off posture, where both speculative and defensive assets struggle to gain traction.

Waiting for the Fed’s next move

Bitcoin, often dubbed “digital gold,” inflows are stalling right now because investors aren’t feeling risk-on. Yet gold, which typically shines in periods of heightened fear, is also not benefiting from Bitcoin outflows.

Inflation concerns and shifting rate expectations are undermining gold’s historic safe-haven narrative. Instead of moving in opposition, both assets faced outflows as investors either shift to cash, seek higher-yielding alternatives, or wait for the Fed’s next move.

Until monetary policy direction becomes clearer, both Bitcoin and gold may continue to face headwinds. Macro investors value certainty, and, at the moment, ambiguity reigns.

This lethal combination makes it difficult for investors to predict whether rates will rise, a recession is coming, or inflation will surge again, leading to broader uncertainty across financial markets.

For now, Bitcoin outflows aren’t benefiting gold, and both assets are caught on the sidelines, waiting for the Fed to declare a new direction.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoin-outflows-arent-benefiting-gold-both-assets-feel-the-pressure/feed/ 0 55899
Google makes great apps, but these aren’t it if you ask me https://earlybirdsinvest.com/google-makes-great-apps-but-these-arent-it-if-you-ask-me/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/google-makes-great-apps-but-these-arent-it-if-you-ask-me/#respond Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:29:20 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/google-makes-great-apps-but-these-arent-it-if-you-ask-me/
youtube music vs spotify 4

Andy Walker / Android Authority

Google is a software company and knows how to make great apps. I mean, I use apps like Gmail, Maps, YouTube, and Drive on a regular basis. Then there are its AI-focused apps like NotebookLM, which is by far the most underrated app in Google’s arsenal.

However, there are a few apps I think are way underdeveloped and need some serious work. They’re simply too basic for me, or lack many of the features you get with the competition. I know Google is all about simplicity at times, but it’s taking things too far with some of its apps.

I want to discuss four of them and explain why I think they desperately need an upgrade. Let’s dive in.

Which of these apps is your least favorite?

65 votes

Google Keep

google keep text formatting 1

Joe Maring / Android Authority

As far as note-taking apps go, Google Keep is as basic as they get. Even fundamental things like text formatting are very basic, with Keep only offering a few options. While the app itself launched over a decade ago, these basic formatting features were only widely rolled out to the Android app in 2023, with the desktop version catching up two months ago.

You have two heading options on offer, as well as the ability to bold, italicize, and underline text. That’s it. You can’t change colors, adjust the font size outside of the available headings, or create a bulleted list.

While you can upload images to a note, you can’t place them in a specific area, as they automatically show up on top. You can create labels to try and organize your notes, but you can’t create notebooks like with most of Google Keep’s competitors.

I get that Google is trying to keep this as a simple note-taking app, since a lot of people are into that. Not everyone wants an app that’s as feature-packed as Evernote or Notion. However, there’s a limit, and I think adding things like improved formatting options and a better system for organizing notes would still retain that simple nature Google is going for and significantly improve the app’s overall usability. I was a Keep user for years but ultimately decided to move to a rival app for these very reasons.

Google Tasks

google tasks feature 1

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I tried this for a while and really wanted to love it, especially since it’s well-integrated with Gemini, but I just can’t stand it. If you think Keep is basic, take a look at Tasks. It’s as barebones as it gets.

I’ve been using Todoist for years, and it still feels like a very simple app to use. However, it’s packed with features that improve the overall experience and don’t get in my way if I don’t want to use them.

I love that I can write out “Do laundry every Wednesday at 6 PM” and the app will create a recurring task right away. Since it supports natural language input, I don’t have to manually select a date or time; I just type it out. That’s simple and efficient.

With Google Tasks, you get none of that.

I also love that I can give a priority level to each task, use filters and labels for improved organization, create sub-projects, and see what’s on my to-do list just today for improved focus, among many other features.

With Google Tasks, you get none of that. The only features I can highlight are the ability to create lists and add a star to a task so you can find it faster. All very basic stuff, really. With the amount of money, knowledge, and manpower Google has, it should be able to make a proper to-do list app instead of giving us this barebones offering, which I don’t think many people use.

YouTube Music

The YouTube Music explore tab on an Android device that is leaning on a stack of black books.

Nathan Drescher / Android Authority

This is by far the most developed app on this list. It’s a good one overall, I’ll give it that, but it still needs work since it’s facing tough competition from Spotify and the likes.

I want to minimize the number of apps I use, so I’d ideally like YouTube Music to be my main app for podcasts, but that’s not going to happen anytime soon. The podcast feature on YouTube Music feels like an afterthought instead of being well-integrated into the overall experience. It’s very hard to find podcasts to listen to, as its discovery feature is not great compared to rival apps. If you know what you want to listen to, you can search for it, and that’s that. But if you want to explore new podcasts in specific genres or see what other people are into, then YouTube Music is not that great.

Then there are the limitations of the free plan. The music stops playing as soon as I turn off the screen, which isn’t a big deal when I’m at home, as I tend to watch videos and check out lyrics while listening to my favorite jams. But when I’m in my car, turning off the display is a must as I want to preserve battery life. I can’t do that with YouTube Music, but I think I should be able to, especially since Google gets plenty of cash from the two ads I have to listen to every fourth or fifth song.

Spotify’s free plan, for instance, allows for background playback when the screen is off, and what’s even more interesting is that the number of ads I have to listen to is significantly lower compared to YouTube Music. Sure, Spotify has other limitations YouTube Music doesn’t, but I can live with those while listening to music in my car.

Google Wallpapers

Google Pixel 9 wallpapers on Pixel 8 Pro angled

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Pixel 8 Pro

I recently broke my phone and had to switch to an old OnePlus for the time being. I turned it on and found a Google Wallpaper app installed that I forgot existed. A wallpaper app from the maker of the Pixel and all those fancy apps I use at all times sounds exciting, but that excitement went away a few minutes after opening it.

The app is super basic and has a very small selection of wallpapers, especially compared to a rival app like Zedge. The wallpapers are separated into only ten categories, which seems incredibly low considering how many categories similar apps offer.

The selection of wallpapers is limited.

Not only is the selection limited, the wallpapers themselves aren’t really that good. Most are very generic in my opinion, although I did manage to find a few good ones. What I find interesting is that Google hasn’t even bothered connecting the app with Gemini, which would allow users to create custom wallpapers based on prompts. Google has a competitive advantage here that it’s simply not utilizing. The app itself is just so basic that I don’t know why Google made it in the first place.

These are the four apps Google needs to work on, but let me know in the comments if there are any others you think are sub-par.

Some of these bring back memories of apps like Google Podcasts, which were so basic for reasons unknown to me that Google decided to kill them

Which of these apps is your least favorite?

65 votes

. I don’t think that’s going to happen with apps like Keep and YouTube Music, but I don’t think a lot of people would miss an app like Wallpapers. At least, I wouldn’t.
]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/google-makes-great-apps-but-these-arent-it-if-you-ask-me/feed/ 0 49804
Will Bitcoin Survive Without Trump? Hedge Funds Aren’t Convinced, Says Semler https://earlybirdsinvest.com/will-bitcoin-survive-without-trump-hedge-funds-arent-convinced-says-semler/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/will-bitcoin-survive-without-trump-hedge-funds-arent-convinced-says-semler/#respond Sun, 22 Jun 2025 02:10:10 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/will-bitcoin-survive-without-trump-hedge-funds-arent-convinced-says-semler/

Crypto Journalist

Amin Ayan

Crypto Journalist

Amin Ayan

About Author

Amin Ayan is a crypto journalist with over four years of experience in the industry. He has contributed to leading publications such as Cryptonews, Investing.com, 99Bitcoins, and 24/7 Wall St. He has…

Last updated: 


Why Trust Cryptonews

Cryptonews has covered the cryptocurrency industry topics since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts have extensive experience in market analysis and blockchain technologies. We strive to maintain high editorial standards, focusing on factual accuracy and balanced reporting across all areas – from cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects to industry events, products, and technological developments. Our ongoing presence in the industry reflects our commitment to delivering relevant information in the evolving world of digital assets. Read more about Cryptonews

Eric Semler, chairman of Semler Scientific Inc., believes many hedge funds remain unconvinced about Bitcoin’s long-term viability beyond the Trump administration.

Key Takeaways:

  • Eric Semler says many hedge funds doubt Bitcoin’s future beyond the Trump administration.
  • Despite skepticism, Semler’s firm is aggressively building a BTC treasury, targeting 105,000 coins.
  • Crypto exposure among hedge funds is rising, with nearly half now holding digital assets.

Speaking in an interview with Natalie Brunell on Coin Stories, Semler said traditional finance still views Bitcoin as a fleeting trend that may not survive political transition.

“I think that they think it is a fly-by-night concept and that it is probably going to, after the Trump administration, go back down a lot,” said Semler, who also founded TCS Capital Management.

Trump’s Crypto Push Faces Uncertainty Beyond His Term

His remarks come as debate grows over whether U.S. political support for crypto will endure past President Trump’s term.

While Trump recently endorsed a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, figures like JAN3 CEO Samson Mow have warned that such initiatives could quickly unravel under a different administration.

Despite broader skepticism, Semler has gone in the opposite direction. In May, Semler Scientific became only the second U.S. public company to adopt a Bitcoin treasury strategy.

The firm currently holds 4,449 BTC and plans to ramp that up to 105,000 BTC within two and a half years, targeting 10,000 BTC by year-end.

For Semler, institutional doubt is part of the opportunity. “When you’re making a bet on something that the majority doesn’t believe in, and you’re right, you make so much more money,” he said.

“I love the negativity; I’m a contrarian investor,” he added, noting that his most profitable investments came when others were dismissive. “Those are the types of investments that have the highest returns.”

While some hedge fund managers are still hesitant, the broader trend suggests rising crypto exposure.

A 2024 survey by the Alternative Investment Management Association and PwC showed that 47% of hedge fund managers now hold some level of crypto exposure, up from 29% in 2023 and 37% in 2022.

Looking further back, a 2021 Intertrust Global survey of hedge fund CFOs showed that nearly all expected to allocate 7.2% of their portfolios to crypto by 2026.

VanEck Warns BTC Treasury Strategy May Backfire

Just recently, VanEck’s head of digital asset research, Matthew Sigel, raised concerns about the Bitcoin treasury strategies used by certain public companies, suggesting that continued accumulation of BTC could soon harm shareholders more than help.

He specifically criticized the use of at-the-market (ATM) share issuance programs, warning that they can become dilutive when stock prices approach the company’s Bitcoin net asset value (NAV).

Sigel proposed several measures to prevent value erosion, including pausing ATM programs if a company’s stock trades below 0.95x NAV for over 10 days.

He drew comparisons to past failures in the crypto mining sector, where excessive dilution and executive pay led to major shareholder losses.

As an example, he cited Semler Scientific, a medical tech firm that entered the BTC space in 2024.

Despite acquiring 3,808 BTC, its stock has fallen over 45%, and its mNAV has dropped to 0.82x.


]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/will-bitcoin-survive-without-trump-hedge-funds-arent-convinced-says-semler/feed/ 0 43393
Why aren’t Trump and RFK Jr. helping Milwaukee with its lead poisoning crisis? https://earlybirdsinvest.com/why-arent-trump-and-rfk-jr-helping-milwaukee-with-its-lead-poisoning-crisis/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/why-arent-trump-and-rfk-jr-helping-milwaukee-with-its-lead-poisoning-crisis/#respond Mon, 19 May 2025 19:02:02 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/why-arent-trump-and-rfk-jr-helping-milwaukee-with-its-lead-poisoning-crisis/

For many months now, the city of Milwaukee has been grappling with a lead poisoning crisis that has forced at least four schools to temporarily close and dozens more to undergo rigorous inspections.

It began on January 13, when Milwaukee first notified parents at one grade three to five school that a child had tested positive for high levels of lead in their blood. Local health officials determined the lead exposure did not occur at the child’s home, which left their school as the obvious culprit.

City investigators found chipped lead paint and lead-laden dust throughout the school building; press and government reports indicate that the school district has struggled to keep up with paint maintenance requests, due to a lack of funding and manpower. Local officials soon realized they had a big problem on their hands, as the vast majority of the city’s school buildings (roughly 125 out of 150) were built before 1978, when lead paint was banned.

Lead, a dangerous neurotoxin that can lead to development problems in children after prolonged exposure, has now been detected in at least nine public schools, and at least four students have tested positive for high lead levels in their blood. So far, no children have been hospitalized for acute lead poisoning, which can be life-threatening, but the affected kids continue to be monitored. Several buildings have been temporarily closed so workers can do a deep clean. Milwaukee has been inspecting all of its public schools for lead, with the goal of completing the review by September.

Normally, cities navigating such a crisis could depend on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for federal support. When the lead poisoning was first detected in January, at the tail end of the Biden administration, city health officials were immediately in contact with the CDC environmental health team, which included several of the country’s top lead poisoning experts, Milwaukee health commissioner Mike Totoraitis told me. A group of federal experts were planning a trip to the city at the end of April.

But not anymore. In early April, the Trump administration denied Milwaukee’s request for support because there was no longer anybody on the government’s payroll who could provide the lead poisoning expertise the city needs.

On April 1, the lead exposure team within the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health was laid off as part of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s massive restructuring of the federal health department. The planned trip was canceled, and no federal officials have stepped foot in Milwaukee since to aid in the response.

“We were talking to [the federal experts] multiple times each week,” Totoraitis said, “before they were let go.”

Milwaukee has pushed ahead with its own inspection and free blood testing clinics. The city reported on May 13 that it had replaced 10,000 lead water service lines, in an attempt to remove another possible source of exposure for local children. But they still have 55,000 more left to go, and local officials have said they would need state or federal funding to finish the job. (It is estimated to cost the city about $630 million.)

Ordinarily, Totoraitis said, the CDC experts would serve as the city’s subject matter experts, guiding them through their epidemiological investigations. Federal officials are especially adept at the detective work that can determine whether a child was exposed at home or at the school. Milwaukee officials had recent experience with lead exposures in homes but not in schools; they were relying on federal expertise to interpret lead dust levels that were found during the school inspections. Without them, they’ve been left to navigate a novel and dangerous health threat on their own.

“They were there for that sole purpose of having some of the best subject matter expertise on lead poisoning, and it’s gone now,” Totoraitis said. “Now we don’t have any experts at the CDC to reach out to.”

In this uncertain new era for public health, Milwaukee’s experience may become all too common: a city left to fend for itself amid an emergency. What in the past might have been a national scandal could become all too routine.

This is what happens when the federal government won’t respond to a health crisis

When I spoke with Totoraitis, he was already contemplating the next public health problem he would have to deal with. “If we have a new emerging health issue, that I don’t have internal expertise on and neither does the state, we don’t have anyone to call now,” Totoraitis said. “That’s a scary endeavor.”

He can’t be sure what kind of help he will be able to get from the federal government as the restructuring at the US Department of Health and Human Services continues. The department just rehired hundreds of health workers focused on workplace safety, but other teams, including the lead team, have not been brought back.

The turmoil makes it harder for local officials to keep track of which federal experts are still on staff, where they are located, and who has actually been let go. But the message is clear: President Donald Trump and his senior deputies want state and local governments to take on more of these responsibilities — without a helping hand from the feds.

The US public health system has been set up so that the state and local health departments are the front line, monitoring emerging problems and providing personnel in a crisis. The federal government supplies insights that state and local officials probably don’t have on their own. That is what Totoraitis was depending on; Milwaukee was inexperienced with lead exposures in large public buildings before this year’s emergency. (One of the laid-off CDC scientists has since sought to volunteer to help Milwaukee, as Stat recently reported; the person told me they were hoping to help with community engagement, which federal officials would usually assist with.)

Health crises happen all the time. Right now, there is a small tuberculosis outbreak in Kansas; a Florida town experienced the unexpected spread of hepatitis last December. A dozen people have been hospitalized in a listeria outbreak. And the US is currently facing its largest outbreak of measles in decades, with more than 1,000 people sickened. At one point, local officials said that the federal government had cut off funding for the outbreak response as part of a massive clawback of federal funds at the end of March, although the CDC has since sent additional workers to West Texas where the outbreak originated.

There used to be little doubt the federal government would step up in these scenarios. But Totoraitis warns that Milwaukee’s experience of the past few months, left to fend for itself in an emergency, could soon be repeated elsewhere.

“Let’s say next year this time, St. Louis is in a similar situation — they could call us, but we don’t have the bandwidth to consistently support them,” Totoraitis said. “This unfortunately is a great example of how quickly changes in the federal government can affect local government.”

Kids are being poisoned by lead. Trump is letting it happen.

Kennedy, Trump, and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency gleefully cut 10,000 jobs from US health agencies this spring. The cost of those losses will be felt every time a city is confronted with an unexpected health threat. Today, in Milwaukee, families are facing the fear and uncertainty of lead exposure — and they know federal help isn’t coming. As one Milwaukee mom told ABC News recently: “It really sends the message of, ‘You don’t matter.’”

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/why-arent-trump-and-rfk-jr-helping-milwaukee-with-its-lead-poisoning-crisis/feed/ 0 37152
Nothing’s Essential Space AI feature has an essential catch and user’s aren’t happy https://earlybirdsinvest.com/nothings-essential-space-ai-feature-has-an-essential-catch-and-users-arent-happy/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/nothings-essential-space-ai-feature-has-an-essential-catch-and-users-arent-happy/#respond Mon, 07 Apr 2025 03:39:57 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/nothings-essential-space-ai-feature-has-an-essential-catch-and-users-arent-happy/
Nothing Essential Space details

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

TL;DR

  • Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro users are hitting unexpected monthly limits in Essential Space.
  • Nothing didn’t disclose these caps at launch, sparking user backlash.
  • Fans are worried that the feature may become paid in the future, which, as we previously found, is a real possibility.

Nothing recently unveiled its mid-range smartphones, the Phone 3a and Phone 3a Pro, with a strong focus on AI-powered productivity. A major highlight of these devices is the introduction of a new hardware button called the Essential Key, designed to work with the company’s new Essential Space app. This app lets users record audio or take screenshots to generate reminders and perform other productivity-related tasks through AI.

The inclusion of a dedicated hardware key signals that Nothing sees Essential Space as a core part of the user experience on its new devices. However, what the company didn’t communicate at launch is that Essential Space has a monthly processing limit; a restriction that’s now frustrating early adopters.

Android Authority had previously uncovered this limitation in an APK teardown, but with no official word from Nothing at launch, users have taken to Reddit to express their disappointment.

Nothing users cry foul

Essential Space limit banner

“Never expected this. That’s the USP of the product. When they have a cap on the USP, then there’s no point in advertising as a unique feature,” wrote one frustrated user.

Another user commented, “This is pretty sad, especially if Nothing did not confirm it before launching the phone, that there is a limit to Essential Space. What if for someone this is a main reason they buy the phone and then later Nothing just restricts it, or even puts it behind a paywall?”

Some users who depend on the feature for daily tasks are particularly upset.

“It is pretty much one of the reasons I went for the 3a. I am kinda forgetful and this has been very useful to keep track of my work tasks, expenses, reminders for client requests, etc. Now I can’t do any of it,” said a user.

Some folks are also concerned that Nothing may be moving away from its enthusiast-friendly approach.

“The company has changed its ways since their success in the phone market. Not the old enthusiastic customer-oriented company anymore.” a Redditor noted.

Android Authority’s APK teardown also previously found evidence suggesting that Nothing could be planning to monetize Essential Space in the future. Although the company told us that it hasn’t made any decisions around potential pricing, a paywall on Essential Space could draw further criticism from users expecting free, unrestricted access to the feature.

For now, the decision to cap Essential Space usage without transparent communication is not sitting well with Nothing’s community, especially for a feature tied directly to a physical button on the company’s phones.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/nothings-essential-space-ai-feature-has-an-essential-catch-and-users-arent-happy/feed/ 0 29430
Bitcoin’s Price Aren’t Just Crypto Signals—They’re NFT Forecasts https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoins-price-arent-just-crypto-signals-theyre-nft-forecasts/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoins-price-arent-just-crypto-signals-theyre-nft-forecasts/#respond Wed, 02 Apr 2025 15:53:09 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoins-price-arent-just-crypto-signals-theyre-nft-forecasts/

Bitcoin isn’t just another crypto—it’s the market’s pulse. And right now, it’s telling us exactly what’s coming next for NFTs. When Bitcoin sneezes, the NFT market catches a cold—and the correlation isn’t just noticeable, it’s borderline predictive.

Keeping an eye on the Bitcoin price gives NFT collectors and traders a head start on what’s coming. Whether it’s creeping upward in the background or spiking during a bullish breakout, Bitcoin’s movements tend to ripple across every corner of the web3 space—shaping sentiment, volume, and volatility across collections.

Exchanges typically provide real-time data, 24-hour change indicators, and historical charts that many use to get a better sense of macro trends before they impact floor prices.

Bitcoin’s Price Aren’t Just Crypto Signals—They’re NFT Forecasts
Source: CoinGecko

Bitcoin Price Over the Years

In early 2021, Bitcoin surged past $40,000 for the first time, bringing millions of new eyes to crypto—right as NFTs began to make headlines. Within weeks, Beeple’s Everydays sold for $69 million at Christie’s, setting the tone for a mainstream NFT explosion. By late 2021, Bitcoin climbed to nearly $64,000, and collections like Bored Ape Yacht Club, Art Blocks, and Cool Cats hit record valuations.

Of course, the opposite proved equally dramatic. In mid-2022, Bitcoin slipped below $20,000. The result? NFT volumes collapsed. According to NonFungible.com, NFT sales volume in June dropped more than 75% compared to January that year.

This kind of contraction doesn’t happen in isolation—it mirrors the flow of capital, confidence, and liquidity throughout the entire crypto sector.

Bitcoin’s Price Aren’t Just Crypto Signals—They’re NFT Forecasts
Source: Unsplash

Why do Bitcoin price movements matter to NFT traders?

Understanding market sentiment is about more than just vibes with tools like the Fear and Greed Index helping decode what investors are feeling in response to volatility. And for NFT traders, those emotional shifts often appear first in Bitcoin’s price chart.

Meanwhile, builders and investors focused on web3 gaming or metaverse developments have also started to align their strategies with macro crypto cycles.

Floor prices, mint success, and project visibility all depend, in part, on how well the broader crypto environment is performing.

Conclusion

The smart money’s not just watching NFT listings—they’re watching the charts. If you want to stay ahead in this market, start with the signals that move everything else. And more often than not, that signal is Bitcoin.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/bitcoins-price-arent-just-crypto-signals-theyre-nft-forecasts/feed/ 0 28613
Ask Jerry: Why aren’t smartphones getting better? https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ask-jerry-why-arent-smartphones-getting-better/ https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ask-jerry-why-arent-smartphones-getting-better/#respond Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:15:43 +0000 https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ask-jerry-why-arent-smartphones-getting-better/

Welcome to Ask Jerry, where we talk about any and all the questions you might have about the smart things in your life. I’m Jerry, and I have spent the better part of my life working with tech. I have a background in engineering and R&D and have been covering Android and Google for the past 15 years.

Ask Jerry

Android Avatar of Jerry

(Image credit: Future)

Ask Jerry is a column where we answer your burning Android/tech questions with the help of long-time Android Central editor Jerry Hildenbrand.

I’m also really good at researching data about everything — that’s a big part of our job here at Android Central — and I love to help people (another big part of our job!). If you have questions about your tech, I’d love to talk about them.

Email me at askjerryac@gmail.com, and I’ll try to get things sorted out. You can remain anonymous if you like, and we promise we’re not sharing anything we don’t cover here.

I look forward to hearing from you!


When is the next big breakthrough coming? This is boring.

Showing the different multitasking UIs on six different Android phones

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Milo asks:

Why are smartphones not getting better? It seems like we have so many places to get better, but all phones are essentially the same now.

Hi Milo, and thanks for asking! This is a polarizing issue, but I can see where you’re going — almost every phone is a rectangular sandwich of glass running software that does the same things as other phones. It seems like they all came from a clone factory.

On the other hand, a lot of people are going to disagree. This is because some phones are outliers, like foldables or phones with an S Pen, and the small software features can make a big difference for the people who use them regularly.

Still, if you put 100 new phones in a box, most of them are just like the others, so I get it.

There are reasons for this, of course. A phone maker has two goals when it offers a new product — it wants it to be popular and sell in the millions, and it wants to make a bit of profit from every unit sold. To do this, they have to offer what they’re sure people want to buy.

If you look at a Galaxy S25, a Pixel 9, an iPhone 16, a OnePlus 13, or any other “normal” smartphone, you can see they seem alike, especially at a glance. However, the small differences add up and are what makes people choose one over the other.

If you want to take amazing photos without fiddling with anything, buy a Pixel 9. If you want to do the same for video, buy an iPhone 16. Want the ultimate set of specs and hardware for a good price? The OnePlus 13 is for you. And, of course, the Galaxy S25 further refines the software people love with One UI. There are differences even though they seem the same at a glance.

BlackBerry KEY2

(Image credit: Future)

But there are other phones out there, especially on the Android side. It’s hard to say the industry is stagnant when you can buy a phone that folds out three ways, a phone that flips open like a Star Trek Communicator, or a phone that silos an integrated smart stylus. A Techno Phantom Ultimate 2 (these names are getting terrible) or a Motorola Razr Plus 2024 (see?) aren’t anything like a Pixel or an iPhone. Even the Galaxy S25 Ultra and its S Pen are very different from the base model S25 or any slab phone.

I think phone makers are innovating but in a different way than they used to. We see fewer gimmicks like an IR blaster or a tiny ticker screen and more focus on the things that seem to sell. You and I might have loved the IR blaster or the LG V10’s small ticker tape screen, but they didn’t add to the overall sales numbers in a way that justifies their inclusion. And that’s the real deciding factor.

LG V10 Second Screen settings

(Image credit: Jerry Hildenbrand / Android Central)

Phone makers are also working on ways to make their phones thinner and batteries that last longer. These aren’t flashy innovations that stand out from the pack, but they’re something that people demand. Remember, making a thin device even thinner or packing a bigger battery in a tighter space isn’t easy.

We all won’t appreciate the design and hardware innovation in the smartphone world of the past few years. I want a thicker phone with a big removable battery, made of quality plastic with enough bezel to hold it without my big, thick thumbs hitting the screen. Better yet, BlackBerry could rise from the ashes and build me what I loved to use.

None of this is happening because what I want isn’t as important as what most people want. I think phone makers are delivering what people want, and these small differences make a world of difference when it comes to using your phone.

Eventually, some company will fire off something nerdy, goofy, and weird that enthusiasts love. If it sells, then the other companies will copy it. Until then, we’ll see the small differences and minor revisions between models to make them consumer-friendly.

]]>
https://earlybirdsinvest.com/ask-jerry-why-arent-smartphones-getting-better/feed/ 0 21621